Use of transoral ultrasonography technique in tongue cancer: Advantages and disadvantages

G. Allakhverdieva, A. Mudunov, A. Batsev
{"title":"Use of transoral ultrasonography technique in tongue cancer: Advantages and disadvantages","authors":"G. Allakhverdieva, A. Mudunov, A. Batsev","doi":"10.17650/2782-3202-2022-2-4-41-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To evaluate advantages and disadvantages of transoral ultrasonography (US) in tongue cancer.Materials and methods. US was performed in 165 patients between the ages of 15 and 85 years with malignant tumors of the mobile tongue (74 (44.9 %) women, 91 (55.1 %) men).Among 165 patients, 144 had primary tongue tumor. The study also included 21 (12.7 %) patients with recurrent tumor which clinically could be represented by a true recurrence (tumor development 6 months after the end of treatment) or by continued growth (tumor development less than 6 months after the end of treatment). The study included patients with tongue tumors Т1 - 50 (30.3 %) patients, Т2 - 78 (47.3 %) patients, Т3 - 16.4 % of patients, Т4 - 6.1 % of patients.Three types of approach to tongue tumor visualization were used: submandibular, transoral, and transbuccal with a standard linear transducer (4-9 MHz) and intraoperative linear transducer (5-14 MHz). In total in 165 patients with tongue tumors, 147 (89.1 %) transoral US, 86 (52.1 %) submandibular US and 25 (15.2 %) transbuccal US examinations were performed.Results. Among 165 patients, agreement between the sizes measured using US and histological examination was observed in 142 (86.1 %) patients taking into account 15 % error.With increasing tumor thickness and, correspondingly, T criterion, increased frequency of agreement between US data and histological data was observed. Thus, for T1 stage frequency of agreement with US data was observed in 61.8 % of cases, for Т2 stage in 81.1 % of cases, for Т3 stage in 93.8 %, and for Т4 stage agreement was observed in 100 % of cases.Frequency of agreement with histological data in evaluation of tongue tumor thickness for transoral approach was significantly higher than for submandibular approach (р = 0.014). Transoral technique was more accurate for measurement of thickness of primary tumors - 80.3 % of results agreed with histological examination, and for recurrences frequency of agreement was only 33.3 %. Submandibular approach for primary tumors showed accurate measurements only in 67.6 % of cases, in recurrent tumors in 58.3 % of cases. Transbuccal approach also showed higher measurement accuracy for tumor thickness in primary patients (70.0 %) compared to recurrent tumors (40.0 %).Conclusion. Use of transoral ultrasonography significantly improves clinical staging of tongue tumors at the preoperative stage.","PeriodicalId":318498,"journal":{"name":"MD-Onco","volume":"186 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MD-Onco","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3202-2022-2-4-41-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate advantages and disadvantages of transoral ultrasonography (US) in tongue cancer.Materials and methods. US was performed in 165 patients between the ages of 15 and 85 years with malignant tumors of the mobile tongue (74 (44.9 %) women, 91 (55.1 %) men).Among 165 patients, 144 had primary tongue tumor. The study also included 21 (12.7 %) patients with recurrent tumor which clinically could be represented by a true recurrence (tumor development 6 months after the end of treatment) or by continued growth (tumor development less than 6 months after the end of treatment). The study included patients with tongue tumors Т1 - 50 (30.3 %) patients, Т2 - 78 (47.3 %) patients, Т3 - 16.4 % of patients, Т4 - 6.1 % of patients.Three types of approach to tongue tumor visualization were used: submandibular, transoral, and transbuccal with a standard linear transducer (4-9 MHz) and intraoperative linear transducer (5-14 MHz). In total in 165 patients with tongue tumors, 147 (89.1 %) transoral US, 86 (52.1 %) submandibular US and 25 (15.2 %) transbuccal US examinations were performed.Results. Among 165 patients, agreement between the sizes measured using US and histological examination was observed in 142 (86.1 %) patients taking into account 15 % error.With increasing tumor thickness and, correspondingly, T criterion, increased frequency of agreement between US data and histological data was observed. Thus, for T1 stage frequency of agreement with US data was observed in 61.8 % of cases, for Т2 stage in 81.1 % of cases, for Т3 stage in 93.8 %, and for Т4 stage agreement was observed in 100 % of cases.Frequency of agreement with histological data in evaluation of tongue tumor thickness for transoral approach was significantly higher than for submandibular approach (р = 0.014). Transoral technique was more accurate for measurement of thickness of primary tumors - 80.3 % of results agreed with histological examination, and for recurrences frequency of agreement was only 33.3 %. Submandibular approach for primary tumors showed accurate measurements only in 67.6 % of cases, in recurrent tumors in 58.3 % of cases. Transbuccal approach also showed higher measurement accuracy for tumor thickness in primary patients (70.0 %) compared to recurrent tumors (40.0 %).Conclusion. Use of transoral ultrasonography significantly improves clinical staging of tongue tumors at the preoperative stage.
经口超声技术在舌癌诊断中的应用:利弊
的目标。目的探讨经口超声检查在舌癌诊断中的利弊。材料和方法。我们对165例15 ~ 85岁的舌部恶性肿瘤患者进行了US检查,其中74例(44.9%)为女性,91例(55.1%)为男性。165例患者中有144例原发舌瘤。该研究还包括21例(12.7%)复发性肿瘤患者,这些患者在临床上可以表现为真正的复发(治疗结束后6个月肿瘤发展)或持续生长(治疗结束后不到6个月肿瘤发展)。研究对象为舌肿瘤患者Т1 ~ 50例(30.3%)、Т2 ~ 78例(47.3%)、Т3 ~ 16.4%、Т4 ~ 6.1%。使用标准线性换能器(4-9 MHz)和术中线性换能器(5-14 MHz)三种方式进行舌肿瘤显像:下颌下、经口和经颊。在165例舌肿瘤患者中,经口超声检查147例(89.1%),下颌骨超声检查86例(52.1%),经颊超声检查25例(15.2%)。在165例患者中,考虑到15%的误差,142例(86.1%)患者使用US测量的尺寸与组织学检查一致。随着肿瘤厚度的增加,相应的,T标准的增加,我们观察到US数据与组织学数据之间的一致性增加。因此,T1阶段与美国数据一致的频率在61.8%的病例中观察到,Т2阶段为81.1%的病例,Т3阶段为93.8%,Т4阶段为100%的病例。经口入路评价舌瘤厚度与组织学资料吻合的频率显著高于下颌下入路(χ = 0.014)。经口技术对原发肿瘤的厚度测量更为准确,80.3%的结果与组织学检查一致,而复发率仅为33.3%。下颌下入路对原发肿瘤的测量准确度仅为67.6%,对复发肿瘤的测量准确度为58.3%。经颊入路对原发患者的肿瘤厚度测量准确率(70.0%)高于复发患者(40.0%)。术前应用经口超声检查可明显改善舌肿瘤的临床分期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信