{"title":"Proof-guided testing: an experimental study","authors":"G. Lussier, H. Waeselynck, K. Guennoun","doi":"10.1109/CMPSAC.2004.1342890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proof-guided testing is intended to enhance the test design with information extracted from the argument for correctness. The target application field is the verification of fault-tolerance algorithms where a paper proof is published Ideally, testing should be focused on the weak parts of the demonstration. The identification of weak parts proceeds by restructuring the informal discourse as a proof tree and analyzing it step by step. The approach is experimentally assessed using the example of a flawed group membership protocol (GMP). Results are quite promising: (1) compared to crude random testing, the proof-guided method allowed us to significantly improve the fault revealing power of test data; (2) the overall method also provided useful feedback on the proof and its potential flaw(s).","PeriodicalId":355273,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2004. COMPSAC 2004.","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2004. COMPSAC 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.2004.1342890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Proof-guided testing is intended to enhance the test design with information extracted from the argument for correctness. The target application field is the verification of fault-tolerance algorithms where a paper proof is published Ideally, testing should be focused on the weak parts of the demonstration. The identification of weak parts proceeds by restructuring the informal discourse as a proof tree and analyzing it step by step. The approach is experimentally assessed using the example of a flawed group membership protocol (GMP). Results are quite promising: (1) compared to crude random testing, the proof-guided method allowed us to significantly improve the fault revealing power of test data; (2) the overall method also provided useful feedback on the proof and its potential flaw(s).