{"title":"The impact of microphysical uncertainty conditional on initial and boundary condition uncertainty under varying synoptic control","authors":"T. Matsunobu, C. Keil, C. Barthlott","doi":"10.5194/wcd-3-1273-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The relative impact of individual and combined uncertainties of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and the shape parameter of the cloud\ndroplet size distribution (CDSD) in the presence of initial and boundary condition uncertainty (IBC) on convection forecasts is quantified using the\nconvection-permitting model ICON-D2 (ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic). We performed 180-member ensemble simulations for five real case studies representing different synoptic forcing\nsituations over Germany and inspected the precipitation variability on different spatial and temporal scales. During weak synoptic control, the\nrelative impact of combined microphysical uncertainty on daily area-averaged precipitation accounts for about one-third of the variability caused by\noperational IBC uncertainty. The effect of combined microphysical perturbations exceeds the impact of individual CCN or CDSD perturbations and is\ntwice as large during weak control. The combination of IBC and microphysical uncertainty affects the extremes of daily spatially averaged rainfall\nof individual members by extending the tails of the forecast distribution by 5 % in weakly forced conditions. The responses are relatively\ninsensitive in strong forcing situations. Visual inspection and objective analysis of the spatial variability in hourly rainfall rates reveal that\nIBC and microphysical uncertainties alter the spatial variability in precipitation forecasts differently. Microphysical perturbations slightly shift\nconvective cells but affect precipitation intensities, while IBC perturbations scramble the location of convection during weak control. Cloud and\nrainwater contents are more sensitive to microphysical uncertainty than precipitation and less dependent on synoptic control.\n","PeriodicalId":383272,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1273-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract. The relative impact of individual and combined uncertainties of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and the shape parameter of the cloud
droplet size distribution (CDSD) in the presence of initial and boundary condition uncertainty (IBC) on convection forecasts is quantified using the
convection-permitting model ICON-D2 (ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic). We performed 180-member ensemble simulations for five real case studies representing different synoptic forcing
situations over Germany and inspected the precipitation variability on different spatial and temporal scales. During weak synoptic control, the
relative impact of combined microphysical uncertainty on daily area-averaged precipitation accounts for about one-third of the variability caused by
operational IBC uncertainty. The effect of combined microphysical perturbations exceeds the impact of individual CCN or CDSD perturbations and is
twice as large during weak control. The combination of IBC and microphysical uncertainty affects the extremes of daily spatially averaged rainfall
of individual members by extending the tails of the forecast distribution by 5 % in weakly forced conditions. The responses are relatively
insensitive in strong forcing situations. Visual inspection and objective analysis of the spatial variability in hourly rainfall rates reveal that
IBC and microphysical uncertainties alter the spatial variability in precipitation forecasts differently. Microphysical perturbations slightly shift
convective cells but affect precipitation intensities, while IBC perturbations scramble the location of convection during weak control. Cloud and
rainwater contents are more sensitive to microphysical uncertainty than precipitation and less dependent on synoptic control.