Preference for grasscutter offal by some consumers in the Greater Accra and Ashanti regions of Ghana

A. Wajah, B. Emikpe, D. Asare, T. N. Asenso, D. Essel-Cobbinah
{"title":"Preference for grasscutter offal by some consumers in the Greater Accra and Ashanti regions of Ghana","authors":"A. Wajah, B. Emikpe, D. Asare, T. N. Asenso, D. Essel-Cobbinah","doi":"10.4314/sokjvs.v20i3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to assess the preference for grasscutter offal among consumers in the Greater Accra and Ashanti regions of Ghana. The stratified three-stage random sampling was adopted for the selection of respondents. A total of 140 respondents (120 consumers; 20 operators) were used in this study. In the Ashanti region, 93 consumers and 13 chop bar operators were considered. Within the Greater Accra region, only one market was selected (Agbogbloshie market), where 27 consumers and seven chop bar operators were considered. Relevant information was collected through the administration of well-structured questionnaires. Results obtained showed a relatively higher offal preference by consumers in the Ashanti region (91.4%) as compared to the Greater Accra region (81.5%). Most consumers preferred the intestines and intestinal contents in both represented areas 60% from the Ashanti region and 45.6% from the Greater Accra region. 90.6% and 81.8% of the consumers from the Ashanti and Greater Accra regions, respectively preferred cooked offal to either smoked or roasted. These regional differences were not statistically significant. The rate of offal consumption was higher in the Ashanti region (i.e., on a weekly basis) as compared to the Greater Accra region (i.e., occasionally), represented by 63.5% and 68.2%, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The taste was considered the most significant, relevant and important factor affecting consumer preference for grasscutter offal consumption in both regions. It is concluded in this study that the grasscutter offal has relatively high patronage by the respondents in this study. Further studies should be focused on the possible health implication of offal consumption on consumers as the intestines, and their contents might contain some parasites and other bacteria which can be harmful to humans. Further studies should be carried out to obtain a nationwide view of grasscutter offal consumption.","PeriodicalId":253894,"journal":{"name":"Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sokjvs.v20i3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the preference for grasscutter offal among consumers in the Greater Accra and Ashanti regions of Ghana. The stratified three-stage random sampling was adopted for the selection of respondents. A total of 140 respondents (120 consumers; 20 operators) were used in this study. In the Ashanti region, 93 consumers and 13 chop bar operators were considered. Within the Greater Accra region, only one market was selected (Agbogbloshie market), where 27 consumers and seven chop bar operators were considered. Relevant information was collected through the administration of well-structured questionnaires. Results obtained showed a relatively higher offal preference by consumers in the Ashanti region (91.4%) as compared to the Greater Accra region (81.5%). Most consumers preferred the intestines and intestinal contents in both represented areas 60% from the Ashanti region and 45.6% from the Greater Accra region. 90.6% and 81.8% of the consumers from the Ashanti and Greater Accra regions, respectively preferred cooked offal to either smoked or roasted. These regional differences were not statistically significant. The rate of offal consumption was higher in the Ashanti region (i.e., on a weekly basis) as compared to the Greater Accra region (i.e., occasionally), represented by 63.5% and 68.2%, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The taste was considered the most significant, relevant and important factor affecting consumer preference for grasscutter offal consumption in both regions. It is concluded in this study that the grasscutter offal has relatively high patronage by the respondents in this study. Further studies should be focused on the possible health implication of offal consumption on consumers as the intestines, and their contents might contain some parasites and other bacteria which can be harmful to humans. Further studies should be carried out to obtain a nationwide view of grasscutter offal consumption.
在加纳的大阿克拉和阿散蒂地区,一些消费者偏爱割草者的内脏
本研究的目的是评估加纳大阿克拉和阿散蒂地区消费者对割草人内脏的偏好。调查对象的选择采用分层三阶段随机抽样。共有140名受访者(120名消费者;本研究使用了20名操作者。在阿散蒂地区,考虑了93个消费者和13个切棒经营者。在大阿克拉地区,只选择了一个市场(Agbogbloshie市场),其中考虑了27名消费者和7名切酒吧经营者。通过组织合理的问卷调查收集相关信息。获得的结果显示,与大阿克拉地区(81.5%)相比,阿散蒂地区消费者对动物内脏的偏好相对较高(91.4%)。大多数消费者更喜欢肠道和肠道内容物,这两个地区60%来自阿散蒂地区,45.6%来自大阿克拉地区。来自阿散蒂和大阿克拉地区的90.6%和81.8%的消费者分别更喜欢煮熟的内脏,而不是烟熏或烤。这些地区差异没有统计学意义。与大阿克拉地区(即偶尔)相比,阿散蒂地区(即每周)的内脏消费率更高,分别为63.5%和68.2%。差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在这两个地区,口味被认为是影响消费者对割草内脏消费偏好的最显著、最相关和最重要的因素。本研究得出的结论是,在本研究中,被调查者对割草人内脏有较高的惠顾度。进一步的研究应该集中在食用内脏对消费者的健康影响上,因为内脏内容物可能含有一些对人体有害的寄生虫和其他细菌。应该进行进一步的研究,以获得全国范围内的割草动物内脏消费情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信