PLURALISMO NA CIÊNCIA ECONÔMICA OU UM ESTADO TRANSITÓRIO EM DIREÇÃO A UM NOVO MAINSTREAM PÓS-NEOCLÁSSICO?

M. Anache, L. C. Laurencel, Carlos Benevenuto Guisard Koehler
{"title":"PLURALISMO NA CIÊNCIA ECONÔMICA OU UM ESTADO TRANSITÓRIO EM DIREÇÃO A UM NOVO MAINSTREAM PÓS-NEOCLÁSSICO?","authors":"M. Anache, L. C. Laurencel, Carlos Benevenuto Guisard Koehler","doi":"10.22533/at.ed.50820111224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article initially intends to expose a methodological reflection on the unsuccessful attempt of economic science to find a unique method to constitute its theories. We then address an attempt by the same science to find better explanations for the phenomena it faces. Therefore, the state of the art of mainstream pluralism was seen as an enterprise seeking to give dynamism to the economist's profession and somehow counteract the label of a monism in the area. Finally, it concludes with some observations about a certain eclecticism within the most current approaches, where the great doubt, expressed in the title of this work, remains sub judice.","PeriodicalId":360490,"journal":{"name":"Sentidos e Sujeitos: Elementos que dão Consistência à História 2","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sentidos e Sujeitos: Elementos que dão Consistência à História 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.50820111224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article initially intends to expose a methodological reflection on the unsuccessful attempt of economic science to find a unique method to constitute its theories. We then address an attempt by the same science to find better explanations for the phenomena it faces. Therefore, the state of the art of mainstream pluralism was seen as an enterprise seeking to give dynamism to the economist's profession and somehow counteract the label of a monism in the area. Finally, it concludes with some observations about a certain eclecticism within the most current approaches, where the great doubt, expressed in the title of this work, remains sub judice.
经济科学的多元主义还是迈向新后新古典主义主流的过渡状态?
本文首先是对经济科学试图寻找一种独特的理论构成方法的失败尝试进行方法论反思。然后,我们讨论了同一门科学为其所面临的现象寻找更好解释的尝试。因此,主流多元主义的艺术状态被视为一种寻求为经济学家的职业注入活力的事业,并以某种方式抵消该领域一元论的标签。最后,它总结了一些关于当前方法中某种折衷主义的观察,其中巨大的怀疑,在这项工作的标题中表达,仍然是次判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信