Metropolises in the Global Governance: Towards a 21st Century Neo-Medievalism?

M. Antonescu
{"title":"Metropolises in the Global Governance: Towards a 21st Century Neo-Medievalism?","authors":"M. Antonescu","doi":"10.18662/lumenss/03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The XXIst century order represents, in our opinion, a dynamic order, having a complex nature, defined by state actors and especially, by decisions and actions of the non-state actors. The present paper premise is to explore, apart from these features, the multi-level governance of this XXIst century order as post-westphalian order, where multiple sovereignties are shaped, due to the existence of multiple levels of governance. The academics are using, as to define this process, the ”neo-medievalist” term, to illustrate the diffuse, interconnected authorities and multiple levels of political decision, and also, the rising of non-state actors on the global framework. We consider that, among these global actors, there can be taken into account also, the metropolises and megalopolises, which, at present, from the perspective of the contemporary international law, haven’t acquired the quality of being subjects of international law, as the states. Nevertheless, in a global order, based on a global normative regime regarding the non-state actors (in this case, the megalopolises and metropolises), and also, from the perspective of a global law, these actors are receiving the quality of subjects of global law, allowing them to assume responsibility before regional and international jurisdictional instances.","PeriodicalId":203824,"journal":{"name":"Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Social Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The XXIst century order represents, in our opinion, a dynamic order, having a complex nature, defined by state actors and especially, by decisions and actions of the non-state actors. The present paper premise is to explore, apart from these features, the multi-level governance of this XXIst century order as post-westphalian order, where multiple sovereignties are shaped, due to the existence of multiple levels of governance. The academics are using, as to define this process, the ”neo-medievalist” term, to illustrate the diffuse, interconnected authorities and multiple levels of political decision, and also, the rising of non-state actors on the global framework. We consider that, among these global actors, there can be taken into account also, the metropolises and megalopolises, which, at present, from the perspective of the contemporary international law, haven’t acquired the quality of being subjects of international law, as the states. Nevertheless, in a global order, based on a global normative regime regarding the non-state actors (in this case, the megalopolises and metropolises), and also, from the perspective of a global law, these actors are receiving the quality of subjects of global law, allowing them to assume responsibility before regional and international jurisdictional instances.
全球治理中的大都市:走向21世纪的新中世纪主义?
在我们看来,21世纪的秩序是一种动态的秩序,具有复杂的性质,由国家行为体,特别是非国家行为体的决策和行动来定义。除了这些特征之外,本文的前提是探索21世纪秩序的多层次治理,即后威斯特伐利亚秩序,其中由于多级治理的存在而形成了多个主权。学者们用“新中世纪主义”一词来定义这一过程,以说明分散的、相互关联的当局和多层次的政治决策,以及非国家行为体在全球框架中的崛起。我们认为,在这些全球行为体中,还可以考虑到大都市和特大城市,从当代国际法的角度来看,它们目前还没有获得作为国际法主体的国家的性质。然而,在全球秩序中,基于关于非国家行为体(在这种情况下,是特大城市和大都市)的全球规范制度,并且从全球法律的角度来看,这些行为体正在获得全球法律主体的质量,使他们能够在区域和国际管辖情况下承担责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信