Professional education among haemophilia nurses: a survey of current practices

Simon Fletcher, S. Chaplin, C. Harrison, K. Juusola, N. Collins
{"title":"Professional education among haemophilia nurses: a survey of current practices","authors":"Simon Fletcher, S. Chaplin, C. Harrison, K. Juusola, N. Collins","doi":"10.17225/JHP00150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Guidance from the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) sets out the educational milestones haemophilia nurses should aim to achieve. However, little is known about the resources nurses use for education and current awareness. Aims: To assess the current educational level of haemophilia nurses, how and where they access ongoing education, where they feel they need extra support, and how best this teaching could be delivered. Methods: Haemophilia nurses in the Haemnet Horizons group devised and piloted a questionnaire. This was distributed in hard copy to nurses attending the 2019 EAHAD Congress and promoted as an online survey hosted by Survey Monkey. Results: Seventy-five replies were received from nurses in Europe (46 in the UK), and two from nurses in Chile and the Philippines. Most described their role as ‘specialist nurse’, with the majority having worked in haemophilia care for up to ten years. Half had a nursing degree and one quarter had a nursing diploma. Three quarters had attended at least one course specifically related to haemophilia nursing. Almost all used academic sources, study days and the websites of health profession organisations as information sources. Most also used Google or Wikipedia, but fewer used Twitter. Patient association websites were more popular among non-UK nurses. About half attended sponsored professional meetings and three quarters reported that educational meetings were available in their workplace. A clear majority preferred interactive and face-to-face activities using patient-focused content. Conclusions: The study shows that nurses, predominantly in Western Europe, access a range of educational resources, most of which are ‘traditional’. Use of online sources is high, but social media are less popular than Google or Wikipedia. Further research is needed to explore the potential of new media for haemophilia nurse education, and whether the current educational levels and needs highlighted in the survey remains the same across the whole of Europe.","PeriodicalId":372940,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17225/JHP00150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Guidance from the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) sets out the educational milestones haemophilia nurses should aim to achieve. However, little is known about the resources nurses use for education and current awareness. Aims: To assess the current educational level of haemophilia nurses, how and where they access ongoing education, where they feel they need extra support, and how best this teaching could be delivered. Methods: Haemophilia nurses in the Haemnet Horizons group devised and piloted a questionnaire. This was distributed in hard copy to nurses attending the 2019 EAHAD Congress and promoted as an online survey hosted by Survey Monkey. Results: Seventy-five replies were received from nurses in Europe (46 in the UK), and two from nurses in Chile and the Philippines. Most described their role as ‘specialist nurse’, with the majority having worked in haemophilia care for up to ten years. Half had a nursing degree and one quarter had a nursing diploma. Three quarters had attended at least one course specifically related to haemophilia nursing. Almost all used academic sources, study days and the websites of health profession organisations as information sources. Most also used Google or Wikipedia, but fewer used Twitter. Patient association websites were more popular among non-UK nurses. About half attended sponsored professional meetings and three quarters reported that educational meetings were available in their workplace. A clear majority preferred interactive and face-to-face activities using patient-focused content. Conclusions: The study shows that nurses, predominantly in Western Europe, access a range of educational resources, most of which are ‘traditional’. Use of online sources is high, but social media are less popular than Google or Wikipedia. Further research is needed to explore the potential of new media for haemophilia nurse education, and whether the current educational levels and needs highlighted in the survey remains the same across the whole of Europe.
血友病护士的专业教育:现状调查
背景:来自欧洲血友病及相关疾病协会(EAHAD)的指南列出了血友病护士应致力于实现的教育里程碑。然而,人们对护士用于教育的资源和目前的认识知之甚少。目的:评估血友病护士目前的教育水平,他们如何以及在哪里获得持续教育,他们认为他们需要额外的支持,以及如何最好地提供这种教学。方法:血友病护士在血红地平线组设计和试点一份问卷。该调查以纸质形式分发给参加2019年EAHAD大会的护士,并作为survey Monkey主办的在线调查进行推广。结果:欧洲护士回复75份(英国46份),智利和菲律宾护士回复2份。大多数人将自己的角色描述为“专业护士”,其中大多数人在血友病护理方面工作了长达十年。一半的人拥有护理学位,四分之一的人拥有护理文凭。四分之三的人参加了至少一门与血友病护理专门相关的课程。几乎所有人都使用学术资源、学习日和卫生专业组织的网站作为信息来源。大多数人也使用谷歌或维基百科,但很少有人使用Twitter。患者协会网站在非英国护士中更受欢迎。大约一半的人参加了赞助的专业会议,四分之三的人报告说,他们的工作场所有教育会议。大多数人更喜欢使用以患者为中心的内容进行互动和面对面的活动。结论:研究表明,护士,主要是在西欧,获得一系列的教育资源,其中大部分是“传统的”。在线资源的使用率很高,但社交媒体不如谷歌或维基百科受欢迎。需要进一步的研究来探索新媒体对血友病护士教育的潜力,以及调查中强调的当前教育水平和需求在整个欧洲是否仍然相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信