Identifying review spam with an unsupervised approach based on topic abuse

Jiandun Li, N. Li, Liu Yang, Pengpeng Zhang
{"title":"Identifying review spam with an unsupervised approach based on topic abuse","authors":"Jiandun Li, N. Li, Liu Yang, Pengpeng Zhang","doi":"10.1145/3532213.3532265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The harmfulness of review spam (also known as deceptive opinion) has long been recognized. However, due to the lack of supervised annotations, detecting these fake reviews is challenging ever since the dawn of this field. In this paper, by exploring distinct composing patterns between sincere reviewers and spammers, we propose a novel approach to examine review contents and hunt long spams. Correlation levels upon product metadata and nominated aspects are highlighted for feature selection. We take two highly acknowledged metrics, i.e., duplication and burstiness, to evaluate our approach. Comparative results upon the top two Chinese business-to-customer websites show that our approach is effective and outperforms state-of-the-art solutions.","PeriodicalId":333199,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3532213.3532265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The harmfulness of review spam (also known as deceptive opinion) has long been recognized. However, due to the lack of supervised annotations, detecting these fake reviews is challenging ever since the dawn of this field. In this paper, by exploring distinct composing patterns between sincere reviewers and spammers, we propose a novel approach to examine review contents and hunt long spams. Correlation levels upon product metadata and nominated aspects are highlighted for feature selection. We take two highly acknowledged metrics, i.e., duplication and burstiness, to evaluate our approach. Comparative results upon the top two Chinese business-to-customer websites show that our approach is effective and outperforms state-of-the-art solutions.
基于主题滥用的无监督方法识别评论垃圾邮件
垃圾评论(又称欺骗性意见)的危害性早已被认识到。然而,由于缺乏监督注释,从这个领域诞生之初,检测这些虚假评论就很有挑战性。本文通过探讨真诚的审稿人和垃圾邮件发送者之间不同的写作模式,提出了一种新的方法来检查审稿内容和搜索长垃圾邮件。在产品元数据和指定方面的相关水平突出显示特征选择。我们采用两个高度认可的指标,即重复和突发性来评估我们的方法。在中国排名前两位的企业对客户网站上的对比结果表明,我们的方法是有效的,并且优于最先进的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信