Comparative Study of Neural Networks and Decision Trees for Application in Trading Financial Futures

Saulius Blaziunas, A. Raudys
{"title":"Comparative Study of Neural Networks and Decision Trees for Application in Trading Financial Futures","authors":"Saulius Blaziunas, A. Raudys","doi":"10.1109/Deep-ML.2019.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to compare neural networks and decision trees in the ability to trade financial futures. Emphasis is made on correctness of comparison from practitioner's point of view. Contrary to other papers, we implemented actual trading strategy simulation with slippage and commission fees. Many research papers do not pay attention to correctness of experiments from practical point of view. Predictions are incorporated into trading algorithm and trading profits and Sharpe ratio are calculated. Experiments using 30 technical indicators and 45 different futures is repeated 16,895 times and evaluation is made using out of sample data. Results show that both methods have comparable accuracy and perform similarly.","PeriodicalId":228378,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Deep Learning and Machine Learning in Emerging Applications (Deep-ML)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Deep Learning and Machine Learning in Emerging Applications (Deep-ML)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Deep-ML.2019.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare neural networks and decision trees in the ability to trade financial futures. Emphasis is made on correctness of comparison from practitioner's point of view. Contrary to other papers, we implemented actual trading strategy simulation with slippage and commission fees. Many research papers do not pay attention to correctness of experiments from practical point of view. Predictions are incorporated into trading algorithm and trading profits and Sharpe ratio are calculated. Experiments using 30 technical indicators and 45 different futures is repeated 16,895 times and evaluation is made using out of sample data. Results show that both methods have comparable accuracy and perform similarly.
神经网络与决策树在金融期货交易中的比较研究
本文的目的是比较神经网络和决策树在金融期货交易能力方面的差异。从实践者的角度强调比较的正确性。与其他论文相反,我们实现了实际的交易策略模拟与滑点和佣金费用。许多研究论文从实践的角度不重视实验的正确性。将预测结果纳入交易算法,计算交易利润和夏普比率。实验采用30项技术指标和45种不同的期货,重复16895次,并使用样本外数据进行评价。结果表明,两种方法具有相当的精度和相似的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信