{"title":"Conscious rereading is confirmatory: Evidence from bidirectional self-paced\n reading","authors":"Dario Paape, S. Vasishth","doi":"10.5070/g6011182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rereading during sentence processing can be confirmatory, in which case it serves to\n increase readers' certainty in their current interpretation, or it can be\n revisionary, in which case it serves to correct a misinterpretation (Christianson,\n Luke, Hussey, & Wochna, 2017). The distinction is particularly relevant in\n garden-path sentences, which have been argued to trigger revisionary rereading\n (Frazier & Rayner, 1982). In two web-based experiments that compare\n garden-path sentences with other linguistic constructions, we investigate deliberate\n rereading in the recently-proposed bidirectional self-paced reading (BSPR) paradigm\n (Paape & Vasishth, 2022). Our results show evidence for selective rereading\n only in very difficult garden-path sentences. Additionally, our results suggest that\n conscious, selective rereading is confirmatory: Readers find garden-path sentences\n less rather than more acceptable after selective rereading, suggesting that they\n reread either to confirm their initial analysis or to confirm the perceived\n ungrammaticality of the sentence. We discuss the role of conscious awareness in\n dealing with different types of linguistic inconsistency.","PeriodicalId":164622,"journal":{"name":"Glossa Psycholinguistics","volume":"33 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glossa Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/g6011182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rereading during sentence processing can be confirmatory, in which case it serves to
increase readers' certainty in their current interpretation, or it can be
revisionary, in which case it serves to correct a misinterpretation (Christianson,
Luke, Hussey, & Wochna, 2017). The distinction is particularly relevant in
garden-path sentences, which have been argued to trigger revisionary rereading
(Frazier & Rayner, 1982). In two web-based experiments that compare
garden-path sentences with other linguistic constructions, we investigate deliberate
rereading in the recently-proposed bidirectional self-paced reading (BSPR) paradigm
(Paape & Vasishth, 2022). Our results show evidence for selective rereading
only in very difficult garden-path sentences. Additionally, our results suggest that
conscious, selective rereading is confirmatory: Readers find garden-path sentences
less rather than more acceptable after selective rereading, suggesting that they
reread either to confirm their initial analysis or to confirm the perceived
ungrammaticality of the sentence. We discuss the role of conscious awareness in
dealing with different types of linguistic inconsistency.