Estimates of Poverty and Inequality in the Districts of India, 2011–2012

S. Mohanty, D. Govil, R. Chauhan, Rockli Kim, S. Subramanian
{"title":"Estimates of Poverty and Inequality in the Districts of India, 2011–2012","authors":"S. Mohanty, D. Govil, R. Chauhan, Rockli Kim, S. Subramanian","doi":"10.1177/2455133316642338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Though the Census of India and large-scale demographic surveys have bridged the data gap on key demographic and health parameters, estimates on poverty and inequality remain deficient for the districts of India. The estimates on poverty and inequality indices across the states of India conceal large variations among districts. We use an innovative approach to provide consumption-based estimates of poverty and inequality indices in the districts of India by pooling the 66th and 68th rounds of consumption expenditure carried out by the National Sample Survey. The new official poverty line of 2009–2010 and 2011–2012 as recommended by the Rangarajan Committee and adopted by the Government of India is used in the estimation of poverty. A set of poverty and inequality indices, the poverty head count ratio, poverty gap square, the Gini index, Theil index and mean log deviation (MLD) are used to estimate poverty and inequality indices for 623 of the 640 districts in India. Estimates of poverty are obtained by pooling the estimates of 2009-10 and 2011-12. Results suggest wide variations in the level, depth and incidence of poverty among the districts of India irrespective of size, stage and governance in the states. The pattern of inequality is different from that of poverty; it is higher in districts with a higher level of development. Estimates of poverty are consistently correlated with wealth index, agricultural labour and female literacy. Among various factors, the fertility level, wealth index and the proportion of agricultural worker are significant predictors of poverty. Based on the findings, we suggest to increase the sample size to estimate consumption poverty in every alternate quinquennial survey and undertake a special round of survey in multidimensional poverty. Districts ranked low in poverty head count ratio should be accorded high priority in planning and program implementation.","PeriodicalId":243965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Policy and Practice","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133316642338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Abstract Though the Census of India and large-scale demographic surveys have bridged the data gap on key demographic and health parameters, estimates on poverty and inequality remain deficient for the districts of India. The estimates on poverty and inequality indices across the states of India conceal large variations among districts. We use an innovative approach to provide consumption-based estimates of poverty and inequality indices in the districts of India by pooling the 66th and 68th rounds of consumption expenditure carried out by the National Sample Survey. The new official poverty line of 2009–2010 and 2011–2012 as recommended by the Rangarajan Committee and adopted by the Government of India is used in the estimation of poverty. A set of poverty and inequality indices, the poverty head count ratio, poverty gap square, the Gini index, Theil index and mean log deviation (MLD) are used to estimate poverty and inequality indices for 623 of the 640 districts in India. Estimates of poverty are obtained by pooling the estimates of 2009-10 and 2011-12. Results suggest wide variations in the level, depth and incidence of poverty among the districts of India irrespective of size, stage and governance in the states. The pattern of inequality is different from that of poverty; it is higher in districts with a higher level of development. Estimates of poverty are consistently correlated with wealth index, agricultural labour and female literacy. Among various factors, the fertility level, wealth index and the proportion of agricultural worker are significant predictors of poverty. Based on the findings, we suggest to increase the sample size to estimate consumption poverty in every alternate quinquennial survey and undertake a special round of survey in multidimensional poverty. Districts ranked low in poverty head count ratio should be accorded high priority in planning and program implementation.
2011-2012年印度各区贫困与不平等估计
虽然印度人口普查和大规模人口调查已经弥合了关键人口和健康参数的数据差距,但印度各区对贫困和不平等的估计仍然不足。印度各邦对贫困和不平等指数的估计掩盖了各区之间的巨大差异。我们使用一种创新的方法,通过汇集全国抽样调查进行的第66轮和第68轮消费支出,为印度各区的贫困和不平等指数提供基于消费的估计。根据Rangarajan委员会建议并经印度政府通过的2009-2010年和2011-2012年新的官方贫困线用于估计贫困。一组贫困和不平等指数、贫困人口比率、贫困差距平方、基尼指数、泰尔指数和平均对数偏差(MLD)用于估计印度640个地区中623个地区的贫困和不平等指数。贫困估计数是通过汇总2009-10年和2011-12年的估计数得出的。结果表明,印度各区的贫困水平、深度和发生率存在很大差异,而与各邦的规模、阶段和治理无关。不平等的模式不同于贫穷的模式;在发展水平越高的地区,失业率越高。对贫困的估计始终与财富指数、农业劳动力和女性识字率相关。其中,生育率水平、财富指数和农业工人比例是贫困的显著预测因子。在此基础上,我们建议在每隔五年一次的调查中增加样本量来估计消费贫困,并对多维贫困进行一轮特别调查。贫困人口比率较低的地区在规划和方案实施方面应给予高度优先。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信