Guidelines for best practices in biometrics research

Anil K. Jain, Brendan Klare, A. Ross
{"title":"Guidelines for best practices in biometrics research","authors":"Anil K. Jain, Brendan Klare, A. Ross","doi":"10.1109/ICB.2015.7139116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biometric recognition has undoubtedly made great strides over the past 50 years. To ensure that current academic research in biometrics has a positive impact on future technological developments, this paper documents some guidelines encouraging researchers to focus on high-impact problems, develop solutions that are practically viable, report results using sound experimental and evaluation protocols, and justify claims based on verifiable facts. The intent is to ensure that methods and results published in the literature have been properly evaluated and are practically feasible for automated or semi-automated human recognition. It is believed that following these guidelines will avoid inflated claims and support published research on a legitimate foundation that can be embraced by practitioners and peers in biometrics and related scientific disciplines (e.g, forensic science).","PeriodicalId":237372,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICB.2015.7139116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Biometric recognition has undoubtedly made great strides over the past 50 years. To ensure that current academic research in biometrics has a positive impact on future technological developments, this paper documents some guidelines encouraging researchers to focus on high-impact problems, develop solutions that are practically viable, report results using sound experimental and evaluation protocols, and justify claims based on verifiable facts. The intent is to ensure that methods and results published in the literature have been properly evaluated and are practically feasible for automated or semi-automated human recognition. It is believed that following these guidelines will avoid inflated claims and support published research on a legitimate foundation that can be embraced by practitioners and peers in biometrics and related scientific disciplines (e.g, forensic science).
生物计量学研究最佳实践指南
在过去的50年里,生物识别技术无疑取得了巨大的进步。为了确保当前的生物识别学术研究对未来的技术发展产生积极影响,本文记录了一些指导方针,鼓励研究人员关注高影响问题,开发实际可行的解决方案,使用合理的实验和评估协议报告结果,并基于可验证的事实证明主张。目的是确保在文献中发表的方法和结果已被适当评估,并且对于自动化或半自动人类识别实际上是可行的。据信,遵循这些准则将避免夸大的主张,并支持在合法基础上发表的研究,这些研究可以被生物识别学和相关科学学科(例如法医学)的从业者和同行所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信