Strategies and scenarios of CSRF attacks against the CAPTCHA forms

Hossein Moradi, Hossein Kardan Moghaddam
{"title":"Strategies and scenarios of CSRF attacks against the CAPTCHA forms","authors":"Hossein Moradi, Hossein Kardan Moghaddam","doi":"10.14419/JACST.V4I1.3935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we’ve tried to examine the hypothesis of the robustness of a form by using CAPTCHA against CSRF and login CSRF attacks. Our investigations showed that unlike public opinion, common attacks to bypass CAPTCHAs such as Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and 3rd party human attacks are not applicable in the CSRF case and instead, Clickjacking is the most important scenario of CSRF and login CSRF attacks against a secure session-dependent CAPTCHA form. Remember that the Clickjacking is also applicable to bypass the well-known CSRF protections, such as the secret token and the Referer header. Therefore, although the frequent application of CAPTCHA on every page of a website negatively impacts the user experience, but the robustness of a robust session-dependent CAPTCHA against the CSRF and login CSRF attacks is almost the same as the session-dependent security token. Moreover, when a website is using a session-independent or week pattern of CAPTCHA, attackers can bypass the CAPTCHAs and launch the CSRF or login CSRF attacks by using XSS, session hijacking, replay attacks or submitting a random response.","PeriodicalId":445404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology","volume":"44 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14419/JACST.V4I1.3935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this article, we’ve tried to examine the hypothesis of the robustness of a form by using CAPTCHA against CSRF and login CSRF attacks. Our investigations showed that unlike public opinion, common attacks to bypass CAPTCHAs such as Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and 3rd party human attacks are not applicable in the CSRF case and instead, Clickjacking is the most important scenario of CSRF and login CSRF attacks against a secure session-dependent CAPTCHA form. Remember that the Clickjacking is also applicable to bypass the well-known CSRF protections, such as the secret token and the Referer header. Therefore, although the frequent application of CAPTCHA on every page of a website negatively impacts the user experience, but the robustness of a robust session-dependent CAPTCHA against the CSRF and login CSRF attacks is almost the same as the session-dependent security token. Moreover, when a website is using a session-independent or week pattern of CAPTCHA, attackers can bypass the CAPTCHAs and launch the CSRF or login CSRF attacks by using XSS, session hijacking, replay attacks or submitting a random response.
针对CAPTCHA表单的CSRF攻击策略和场景
在本文中,我们尝试通过使用CAPTCHA对抗CSRF和登录CSRF攻击来检验表单健壮性的假设。我们的调查表明,与公众的看法不同,绕过CAPTCHA的常见攻击(如光学字符识别(OCR)和第三方人工攻击)不适用于CSRF案例,相反,Clickjacking是CSRF和登录CSRF攻击中最重要的场景,针对安全会话依赖的CAPTCHA表单。请记住,Clickjacking也适用于绕过众所周知的CSRF保护,例如秘密令牌和Referer标头。因此,尽管频繁地在网站的每个页面上应用CAPTCHA会对用户体验产生负面影响,但是一个健壮的会话依赖的CAPTCHA对CSRF和登录CSRF攻击的鲁棒性几乎与会话依赖的安全令牌相同。此外,当网站使用会话无关或周模式的CAPTCHA时,攻击者可以绕过CAPTCHA,通过XSS、会话劫持、重放攻击或提交随机响应来发起CSRF或登录CSRF攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信