Internet multicast provisioning issues for hierarchical architecture

Ki-Il Kim, J. Ha, Eun-Hee Hyun, Sang-Ha Kim
{"title":"Internet multicast provisioning issues for hierarchical architecture","authors":"Ki-Il Kim, J. Ha, Eun-Hee Hyun, Sang-Ha Kim","doi":"10.1109/ICON.2001.962375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ASM (any source multicast) have been proposed to forward IP multicast datagram. However, there remain unsolved deployment issues such as network management and address allocation of multicast sessions. To overcome the above issues, largely new three multicast mechanisms-SGM (Small Group Multicast), ALM (Application Level Multicast) and SSM (Source Specific Multicast)-have been proposed. While the SGM and ALM can support multicast service without constructing the multicast routing tree, SSM constructs the multicast routing tree rooted in the source. SGM is proposed to support a very large number of small multicast groups. However, since SGM needs an additional packet header to service multicast, modification of the legacy routers is inevitable. ALM provides multicast by means of a combination of unicast in WAN and multicast in LAN. Since the standard is not fixed, this mechanism has limited implementation conditions. SSM identifies the multicast session not by G but by (S, G) pair. This mechanism solves the multicast address allocation problem, which is the biggest issue in the ASM. However, all routers along the delivery path must maintain the state (S, G) in order to transmit multicast data. Though the three new mechanisms can solve the many of the problems, one feature of ASM, the scalability problem is not be removed at all. We propose a fast deployment mechanism, which is based on SSM as well as the use the Internet hierarchical architecture. This mechanism may help multicast deployment without any modification of the IP layer while the advantage of SSM is kept. A key feature of the new mechanism is the use of a different multicast service for macro level multicast and micro level multicast.","PeriodicalId":178842,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON 2001.","volume":"26 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON 2001.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICON.2001.962375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The ASM (any source multicast) have been proposed to forward IP multicast datagram. However, there remain unsolved deployment issues such as network management and address allocation of multicast sessions. To overcome the above issues, largely new three multicast mechanisms-SGM (Small Group Multicast), ALM (Application Level Multicast) and SSM (Source Specific Multicast)-have been proposed. While the SGM and ALM can support multicast service without constructing the multicast routing tree, SSM constructs the multicast routing tree rooted in the source. SGM is proposed to support a very large number of small multicast groups. However, since SGM needs an additional packet header to service multicast, modification of the legacy routers is inevitable. ALM provides multicast by means of a combination of unicast in WAN and multicast in LAN. Since the standard is not fixed, this mechanism has limited implementation conditions. SSM identifies the multicast session not by G but by (S, G) pair. This mechanism solves the multicast address allocation problem, which is the biggest issue in the ASM. However, all routers along the delivery path must maintain the state (S, G) in order to transmit multicast data. Though the three new mechanisms can solve the many of the problems, one feature of ASM, the scalability problem is not be removed at all. We propose a fast deployment mechanism, which is based on SSM as well as the use the Internet hierarchical architecture. This mechanism may help multicast deployment without any modification of the IP layer while the advantage of SSM is kept. A key feature of the new mechanism is the use of a different multicast service for macro level multicast and micro level multicast.
分层体系结构的因特网多播供应问题
ASM(任意源组播)被提出用于转发IP组播数据报。但是,在网络管理和多播会话的地址分配等部署问题上还没有得到解决。为了克服上述问题,已经提出了三种新的组播机制——sgm (Small Group multicast)、ALM (Application Level multicast)和SSM (Source Specific multicast)。SGM和ALM不需要构建组播路由树就可以支持组播业务,而SSM则从源中构建组播路由树。提出SGM是为了支持非常多的小型组播组。然而,由于SGM需要一个额外的包头来服务多播,因此修改传统路由器是不可避免的。ALM通过广域网中的单播和局域网中的组播相结合的方式提供组播。由于标准不是固定的,因此该机制的实现条件有限。SSM不是通过G,而是通过(S, G)对来标识组播会话。该机制解决了ASM中最大的组播地址分配问题。但是,为了传输组播数据,传输路径上的所有路由器必须保持状态(S, G)。虽然这三种新机制可以解决许多问题,但ASM的一个特点是,可伸缩性问题根本没有消除。提出了一种基于SSM的快速部署机制,该机制采用Internet分层结构。该机制可以在不改变IP层的情况下实现组播部署,同时又保持了SSM的优势。新机制的一个关键特征是宏级组播和微级组播使用不同的组播服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信