B. Akinnuwesi, S. Fashoto, Elliot Mbunge, Petros Mashwama, P. Owate
{"title":"A SWOT Analysis of Software Requirement Validation Techniques","authors":"B. Akinnuwesi, S. Fashoto, Elliot Mbunge, Petros Mashwama, P. Owate","doi":"10.4018/ijsi.297132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing software requirement validation (SRV) techniques are theoretical concepts with no real-life application. No report on what could be considered as the best of the SRV techniques. Our study focus on systematic literature review of existing SRV techniques, emphasizing on their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) as well as the involvement of end-users in SRV process. We opined to identify SRV technique(s) that could be considered best and user-centric. Four hundred and twenty-four articles were identified initially but after applying the exclusion criteria, 59 articles were identified for review. We defined one generic research question (GRQ) and five specific research questions (SRQi, i = 1,2,3,4,5) to guide our review and provide the required details for SWOT analysis of SRV techniques. A software is yet to be developed for users’ requirements validation both on a small and larg scale and none of the SRV techniques incorporate user story framework.","PeriodicalId":396598,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Softw. Innov.","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Softw. Innov.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsi.297132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Existing software requirement validation (SRV) techniques are theoretical concepts with no real-life application. No report on what could be considered as the best of the SRV techniques. Our study focus on systematic literature review of existing SRV techniques, emphasizing on their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) as well as the involvement of end-users in SRV process. We opined to identify SRV technique(s) that could be considered best and user-centric. Four hundred and twenty-four articles were identified initially but after applying the exclusion criteria, 59 articles were identified for review. We defined one generic research question (GRQ) and five specific research questions (SRQi, i = 1,2,3,4,5) to guide our review and provide the required details for SWOT analysis of SRV techniques. A software is yet to be developed for users’ requirements validation both on a small and larg scale and none of the SRV techniques incorporate user story framework.
现有的软件需求验证(SRV)技术是没有实际应用的理论概念。没有关于什么可以被认为是最好的SRV技术的报告。我们的研究重点是对现有的SRV技术进行系统的文献综述,强调它们的优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)以及最终用户在SRV过程中的参与。我们认为确定SRV技术可以被认为是最好的和以用户为中心的。最初确定了424篇文章,但在应用排除标准后,确定了59篇文章进行审查。我们定义了一个通用研究问题(GRQ)和五个具体研究问题(SRQi, i = 1,2,3,4,5)来指导我们的审查,并为SRV技术的SWOT分析提供所需的细节。一个软件还没有被开发出来用于用户的需求验证,无论是小规模的还是大规模的,而且没有一个SRV技术包含用户故事框架。