Neuroplasticity in children and adolescents in response to treatment intervention: A systematic review of the literature

L. Weyandt, Christine Clarkin, E. Holding, S. May, Marisa E. Marraccini, B. G. Gudmundsdottir, E. Shepard, Lauren Thompson
{"title":"Neuroplasticity in children and adolescents in response to treatment intervention: A systematic review of the literature","authors":"L. Weyandt, Christine Clarkin, E. Holding, S. May, Marisa E. Marraccini, B. G. Gudmundsdottir, E. Shepard, Lauren Thompson","doi":"10.1177/2514183X20974231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, regarding evidence of neuroplasticity in children and adolescents in response to cognitive or sensory-motor interventions. Twenty-eight studies employing seven different types of neuroimaging techniques were included in the review. Findings revealed that significant variability existed across the 28 studies with regard to the clinical populations examined, type of interventions employed, neuroimaging methods, and the type of neuroimaging data included in the studies. Overall, results supported that experience-dependent interventions were associated with neuroplastic changes among children and adolescents in both neurotypical and clinical populations. However, it remains unclear whether these molecular neuroplastic changes, including the degree and direction of those differences, were the direct result of the intervention. Although the findings are encouraging, methodological limitations of the studies limit clinical utility of the results. Future studies are warranted that rigorously define the construct of neuroplasticity, establish consistent protocols across measurement techniques, and have adequate statistical power. Lastly, studies are needed to identify the functional and structural neuroplastic mechanisms that correspond with changes in cognition and behavior in child and adolescent samples.","PeriodicalId":242430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","volume":"25 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183X20974231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, regarding evidence of neuroplasticity in children and adolescents in response to cognitive or sensory-motor interventions. Twenty-eight studies employing seven different types of neuroimaging techniques were included in the review. Findings revealed that significant variability existed across the 28 studies with regard to the clinical populations examined, type of interventions employed, neuroimaging methods, and the type of neuroimaging data included in the studies. Overall, results supported that experience-dependent interventions were associated with neuroplastic changes among children and adolescents in both neurotypical and clinical populations. However, it remains unclear whether these molecular neuroplastic changes, including the degree and direction of those differences, were the direct result of the intervention. Although the findings are encouraging, methodological limitations of the studies limit clinical utility of the results. Future studies are warranted that rigorously define the construct of neuroplasticity, establish consistent protocols across measurement techniques, and have adequate statistical power. Lastly, studies are needed to identify the functional and structural neuroplastic mechanisms that correspond with changes in cognition and behavior in child and adolescent samples.
儿童和青少年的神经可塑性对治疗干预的反应:文献的系统回顾
本研究的目的是对文献进行系统回顾,遵循PRISMA指南,关于儿童和青少年对认知或感觉运动干预的神经可塑性的证据。采用7种不同类型的神经成像技术的28项研究被纳入综述。研究结果显示,在28项研究中,在临床检查人群、采用的干预措施类型、神经影像学方法和研究中包括的神经影像学数据类型方面存在显著差异。总的来说,结果支持经验依赖干预与神经正常和临床人群中儿童和青少年的神经可塑性变化有关。然而,目前尚不清楚这些分子神经可塑性的改变,包括这些差异的程度和方向,是否是干预的直接结果。尽管研究结果令人鼓舞,但方法上的局限性限制了研究结果的临床应用。未来的研究需要严格定义神经可塑性的结构,建立跨测量技术的一致协议,并具有足够的统计能力。最后,需要研究确定与儿童和青少年样本的认知和行为变化相对应的功能和结构神经可塑性机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信