Machine Learning vs Deterministic Rule-Based System for Document Stream Segmentation

Ahmed Hamdi, J. Voerman, Mickaël Coustaty, Aurélie Joseph, V. P. d'Andecy, J. Ogier
{"title":"Machine Learning vs Deterministic Rule-Based System for Document Stream Segmentation","authors":"Ahmed Hamdi, J. Voerman, Mickaël Coustaty, Aurélie Joseph, V. P. d'Andecy, J. Ogier","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.2017.332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical document stream Segmentation methods rely on physical separators (white pages, pages with a specific stamp, etc) to automatically split documents from the stream (detecting the beginning and the ending of documents). In order to reduce costly efforts, a recent work using a contextual rulebased approach was proposed to automate this process. Such rules tend to detect continuity, rupture or uncertainty between pairs of pages. Even if these first results were encouraging, performance remained unsatisfactory. In this context, we propose to compare this existing rule-based approach to a machine learningmethod basedon Doc2Vecsoas toevaluate andcompare their strengths and weaknesses. This study was led on a corpus of more than 4,000 real administrative documents composed of more than 8,000 pages. The machine learning approach gives better results on multipage documents while the rule-based method performs best with single page documents.","PeriodicalId":433676,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","volume":"BME-26 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2017.332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Classical document stream Segmentation methods rely on physical separators (white pages, pages with a specific stamp, etc) to automatically split documents from the stream (detecting the beginning and the ending of documents). In order to reduce costly efforts, a recent work using a contextual rulebased approach was proposed to automate this process. Such rules tend to detect continuity, rupture or uncertainty between pairs of pages. Even if these first results were encouraging, performance remained unsatisfactory. In this context, we propose to compare this existing rule-based approach to a machine learningmethod basedon Doc2Vecsoas toevaluate andcompare their strengths and weaknesses. This study was led on a corpus of more than 4,000 real administrative documents composed of more than 8,000 pages. The machine learning approach gives better results on multipage documents while the rule-based method performs best with single page documents.
机器学习与基于确定性规则的文档流分割系统
经典的文档流分割方法依赖于物理分隔符(白页、带有特定戳的页面等)来自动从流中分割文档(检测文档的开始和结束)。为了减少昂贵的工作,最近提出了使用基于上下文规则的方法来自动化此过程的工作。这些规则倾向于检测页面对之间的连续性、断裂性或不确定性。尽管这些初步结果令人鼓舞,但业绩仍不尽人意。在这种情况下,我们建议将这种现有的基于规则的方法与基于Doc2Vecsoas的机器学习方法进行比较,以评估和比较它们的优缺点。这项研究是在4000多份实际行政文件的语料库上进行的,这些文件有8000多页。机器学习方法在处理多页文档时效果更好,而基于规则的方法在处理单页文档时效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信