Impacto da lombalgia nas atividades de vida diária e na qualidade de vida de gestantes

Poliana de Jesus Santos, Sarah Lísia da Silva, Guilherme Rodrigues Barbosa, Ana Silvia Moccellin
{"title":"Impacto da lombalgia nas atividades de vida diária e na qualidade de vida de gestantes","authors":"Poliana de Jesus Santos, Sarah Lísia da Silva, Guilherme Rodrigues Barbosa, Ana Silvia Moccellin","doi":"10.15448/1983-652X.2017.3.25476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the number of pregnant women with low back pain and its characteristics, to identify the impact on activities of daily living and to correlate the functional disability degree with the quality of life in pregnant women at first and second trimester. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study that was performed with pregnant women attended in a maternity at Lagarto/SE. The evaluation of disability induced by low back pain was performed by the Roland-Morris questionnaire and the evaluation of the quality of life was made by the Medical Outcomes Study-36. Results: The sample was divided at first (GI; n=19) and second trimester (GII; n=19). The prevalence of low back pain was 84.2% in GI and 78.9% in GII (p=0.334). The pain started during pregnancy in 75% in GI and in 73.3% in GII (p=0.784). Regarding the factors that worsed the pain, 62.5% in GI and 33.3% in GII reported that they stay in the same position and. In order to decrease the pain, the rest was the factor most cited in the groups (p<0.001). In the Roland-Morris questionnaire, the average score was 7.16±4.80 in GI and 7.79±5.55 in GII. In the quality of life assessment, the most affected domains were the vitality in GI (51.32±21.27) (p=0.484) and the limitation by emotional aspects in GII (52.63±43.48) (p=0.623). The less affected domains were functional ability in GI (70±29.11) (p=0.784) and social aspects in GII (73.68±32.78) (p=0.661). Conclusion: The gestational low back pain mainly affects primigravidae and young women, interferes with vitality and emotional aspects, causing impacts in activities of daily living. However, the pain does not disable the pregnant women during the first and second trimesters.","PeriodicalId":193622,"journal":{"name":"Ciência & Saúde","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciência & Saúde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-652X.2017.3.25476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the number of pregnant women with low back pain and its characteristics, to identify the impact on activities of daily living and to correlate the functional disability degree with the quality of life in pregnant women at first and second trimester. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study that was performed with pregnant women attended in a maternity at Lagarto/SE. The evaluation of disability induced by low back pain was performed by the Roland-Morris questionnaire and the evaluation of the quality of life was made by the Medical Outcomes Study-36. Results: The sample was divided at first (GI; n=19) and second trimester (GII; n=19). The prevalence of low back pain was 84.2% in GI and 78.9% in GII (p=0.334). The pain started during pregnancy in 75% in GI and in 73.3% in GII (p=0.784). Regarding the factors that worsed the pain, 62.5% in GI and 33.3% in GII reported that they stay in the same position and. In order to decrease the pain, the rest was the factor most cited in the groups (p<0.001). In the Roland-Morris questionnaire, the average score was 7.16±4.80 in GI and 7.79±5.55 in GII. In the quality of life assessment, the most affected domains were the vitality in GI (51.32±21.27) (p=0.484) and the limitation by emotional aspects in GII (52.63±43.48) (p=0.623). The less affected domains were functional ability in GI (70±29.11) (p=0.784) and social aspects in GII (73.68±32.78) (p=0.661). Conclusion: The gestational low back pain mainly affects primigravidae and young women, interferes with vitality and emotional aspects, causing impacts in activities of daily living. However, the pain does not disable the pregnant women during the first and second trimesters.
下腰痛对孕妇日常生活活动和生活质量的影响
目的:分析妊娠早期和中期腰痛孕妇的发病人数及其特点,了解腰痛对孕妇日常生活活动的影响及功能障碍程度与孕妇生活质量的关系。材料和方法:对在Lagarto/SE产科就诊的孕妇进行横断面、观察性和描述性研究。腰痛致残评估采用Roland-Morris问卷,生活质量评估采用Medical Outcomes Study-36。结果:首先进行了分样(GI;n=19)和妊娠中期(GII;n = 19)。GI组腰痛发生率为84.2%,GII组为78.9% (p=0.334)。妊娠期疼痛发生率为75%,妊娠期为73.3% (p=0.784)。至于加重疼痛的因素,62.5%的GI组和33.3%的GI组报告他们保持相同的姿势和。为了减轻疼痛,休息是各组中引用最多的因素(p<0.001)。在Roland-Morris问卷中,GI平均得分为7.16±4.80,GII平均得分为7.79±5.55。在生活质量评价中,受影响最大的领域是GI中的活力(51.32±21.27)(p=0.484)和GII中的情绪(52.63±43.48)(p=0.623)。功能方面(70±29.11)(p=0.784)和社会方面(73.68±32.78)(p=0.661)受影响较小。结论:妊娠期腰痛主要影响初产妇和年轻女性,影响活力和情绪,影响日常生活活动。然而,在妊娠的前三个月和中期,疼痛不会使孕妇残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信