Economic Analysis in Fiduciary Monitoring Disputes Following the Supreme Court's 'Tibble' Ruling

D. Heavner, Susan M. Mangiero
{"title":"Economic Analysis in Fiduciary Monitoring Disputes Following the Supreme Court's 'Tibble' Ruling","authors":"D. Heavner, Susan M. Mangiero","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2630462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fiduciary monitoring has become a hot topic as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Tibble v. Edison International, according to recent expert insights published by Analysis Group Managing Principal D. Lee Heavner and Fiduciary Leadership LLC Managing Director and Analysis Group affiliate Susan Mangiero. The Tibble ruling, which stated that plan fiduciaries have a responsibility to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, is important because of the amount of assets in ERISA retirement plans – approximately $7 trillion as of 2012, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. This decision also comes against a backdrop of growing ERISA litigation. In 2014 alone, ERISA litigation settlements exceeded $1.4 billion, according to Benefits Pro, and this amount excludes the substantial legal costs of defending the cases. In the recent article “Economic Analysis in Fiduciary Monitoring Disputes Following the Supreme Court’s ‘Tibble’ Ruling” (Bloomberg BNA’s Pensions & Benefits Daily, June 24, 2015), Dr. Heavner and Dr. Mangiero explain that what constitutes a reasonable monitoring process may be influenced by plan- and investment-specific factors, as well as by the expected benefits and costs of different monitoring activities. “The monitoring of investments is a broad and complex topic. There is no uniform process that is appropriate in every situation. To the contrary, the list of potentially relevant risk factors is long and subject to revision as circumstances change.” The authors also discuss how complexities arise when calculating economic damages due to the wide array of alternative actions and the substantial variation in timing that may be consistent with a prudent monitoring process.“These are important issues that plan sponsors, fiduciaries, and ERISA lawyers and experts will have to address if, as expected, further challenges to fiduciary monitoring of investments emerge post-Tibble,” said Dr. Heavner.","PeriodicalId":182251,"journal":{"name":"FinPlanRN: Wills & Trusts (Topic)","volume":"38 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FinPlanRN: Wills & Trusts (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2630462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fiduciary monitoring has become a hot topic as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Tibble v. Edison International, according to recent expert insights published by Analysis Group Managing Principal D. Lee Heavner and Fiduciary Leadership LLC Managing Director and Analysis Group affiliate Susan Mangiero. The Tibble ruling, which stated that plan fiduciaries have a responsibility to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, is important because of the amount of assets in ERISA retirement plans – approximately $7 trillion as of 2012, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. This decision also comes against a backdrop of growing ERISA litigation. In 2014 alone, ERISA litigation settlements exceeded $1.4 billion, according to Benefits Pro, and this amount excludes the substantial legal costs of defending the cases. In the recent article “Economic Analysis in Fiduciary Monitoring Disputes Following the Supreme Court’s ‘Tibble’ Ruling” (Bloomberg BNA’s Pensions & Benefits Daily, June 24, 2015), Dr. Heavner and Dr. Mangiero explain that what constitutes a reasonable monitoring process may be influenced by plan- and investment-specific factors, as well as by the expected benefits and costs of different monitoring activities. “The monitoring of investments is a broad and complex topic. There is no uniform process that is appropriate in every situation. To the contrary, the list of potentially relevant risk factors is long and subject to revision as circumstances change.” The authors also discuss how complexities arise when calculating economic damages due to the wide array of alternative actions and the substantial variation in timing that may be consistent with a prudent monitoring process.“These are important issues that plan sponsors, fiduciaries, and ERISA lawyers and experts will have to address if, as expected, further challenges to fiduciary monitoring of investments emerge post-Tibble,” said Dr. Heavner.
最高法院“蒂布尔”判决后受托监督纠纷的经济分析
根据Analysis Group管理负责人D. Lee Heavner和fiducary Leadership LLC董事总经理兼Analysis Group附属公司Susan Mangiero最近发布的专家见解,由于美国最高法院对Tibble诉爱迪生国际(Edison International)一案的裁决,受托监督已成为一个热门话题。蒂布尔的裁决指出,计划受托人有责任监督投资并撤掉不谨慎的投资。根据美国劳工部的数据,截至2012年,ERISA退休计划的资产总额约为7万亿美元,因此这项裁决很重要。这一决定也是在ERISA诉讼日益增多的背景下做出的。根据Benefits Pro的数据,仅在2014年,ERISA诉讼和解金额就超过了14亿美元,这还不包括为这些案件辩护的巨额法律费用。Heavner博士和Mangiero博士在最近的一篇文章《最高法院“Tibble”裁决后受托监督纠纷的经济分析》(Bloomberg BNA的养老金与福利日报,2015年6月24日)中解释说,合理的监督过程可能受到计划和投资特定因素的影响,以及不同监督活动的预期收益和成本。“对投资的监控是一个广泛而复杂的话题。没有适用于每种情况的统一过程。相反,潜在相关风险因素的清单很长,可能会随着情况的变化而修改。”作者还讨论了在计算经济损失时,由于各种各样的替代行动和可能与谨慎的监测过程一致的时间上的实质性变化而产生的复杂性。“这些都是计划发起人、受托人、ERISA律师和专家必须解决的重要问题,如果像预期的那样,信托监督投资的挑战出现在tibble之后,”Heavner博士说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信