{"title":"Moving into Feature Filmmaking","authors":"B. Lupack","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501748189.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at a controversial release by the Wharton brothers: the five-reel feature The Black Stork (1917). Advertised as a “eugenics love story,” the film told a fictionalized story based on the actual 1915 “Bollinger Case,” in which Dr. Harry J. Haiselden, the chief surgeon at the German-American Hospital in Chicago, refused to perform a life-saving surgery on a severely disabled infant, “Baby [John] Bollinger.” Hoping to clear himself before the American public, Haiselden decided to participate, and even to star, in The Black Stork. In addition to its central premise that it is necessary, even laudable, to ensure the integrity of society by terminating the lives of “defectives,” the film drew a further direct and unfortunate link between hereditary defects and ethnicity, class, and race. The chapter also considers the first new Wharton production of 1917, The Great White Trail. The film was less controversial than The Black Stork, but its subplot of white slavery and prostitution also elicited some concerns.","PeriodicalId":345348,"journal":{"name":"Silent Serial Sensations","volume":"108 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Silent Serial Sensations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501748189.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter looks at a controversial release by the Wharton brothers: the five-reel feature The Black Stork (1917). Advertised as a “eugenics love story,” the film told a fictionalized story based on the actual 1915 “Bollinger Case,” in which Dr. Harry J. Haiselden, the chief surgeon at the German-American Hospital in Chicago, refused to perform a life-saving surgery on a severely disabled infant, “Baby [John] Bollinger.” Hoping to clear himself before the American public, Haiselden decided to participate, and even to star, in The Black Stork. In addition to its central premise that it is necessary, even laudable, to ensure the integrity of society by terminating the lives of “defectives,” the film drew a further direct and unfortunate link between hereditary defects and ethnicity, class, and race. The chapter also considers the first new Wharton production of 1917, The Great White Trail. The film was less controversial than The Black Stork, but its subplot of white slavery and prostitution also elicited some concerns.
本章着眼于沃顿兄弟发行的一部有争议的影片:五卷故事片《黑鹳》(the Black Stork, 1917)。这部电影被宣传为“优生学爱情故事”,讲述了一个虚构的故事,基于1915年的真实故事“博林格案”,在这个故事中,芝加哥德美医院的首席外科医生哈里·j·海塞尔登(Harry J. Haiselden)医生拒绝为一名严重残疾的婴儿“婴儿(约翰)博林格”进行拯救生命的手术。为了在美国公众面前澄清自己的清白,海塞尔登决定参加《黑鹳》,甚至出演这部电影。这部电影的核心前提是,通过终结“缺陷”的生命来确保社会的完整性是必要的,甚至是值得称赞的,除此之外,它还进一步将遗传缺陷与民族、阶级和种族之间直接而不幸的联系起来。这一章还讨论了1917年沃顿商学院的第一部新作《白色巨径》。这部电影没有《黑鹳》那么有争议,但它关于白奴和卖淫的次要情节也引起了一些关注。