Working Paper 37: The Green Corruption paradox

J. Grossmann, Taradhinta Suryandari, Rizka Halida
{"title":"Working Paper 37: The Green Corruption paradox","authors":"J. Grossmann, Taradhinta Suryandari, Rizka Halida","doi":"10.12685/bigwp.2021.37.1-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Working Paper details the findings of a survey of Indonesians’ perceptions of corruption, the economy and the environment in July 2021. \nThe survey was a joint initiative of the Green Corruption team at the Basel Institute on Governance and leading Indonesian pollster Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI). It consisted of a national public opinion survey covering 2,580 respondents and in-depth interviews with 30 private-sector representatives working in various natural resource sectors. \nThe survey reveals what we call the Green Corruption paradox: Conflicting, and arguably mutually exclusive, views on all three topics can co-exist. Despite seeing the presence of and being deeply concerned about corruption and environmental degradation, people tend to focus on livelihoods when times are hard.  \nPeople also, according to the survey data, favour economic structures that appear to channel the benefits of natural resource utilisation more directly to citizens. In Indonesia, this means rejecting private companies – particularly foreign-owned – in favour of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and people’s cooperatives. \nThe report ends with five key recommendations that can inform Indonesian policy and the interventions of donors and civil society organisations concerned with conservation, anti-corruption and sustainable development. \nThis research was made possible with the generous support of the American people through the USAID CEGAH programme.","PeriodicalId":447485,"journal":{"name":"Basel Institute on Governance Working Papers","volume":"261 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basel Institute on Governance Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12685/bigwp.2021.37.1-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Working Paper details the findings of a survey of Indonesians’ perceptions of corruption, the economy and the environment in July 2021. The survey was a joint initiative of the Green Corruption team at the Basel Institute on Governance and leading Indonesian pollster Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI). It consisted of a national public opinion survey covering 2,580 respondents and in-depth interviews with 30 private-sector representatives working in various natural resource sectors. The survey reveals what we call the Green Corruption paradox: Conflicting, and arguably mutually exclusive, views on all three topics can co-exist. Despite seeing the presence of and being deeply concerned about corruption and environmental degradation, people tend to focus on livelihoods when times are hard.  People also, according to the survey data, favour economic structures that appear to channel the benefits of natural resource utilisation more directly to citizens. In Indonesia, this means rejecting private companies – particularly foreign-owned – in favour of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and people’s cooperatives. The report ends with five key recommendations that can inform Indonesian policy and the interventions of donors and civil society organisations concerned with conservation, anti-corruption and sustainable development. This research was made possible with the generous support of the American people through the USAID CEGAH programme.
工作文件37:绿色腐败悖论
本工作文件详细介绍了2021年7月印度尼西亚人对腐败、经济和环境看法的调查结果。这项调查是巴塞尔治理研究所绿色腐败小组和印度尼西亚主要民意调查机构印度尼西亚民意调查机构(LSI)联合发起的。它包括一项全国民意调查,涉及2 580名答复者,并与在各种自然资源部门工作的30名私营部门代表进行深入访谈。这项调查揭示了我们所说的绿色腐败悖论:对这三个主题的观点相互矛盾,甚至可以说是相互排斥,但却可以共存。尽管看到了腐败和环境恶化的存在并深感担忧,但人们往往在困难时期关注生计。调查数据还显示,人们青睐那些似乎能更直接地将自然资源利用带来的好处传递给公民的经济结构。在印度尼西亚,这意味着拒绝私营企业——尤其是外资企业——而支持国有企业和人民合作社。该报告最后提出了5项关键建议,可以为印尼的政策以及关注保护、反腐败和可持续发展的捐助者和民间社会组织的干预措施提供信息。这项研究是在美国人民通过美国国际开发署ceegah方案的慷慨支持下得以实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信