Decision-making in engineering - a call for affective engineering dimensions in applied engineering design and design sciences

Stephanie Balters, M. Steinert
{"title":"Decision-making in engineering - a call for affective engineering dimensions in applied engineering design and design sciences","authors":"Stephanie Balters, M. Steinert","doi":"10.1109/IDAM.2014.6912663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper counters the prevalent cognitive engineering decision-making paradigm by introducing fundamental and hitherto unaccounted results from neuroscience into the discussion: firstly decision-making is a process that is influenced by emotional (somatic marker) signals, secondly regulation of emotion is essential for rational decision-making, and thirdly decisions are made on subconscious level before we become consciously aware. These insights have a potentially tremendous impact onto how we model and incorporate decision-making in engineering sciences. Thus, the authors believe that it is high time to research and develop affective engineering dimensions. Hence inspired by new insights from neuroscience, we are calling to reconsider the rational and conscious decision-making foundation of modem engineering by posing a new hypothesis: Engineering decisions are per se non-rational and/or unconscious.","PeriodicalId":135246,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing (ICIDM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing (ICIDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAM.2014.6912663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper counters the prevalent cognitive engineering decision-making paradigm by introducing fundamental and hitherto unaccounted results from neuroscience into the discussion: firstly decision-making is a process that is influenced by emotional (somatic marker) signals, secondly regulation of emotion is essential for rational decision-making, and thirdly decisions are made on subconscious level before we become consciously aware. These insights have a potentially tremendous impact onto how we model and incorporate decision-making in engineering sciences. Thus, the authors believe that it is high time to research and develop affective engineering dimensions. Hence inspired by new insights from neuroscience, we are calling to reconsider the rational and conscious decision-making foundation of modem engineering by posing a new hypothesis: Engineering decisions are per se non-rational and/or unconscious.
工程决策——在应用工程设计和设计科学中对情感工程维度的呼唤
本文通过引入神经科学的基本和迄今为止未被解释的结果来反驳流行的认知工程决策范式:首先,决策是一个受情绪(体细胞标记)信号影响的过程,其次,情绪调节对于理性决策至关重要,第三,决策是在我们有意识之前在潜意识层面做出的。这些见解对我们如何在工程科学中建模和整合决策具有潜在的巨大影响。因此,作者认为研究和开发情感工程维度是当务之急。因此,受神经科学新见解的启发,我们呼吁通过提出一个新的假设来重新考虑现代工程的理性和有意识的决策基础:工程决策本身是非理性的和/或无意识的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信