Exploring Lexical Errors of Indonesian EFL Students in Writing Recount Texts

M. Fakhrudin, Dzulfikri Dzulfikri, Mutmainah Mustofa
{"title":"Exploring Lexical Errors of Indonesian EFL Students in Writing Recount Texts","authors":"M. Fakhrudin, Dzulfikri Dzulfikri, Mutmainah Mustofa","doi":"10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to examine the EFL students’ lexical errors in writing recount texts. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method involving 31 students and uses the taxonomy of James’ lexical errors in analyzing the texts. The findings revealed that there was a total of 161 lexical errors in the students’ recount writings. Likewise, it was claimed that misselection became the most frequent lexical error, with 73 errors. The next was suffix type with 35 errors and calque with 10 errors. Furthermore, the results showed that most students felt difficult to select the appropriate lexical types in writing recount texts and most of the formal errors resulted from the intralingual error. Thus, the study recommends that the teachers teach vocabulary in contexts rather than words and use English thesaurus or monolingual dictionaries to find the grammatical content, definitions, examples, spelling, or other structures. The study also recommends online lexical analyzers, drillling, and remedy as the other alternative methods of reducing lexical errors in writing.","PeriodicalId":223469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics","volume":"2 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to examine the EFL students’ lexical errors in writing recount texts. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method involving 31 students and uses the taxonomy of James’ lexical errors in analyzing the texts. The findings revealed that there was a total of 161 lexical errors in the students’ recount writings. Likewise, it was claimed that misselection became the most frequent lexical error, with 73 errors. The next was suffix type with 35 errors and calque with 10 errors. Furthermore, the results showed that most students felt difficult to select the appropriate lexical types in writing recount texts and most of the formal errors resulted from the intralingual error. Thus, the study recommends that the teachers teach vocabulary in contexts rather than words and use English thesaurus or monolingual dictionaries to find the grammatical content, definitions, examples, spelling, or other structures. The study also recommends online lexical analyzers, drillling, and remedy as the other alternative methods of reducing lexical errors in writing.
印尼语学生复述语篇写作中的词汇错误探析
本研究旨在探讨英语学生在复述文本写作中的词汇错误。本研究采用描述性定性方法,对31名学生进行研究,采用詹姆斯词汇错误分类法对文本进行分析。研究结果显示,在学生们的叙述文章中,共有161个词汇错误。同样,错误选择成为最常见的词汇错误,有73个错误。其次是后缀型,有35个错误,calque有10个错误。此外,研究结果还表明,大多数学生在撰写重述文本时感到难以选择合适的词汇类型,并且大多数形式错误是由语内错误造成的。因此,该研究建议教师在语境中而不是在单词中教授词汇,并使用英语同义词典或单语词典来查找语法内容、定义、示例、拼写或其他结构。该研究还建议使用在线词汇分析、操练和补救等方法来减少写作中的词汇错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信