The Impact of Legislation on the Outcomes of Civil Litigation: An Empirical Analysis of the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012

P. Fenn, N. Rickman
{"title":"The Impact of Legislation on the Outcomes of Civil Litigation: An Empirical Analysis of the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012","authors":"P. Fenn, N. Rickman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3326665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) came into force in England and Wales in 2013, Part 2 of which brought a number of reforms to the costs and conduct of civil litigation. The current paper seeks to provide the first empirical evaluation of LASPO Part 2. We begin by discussing and presenting the types of data that are required for the evaluation given the difficulties caused by the changing mix of pre- and post-LASPO rules applying to settled claims. We then present graphical and regression analysis to show that LASPO appears to have had a statistically significant effect on settlement behaviour and on the overall costs of litigation, at least in relation to the types of claim and data sources considered here. There are fewer claims, and their recovered base costs, damages and use of formal legal proceedings have all diminished. In our conclusion we put these results in context of the declared objectives of the reforms, speculate on what may have caused the behavioural shifts we observe, and comment on ways to develop the research.","PeriodicalId":113747,"journal":{"name":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","volume":"47 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3326665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) came into force in England and Wales in 2013, Part 2 of which brought a number of reforms to the costs and conduct of civil litigation. The current paper seeks to provide the first empirical evaluation of LASPO Part 2. We begin by discussing and presenting the types of data that are required for the evaluation given the difficulties caused by the changing mix of pre- and post-LASPO rules applying to settled claims. We then present graphical and regression analysis to show that LASPO appears to have had a statistically significant effect on settlement behaviour and on the overall costs of litigation, at least in relation to the types of claim and data sources considered here. There are fewer claims, and their recovered base costs, damages and use of formal legal proceedings have all diminished. In our conclusion we put these results in context of the declared objectives of the reforms, speculate on what may have caused the behavioural shifts we observe, and comment on ways to develop the research.
立法对民事诉讼结果的影响——基于2012年《法律援助罪犯量刑法》的实证分析
2013年,《法律援助罪犯量刑法》(LASPO)在英格兰和威尔士生效,其中第二部分对民事诉讼的费用和行为进行了一些改革。本文试图提供LASPO第2部分的第一个实证评价。我们首先讨论和介绍评估所需的数据类型,因为适用于已解决索赔的拉斯派和支助办之前和之后的规则不断变化所造成的困难。然后,我们提出图形和回归分析,显示LASPO似乎对和解行为和诉讼总成本有统计上显著的影响,至少在这里考虑的索赔类型和数据来源方面是如此。索赔减少了,其收回的基本费用、损害赔偿和使用正式法律程序都减少了。在我们的结论中,我们把这些结果放在改革的既定目标的背景下,推测是什么导致了我们观察到的行为转变,并评论了发展研究的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信