From Gevgelija to Budapest: The bare life in transit camps of the Balkans and Eastern Europe

G. Forino
{"title":"From Gevgelija to Budapest: The bare life in transit camps of the Balkans and Eastern Europe","authors":"G. Forino","doi":"10.1080/21931674.2016.1186420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the end of August 2015, the refugee crisis was mounting across the whole European Union, and particularly in the Balkans and Eastern Europe. Things were becoming heated, not only in terms of high temperatures, but also in terms of tension and debate within the European Union about how to manage what was, and still is, rightly considered a humanitarian crisis (Forino, 2015). Refugees from the Middle East, mainly – but not limited to – fleeing from conflict areas of Sub-Saharan Africa, Syria, and Iraq, were trying to enter the European Union area via Turkey and Greece, towards aspired destinations in Northern Europe. In the Balkan area and Eastern Europe, refugees were contained in organized or spontaneous transit camps close to national borders or in the main railway stations of cities. In those camps, ignominious conditions of depersonalization and deprivation of human rights and primary needs took place for thousands of people. Those lives and those bodies, in those conditions, were a classic example of the “bare life” as theorized by the Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben (2005). The bare life of refugees results from a neoliberal governance of the European Union and member states, using the state of exception as a core instrument of national sovereignty, and dividing people – and related rights – who have a recognized citizenship under a legal system from those who do not (Agamben, 2005). This life becomes stripped of any political and legal significance and protection, banished from collectivity, and perpetually exposed to violation and deprivation (Ziarek, 2012). During that time, I was traveling on my own, and had neither volunteerism or research purposes, nor was I working for non-governmental organizations or international institutions. Therefore, this report is simply based on a personal and subjective experience (see also Forino, 2015). The report presents a very brief description of the life conditions and the surrounding environments of the transit camps, in the following order: Gevgelija (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, FYROM), on the FYROM-Greece border; the Central Station in Belgrade, the capital of Serbia; Kanjiža (Serbia), on the Serbia-Hungary border; and the Keleti Station in Budapest, the capital of Hungary. Camps were visited between 28 August","PeriodicalId":413830,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Social Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Social Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2016.1186420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the end of August 2015, the refugee crisis was mounting across the whole European Union, and particularly in the Balkans and Eastern Europe. Things were becoming heated, not only in terms of high temperatures, but also in terms of tension and debate within the European Union about how to manage what was, and still is, rightly considered a humanitarian crisis (Forino, 2015). Refugees from the Middle East, mainly – but not limited to – fleeing from conflict areas of Sub-Saharan Africa, Syria, and Iraq, were trying to enter the European Union area via Turkey and Greece, towards aspired destinations in Northern Europe. In the Balkan area and Eastern Europe, refugees were contained in organized or spontaneous transit camps close to national borders or in the main railway stations of cities. In those camps, ignominious conditions of depersonalization and deprivation of human rights and primary needs took place for thousands of people. Those lives and those bodies, in those conditions, were a classic example of the “bare life” as theorized by the Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben (2005). The bare life of refugees results from a neoliberal governance of the European Union and member states, using the state of exception as a core instrument of national sovereignty, and dividing people – and related rights – who have a recognized citizenship under a legal system from those who do not (Agamben, 2005). This life becomes stripped of any political and legal significance and protection, banished from collectivity, and perpetually exposed to violation and deprivation (Ziarek, 2012). During that time, I was traveling on my own, and had neither volunteerism or research purposes, nor was I working for non-governmental organizations or international institutions. Therefore, this report is simply based on a personal and subjective experience (see also Forino, 2015). The report presents a very brief description of the life conditions and the surrounding environments of the transit camps, in the following order: Gevgelija (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, FYROM), on the FYROM-Greece border; the Central Station in Belgrade, the capital of Serbia; Kanjiža (Serbia), on the Serbia-Hungary border; and the Keleti Station in Budapest, the capital of Hungary. Camps were visited between 28 August
从格夫盖利亚到布达佩斯:巴尔干半岛和东欧的过渡难民营的生活
2015年8月底,难民危机席卷整个欧盟,尤其是巴尔干半岛和东欧。事情变得越来越激烈,不仅在高温方面,而且在欧盟内部关于如何管理过去和现在正确地认为是人道主义危机的紧张和辩论方面(Forino, 2015)。来自中东的难民,主要是(但不限于)逃离撒哈拉以南非洲、叙利亚和伊拉克的冲突地区,试图通过土耳其和希腊进入欧盟地区,前往北欧的理想目的地。在巴尔干地区和东欧,难民被收容在靠近国家边界的有组织或自发的临时难民营或城市的主要火车站。在这些难民营中,成千上万的人在不光彩的条件下丧失人格,被剥夺人权和基本需要。这些生命和身体,在这些条件下,是意大利哲学家Giorgio Agamben(2005)提出的“赤裸生命”理论的经典例子。难民的赤裸裸生活源于欧盟及其成员国的新自由主义治理,将例外状态作为国家主权的核心工具,并将在法律体系下拥有公认公民身份的人与不拥有公民身份的人分开,以及相关权利(Agamben, 2005)。这种生活被剥夺了任何政治和法律意义和保护,被驱逐出集体,并永远暴露于侵犯和剥夺(Ziarek, 2012)。那段时间,我独自旅行,既没有志愿服务,也没有研究目的,也没有为非政府组织或国际机构工作。因此,这份报告只是基于个人和主观的经验(参见Forino, 2015)。该报告非常简要地介绍了过境难民营的生活条件和周围环境,顺序如下:格夫盖利亚(前南斯拉夫马其顿共和国),位于前南斯拉夫马其顿共和国-希腊边界;塞尔维亚首都贝尔格莱德的中央车站;Kanjiža(塞尔维亚),位于塞尔维亚-匈牙利边界;以及匈牙利首都布达佩斯的凯莱蒂车站。8月28日期间访问了难民营
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信