Differences in reverberation chamber insertion loss measurement in time & frequency domian

Hong Lei, S. Bowen, Zhou Zhongyuan, Zhou Xiang
{"title":"Differences in reverberation chamber insertion loss measurement in time & frequency domian","authors":"Hong Lei, S. Bowen, Zhou Zhongyuan, Zhou Xiang","doi":"10.1109/CEEM.2015.7368651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differences in the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber as measured in frequency & time domain are shown. And an alternative approach for measuring the insertion loss which is named as time domain energy-decay method is proposed, and compared with conventional time domain time-decay method & frequency domain continuous wave based method. Insertion loss measured by time domain energy-decay method is identical to that which would be obtained in frequency domain. The insertion loss determined by time-decay method is 1~2dB greater than those obtained with frequency domain measurement, the main reason for the discrepancy is the influence of antenna (antenna impedance mismatch and non-unit antenna efficiency). The effectiveness of the time domain method for measuring the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber is of particular interest in this paper.","PeriodicalId":442379,"journal":{"name":"2015 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Environmental Electromagnetics (CEEM)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Environmental Electromagnetics (CEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEEM.2015.7368651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differences in the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber as measured in frequency & time domain are shown. And an alternative approach for measuring the insertion loss which is named as time domain energy-decay method is proposed, and compared with conventional time domain time-decay method & frequency domain continuous wave based method. Insertion loss measured by time domain energy-decay method is identical to that which would be obtained in frequency domain. The insertion loss determined by time-decay method is 1~2dB greater than those obtained with frequency domain measurement, the main reason for the discrepancy is the influence of antenna (antenna impedance mismatch and non-unit antenna efficiency). The effectiveness of the time domain method for measuring the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber is of particular interest in this paper.
混响室插入损耗测量的时频差异
显示了混响室在频域和时域测量的插入损耗的差异。提出了一种测量插入损耗的替代方法——时域能量衰减法,并与传统的时域时间衰减法和基于频域连续波的方法进行了比较。用时域能量衰减法测得的插入损耗与在频域测得的插入损耗相同。时间衰减法测得的插入损耗比频域测量法测得的插入损耗大1~2dB,产生差异的主要原因是天线的影响(天线阻抗失配和非单元天线效率)。时域法测量混响室插入损耗的有效性是本文特别关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信