Risk hedging in storage grid markets: Do options add value to forwards?

Anna Ye Du, Sanjukta Das, R. Gopal, R. Ramesh
{"title":"Risk hedging in storage grid markets: Do options add value to forwards?","authors":"Anna Ye Du, Sanjukta Das, R. Gopal, R. Ramesh","doi":"10.1145/1985347.1985351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet storage services allow businesses to move away from maintaining their own internal storage networks. Service providers currently follow a utility pricing model which translates to them absorbing all the risk that arises from the fluctuating storage needs of their customers. The risk borne by the Internet storage service providers has large revenue implications as Internet startups and smaller companies, which face significant demand stochasticity, constitute an important segment of their clientele. We develop an option pricing mechanism to hedge against this risk and evaluate its effectiveness vis-à-vis forward contracts. We obtain the conditions under which options dominate forward contracts and the trade-offs involved when the provider has to decide on appropriate pricing mechanisms. Our empirical study uses publicly obtainable traffic data of Amazon S3 clients to validate the analytical results. We show that providers can significantly benefit from including options in their risk-hedging portfolio, especially when there is less variation in the costs faced by the buyers in building their own data networks as opposed to using cloud services.","PeriodicalId":178565,"journal":{"name":"ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst.","volume":"148 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Internet storage services allow businesses to move away from maintaining their own internal storage networks. Service providers currently follow a utility pricing model which translates to them absorbing all the risk that arises from the fluctuating storage needs of their customers. The risk borne by the Internet storage service providers has large revenue implications as Internet startups and smaller companies, which face significant demand stochasticity, constitute an important segment of their clientele. We develop an option pricing mechanism to hedge against this risk and evaluate its effectiveness vis-à-vis forward contracts. We obtain the conditions under which options dominate forward contracts and the trade-offs involved when the provider has to decide on appropriate pricing mechanisms. Our empirical study uses publicly obtainable traffic data of Amazon S3 clients to validate the analytical results. We show that providers can significantly benefit from including options in their risk-hedging portfolio, especially when there is less variation in the costs faced by the buyers in building their own data networks as opposed to using cloud services.
储能电网市场的风险对冲:期权能为远期交易增加价值吗?
互联网存储服务允许企业不再维护自己的内部存储网络。服务提供商目前遵循公用事业定价模式,这意味着他们承担了客户存储需求波动带来的所有风险。互联网存储服务提供商承担的风险对收入有很大影响,因为互联网初创企业和较小的公司是其客户的重要组成部分,它们面临着显著的需求随机性。我们开发了一种期权定价机制来对冲这种风险,并评估其对-à-vis远期合约的有效性。我们得到了期权在远期合约中占主导地位的条件,以及供应商必须决定适当定价机制时所涉及的权衡。我们的实证研究使用公开可获得的Amazon S3客户端的流量数据来验证分析结果。我们表明,供应商可以从在其风险对冲组合中包含期权中显著获益,特别是当买方在构建自己的数据网络时所面临的成本变化较小,而不是使用云服务时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信