Study on Consumer Perception towards Quality of Spices Powder Available in Bangladesh

S. Sattar, P. Das, Sajjad Hossain, K. Sarower, M. Uddin
{"title":"Study on Consumer Perception towards Quality of Spices Powder Available in Bangladesh","authors":"S. Sattar, P. Das, Sajjad Hossain, K. Sarower, M. Uddin","doi":"10.4236/ojsst.2019.94009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This was a survey-based \nstudy and conducted to analyze the findings of questionnaires about the \nconsumer opinion towards the quality of few selected spices powder (turmeric, \ncoriander, chili, cumin and mixed spices) available in Bangladesh, the health \neffect of low-quality \nspices powder and the preventive measures as well. From the survey, it was \nfound that on average 90.70% people believed that the spices powders are not of \ngood quality. Study on the types of adulterants added in the spices powder \naccording to consumers’ suspect \nrevealed that addition of low-grade raw spice with high grade was at the top \nposition which was followed by brick dust and sand. Based \non consumers’ opinion, cancer, chronic nephritis and high blood pressure were \nthe top possible diseases which may associate due to \nconsumption of adulterated spices powder. Implication of Bangladesh Standards \nand Testing Institution (BSTI) standards, enforcing law and imposing punishment \nand social motivation of food consumers could be the best preventive measures \naccording to the people’s opinion. Finally, this \nstudy revealed that the people suspect that the quality of spices powder in \nBangladesh is not up to the mark and expect necessary actions against \nadulteration if found in spices powder.","PeriodicalId":183634,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojsst.2019.94009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This was a survey-based study and conducted to analyze the findings of questionnaires about the consumer opinion towards the quality of few selected spices powder (turmeric, coriander, chili, cumin and mixed spices) available in Bangladesh, the health effect of low-quality spices powder and the preventive measures as well. From the survey, it was found that on average 90.70% people believed that the spices powders are not of good quality. Study on the types of adulterants added in the spices powder according to consumers’ suspect revealed that addition of low-grade raw spice with high grade was at the top position which was followed by brick dust and sand. Based on consumers’ opinion, cancer, chronic nephritis and high blood pressure were the top possible diseases which may associate due to consumption of adulterated spices powder. Implication of Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution (BSTI) standards, enforcing law and imposing punishment and social motivation of food consumers could be the best preventive measures according to the people’s opinion. Finally, this study revealed that the people suspect that the quality of spices powder in Bangladesh is not up to the mark and expect necessary actions against adulteration if found in spices powder.
孟加拉国消费者对香料粉质量认知的研究
这是一项基于调查的研究,旨在分析消费者对孟加拉国几种精选香料粉(姜黄、香菜、辣椒、孜然和混合香料)的质量意见的问卷调查结果,以及低质量香料粉对健康的影响和预防措施。从调查中发现,平均有90.70%的人认为香料粉质量不好。根据消费者的怀疑程度对香辛粉中掺假种类进行了研究,结果显示,高品位低品位原料香料掺假最多,其次是砖粉和砂子。根据消费者的意见,癌症、慢性肾炎和高血压是食用掺假香料粉可能导致的最严重疾病。孟加拉国标准和检测机构(BSTI)标准的含义,执法和惩罚以及食品消费者的社会动机可能是人们认为最好的预防措施。最后,这项研究表明,人们怀疑孟加拉国的香料粉质量不合格,如果发现香料粉中掺假,预计会采取必要的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信