Should Human Rights Practice be Rights Based?

Sarah Knuckey, Margaret L. Satterthwaite
{"title":"Should Human Rights Practice be Rights Based?","authors":"Sarah Knuckey, Margaret L. Satterthwaite","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868064.003.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human rights scholars and organizations often call on governments to adopt ‘human rights-based approaches’ (HRBAs) to many policy areas, from climate change to health policy. HRBAs identify rights and obligations, and advance the principles of participation, accountability, equality, and non-discrimination. This chapter argues that HRBAs have been exported to many fields without ever being sufficiently integrated within human rights advocacy. We find that NGOs often fail to adhere to foundational human rights principles in their own work, reproducing unjust power hierarchies, objectifying victims, and disempowering rights-holders. Were HRBAs adopted by more human rights organizations, the face of human rights advocacy would change—often dramatically. We conclude with questions that could guide human rights practitioners and scholars to advance reform.","PeriodicalId":233746,"journal":{"name":"The Struggle for Human Rights","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Struggle for Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868064.003.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human rights scholars and organizations often call on governments to adopt ‘human rights-based approaches’ (HRBAs) to many policy areas, from climate change to health policy. HRBAs identify rights and obligations, and advance the principles of participation, accountability, equality, and non-discrimination. This chapter argues that HRBAs have been exported to many fields without ever being sufficiently integrated within human rights advocacy. We find that NGOs often fail to adhere to foundational human rights principles in their own work, reproducing unjust power hierarchies, objectifying victims, and disempowering rights-holders. Were HRBAs adopted by more human rights organizations, the face of human rights advocacy would change—often dramatically. We conclude with questions that could guide human rights practitioners and scholars to advance reform.
人权实践应该以权利为基础吗?
人权学者和组织经常呼吁各国政府在从气候变化到卫生政策等许多政策领域采用"基于人权的方法"。HRBAs明确权利和义务,推进参与、问责、平等和非歧视的原则。本章认为,人权机构已被输出到许多领域,但从未充分纳入人权倡导。我们发现,非政府组织在自己的工作中往往不能坚持基本的人权原则,再现不公正的权力等级制度,将受害者客观化,剥夺权利持有人的权力。如果hrba被更多的人权组织采用,人权倡导的面貌将会发生巨大的变化。最后,我们提出了一些可以指导人权从业者和学者推进改革的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书