Automatic detection of nocuous coordination ambiguities in natural language requirements

Hui Yang, A. Willis, A. Roeck, B. Nuseibeh
{"title":"Automatic detection of nocuous coordination ambiguities in natural language requirements","authors":"Hui Yang, A. Willis, A. Roeck, B. Nuseibeh","doi":"10.1145/1858996.1859007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural language is prevalent in requirements documents. However, ambiguity is an intrinsic phenomenon of natural language, and is therefore present in all such documents. Ambiguity occurs when a sentence can be interpreted differently by different readers. In this paper, we describe an automated approach for characterizing and detecting so-called nocuous ambiguities, which carry a high risk of misunderstanding among different readers. Given a natural language requirements document, sentences that contain specific types of ambiguity are first extracted automatically from the text. A machine learning algorithm is then used to determine whether an ambiguous sentence is nocuous or innocuous, based on a set of heuristics that draw on human judgments, which we collected as training data. We implemented a prototype tool for Nocuous Ambiguity Identification (NAI), in order to illustrate and evaluate our approach. The tool focuses on coordination ambiguity. We report on the results of a set of experiments to assess the performance and usefulness of the approach.","PeriodicalId":341489,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1858996.1859007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

Natural language is prevalent in requirements documents. However, ambiguity is an intrinsic phenomenon of natural language, and is therefore present in all such documents. Ambiguity occurs when a sentence can be interpreted differently by different readers. In this paper, we describe an automated approach for characterizing and detecting so-called nocuous ambiguities, which carry a high risk of misunderstanding among different readers. Given a natural language requirements document, sentences that contain specific types of ambiguity are first extracted automatically from the text. A machine learning algorithm is then used to determine whether an ambiguous sentence is nocuous or innocuous, based on a set of heuristics that draw on human judgments, which we collected as training data. We implemented a prototype tool for Nocuous Ambiguity Identification (NAI), in order to illustrate and evaluate our approach. The tool focuses on coordination ambiguity. We report on the results of a set of experiments to assess the performance and usefulness of the approach.
自然语言需求中有害协调歧义的自动检测
自然语言在需求文档中很流行。然而,歧义是自然语言的固有现象,因此在所有此类文件中都存在。歧义是指不同的读者对同一个句子的理解不同。在本文中,我们描述了一种自动化的方法来表征和检测所谓的有害歧义,这种歧义在不同的读者之间具有很高的误解风险。给定一个自然语言需求文档,首先从文本中自动提取包含特定类型歧义的句子。然后使用机器学习算法来确定歧义句子是有害的还是无害的,这是基于我们收集作为训练数据的人类判断的一组启发式。为了说明和评估我们的方法,我们实现了一个用于无害歧义识别(NAI)的原型工具。该工具侧重于协调歧义。我们报告了一组实验的结果,以评估该方法的性能和有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信