Personal Exposure to Air Pollution for Various Modes of Transport in Auckland, New Zealand

K. Dirks, P. Sharma, J. Salmond, S. Costello
{"title":"Personal Exposure to Air Pollution for Various Modes of Transport in Auckland, New Zealand","authors":"K. Dirks, P. Sharma, J. Salmond, S. Costello","doi":"10.2174/1874282301206010084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the carbon monoxide (CO) doses received while commuting by different modes (car, bus, train, motorcycle, bicycle and running), taking into account the commute time as well as the level of physical activity required. While the participants were constrained to travel at specific peak traffic times and between designated start and end points, they were free to choose a route appropriate for their mode of transport. The results of this study suggest that the lowest exposures (concentrations of pollutants) are experienced by train commuters, largely a reflection of the routes being removed from any significant road traffic. Motorcyclists experienced significantly higher average concentrations as a result of high-concentration and very-short-duration peaks not seen in the traces of car and bus commuters travelling on the same road. Travel by bus along a dedicated busway was also found to be effective in reducing commuter air pollution exposure compared to travel by car on a congested stretch of motorway. The average concentrations to which cyclists and runners were exposed were found to be not significantly different for those travelling by car or bus (except when on dedicated pedestrian/cycleways). However, when the increased physical activity that is required is taken into account (leading to higher volumes of air breathed) along with the increased commuting time (especially in the case of runners), the air pollution doses (as estimated by the product of the concentration, commute time and breathing factor) were found to be significantly higher than for the motorised modes. The results suggest that separate pedestrian/cycleways go some way towards providing healthier options for cyclists and pedestrians.","PeriodicalId":122982,"journal":{"name":"The Open Atmospheric Science Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Atmospheric Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874282301206010084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

This paper investigates the carbon monoxide (CO) doses received while commuting by different modes (car, bus, train, motorcycle, bicycle and running), taking into account the commute time as well as the level of physical activity required. While the participants were constrained to travel at specific peak traffic times and between designated start and end points, they were free to choose a route appropriate for their mode of transport. The results of this study suggest that the lowest exposures (concentrations of pollutants) are experienced by train commuters, largely a reflection of the routes being removed from any significant road traffic. Motorcyclists experienced significantly higher average concentrations as a result of high-concentration and very-short-duration peaks not seen in the traces of car and bus commuters travelling on the same road. Travel by bus along a dedicated busway was also found to be effective in reducing commuter air pollution exposure compared to travel by car on a congested stretch of motorway. The average concentrations to which cyclists and runners were exposed were found to be not significantly different for those travelling by car or bus (except when on dedicated pedestrian/cycleways). However, when the increased physical activity that is required is taken into account (leading to higher volumes of air breathed) along with the increased commuting time (especially in the case of runners), the air pollution doses (as estimated by the product of the concentration, commute time and breathing factor) were found to be significantly higher than for the motorised modes. The results suggest that separate pedestrian/cycleways go some way towards providing healthier options for cyclists and pedestrians.
新西兰奥克兰不同交通方式的个人空气污染暴露情况
考虑到通勤时间和所需的体力活动水平,本文调查了不同交通方式(汽车、公共汽车、火车、摩托车、自行车和跑步)通勤时所接受的一氧化碳(CO)剂量。虽然参与者被限制在特定的交通高峰时间和指定的起点和终点之间旅行,但他们可以自由选择适合其运输方式的路线。这项研究的结果表明,最低的暴露(污染物浓度)是由火车通勤者经历的,这在很大程度上反映了从任何重要的道路交通中移除的路线。摩托车手的平均浓度明显更高,因为在同一条路上行驶的汽车和公共汽车通勤者的足迹中,高浓度和极短时间的峰值是看不到的。研究还发现,与在拥挤的高速公路上开车相比,在专用公交道上乘坐公交车能有效减少通勤者接触到的空气污染。骑自行车者和跑步者接触的平均浓度与乘坐汽车或公共汽车的人没有显著差异(在专用的行人/自行车道上除外)。然而,当考虑到所需的体力活动增加(导致呼吸的空气量增加)以及通勤时间的增加(特别是在跑步者的情况下)时,发现空气污染剂量(通过浓度,通勤时间和呼吸因素的乘积估计)明显高于机动模式。结果表明,单独的行人/自行车道在某种程度上为骑自行车的人和行人提供了更健康的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信