Contrapower Harassment in Paramedicine: Experiences of Academic Staff in Australian Universities

B. Williams, Christine King, M. Boyle, Lisa Clegg, S. Devenish, Catherine Kamphuis, James King, David Reid
{"title":"Contrapower Harassment in Paramedicine: Experiences of Academic Staff in Australian Universities","authors":"B. Williams, Christine King, M. Boyle, Lisa Clegg, S. Devenish, Catherine Kamphuis, James King, David Reid","doi":"10.33151/ajp.19.1006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Although bullying and harassment among academic staff has been well researched, research on students bullying and harassing academic teaching staff (ie, contrapower harassment) is less common. Contrapower harassment has been on the rise in academia over the last decade, partly attributable to changes in the student-faculty staff relationship. This study aimed to understand better the extent and impact of students’ contrapower harassment on paramedic academic teaching staff within Australian universities, as well as actions and interventions to address it. Methods This study used a two-phase mixed methods design. In phase 1, a convenience sample of paramedic teaching academics from 12 universities in Australia participated in an online questionnaire. In phase 2, an in-depth interview was conducted with nine participants from phase 1. Results Seventy-six academic teaching staff participated in the study. Survey results showed that most academics surveyed had experienced harassment from paramedic students, with the highest incidence of harassment occurring during student assessment periods. Alarmingly, over 30% of the academics surveyed had been ‘stalked’ by a student and over 50% had felt powerless and helpless when students had attacked them on social media. Problematic students were identified as those who presented with an over-inflated sense of entitlement or with psychological states and traits that find it challenging to accept feedback and failure, and look to externalise their failures. Reasons for increases in contrapower harassment included a complex mix of consumer and demand-driven education, on-demand (and demanding) instant gratification and degree self-entitlement, and an increase in social media and online learning (particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020). Conclusion Although most of the academics in this study experienced contrapower harassment by students, they also report that most students are level-headed and supportive, and do not carry out this type of harassment. Promoting student professionalism and reassessing student evaluations are starting points for addressing this type of harassment. Further research on the broader systemic issues that influence the contributors to contrapower harassment is needed.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"19 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.19.1006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Although bullying and harassment among academic staff has been well researched, research on students bullying and harassing academic teaching staff (ie, contrapower harassment) is less common. Contrapower harassment has been on the rise in academia over the last decade, partly attributable to changes in the student-faculty staff relationship. This study aimed to understand better the extent and impact of students’ contrapower harassment on paramedic academic teaching staff within Australian universities, as well as actions and interventions to address it. Methods This study used a two-phase mixed methods design. In phase 1, a convenience sample of paramedic teaching academics from 12 universities in Australia participated in an online questionnaire. In phase 2, an in-depth interview was conducted with nine participants from phase 1. Results Seventy-six academic teaching staff participated in the study. Survey results showed that most academics surveyed had experienced harassment from paramedic students, with the highest incidence of harassment occurring during student assessment periods. Alarmingly, over 30% of the academics surveyed had been ‘stalked’ by a student and over 50% had felt powerless and helpless when students had attacked them on social media. Problematic students were identified as those who presented with an over-inflated sense of entitlement or with psychological states and traits that find it challenging to accept feedback and failure, and look to externalise their failures. Reasons for increases in contrapower harassment included a complex mix of consumer and demand-driven education, on-demand (and demanding) instant gratification and degree self-entitlement, and an increase in social media and online learning (particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020). Conclusion Although most of the academics in this study experienced contrapower harassment by students, they also report that most students are level-headed and supportive, and do not carry out this type of harassment. Promoting student professionalism and reassessing student evaluations are starting points for addressing this type of harassment. Further research on the broader systemic issues that influence the contributors to contrapower harassment is needed.
辅助医学中的反权力骚扰:澳大利亚大学学术人员的经验
虽然学术人员中的欺凌和骚扰已经得到了很好的研究,但关于学生欺凌和骚扰学术教学人员(即反权力骚扰)的研究并不常见。在过去的十年里,对权力的骚扰在学术界呈上升趋势,部分原因是师生关系的变化。本研究旨在更好地了解学生对澳大利亚大学护理学术教学人员的反权力骚扰的程度和影响,以及解决这一问题的行动和干预措施。方法采用两期混合法设计。在第一阶段,来自澳大利亚12所大学的护理教学学者参与了一份在线问卷调查。在第二阶段,对来自第一阶段的9名参与者进行了深度访谈。结果76名教学人员参与了本研究。调查结果显示,大多数接受调查的学者都经历过来自护理学生的骚扰,骚扰发生率最高的是在学生评估期间。令人担忧的是,超过30%的受访学者曾被学生“跟踪”,超过50%的人在学生在社交媒体上攻击他们时感到无能为力和无助。问题学生被认为是那些表现出过度膨胀的权利意识,或者具有难以接受反馈和失败的心理状态和特征,并希望将他们的失败外部化的学生。反权力骚扰增加的原因包括消费者和需求驱动的教育、按需(和苛刻的)即时满足和学位自我权利的复杂组合,以及社交媒体和在线学习的增加(特别是在2020年COVID-19大流行期间)。虽然本研究中的大多数学者都经历过学生的反权力骚扰,但他们也报告说大多数学生都是冷静和支持的,并且不会进行这种类型的骚扰。提高学生的专业素养和重新评估学生的评价是解决这类骚扰的出发点。需要对影响反权力骚扰的贡献者的更广泛的系统性问题进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信