Risk assessment and identification of accident points at a highway construction site and drawing Safety Contour Maps (Southeastern Iran, 2019)

Hossein ElahiShirvan, S. Zare, Edris Gharanjik, A. Matin, M. Bateni, Davood Hasanvand, M. R. G. Ravandi
{"title":"Risk assessment and identification of accident points at a highway construction site and drawing Safety Contour Maps (Southeastern Iran, 2019)","authors":"Hossein ElahiShirvan, S. Zare, Edris Gharanjik, A. Matin, M. Bateni, Davood Hasanvand, M. R. G. Ravandi","doi":"10.29252/JOHE.8.3.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article Info Background:The number of occupational safety incidents has been a major concern in terms of human, economic, and legal considerations. Risk assessment is a logical method for the assessment of risks, which specifies risks and their potential implications for individuals, materials, equipment, and the environment. This study aims to identify both risks and risk assessment methods at a highway construction site using the FMEA method and by drawing safety contour maps, making use of ArcGIS 10.2. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in 9 general steps, including 1. Reviewing demographic data, 2. Identifying human risks, 3. Identifying risk causes, 4. Identifying risk effects, 5. Determining the severity and occurrence of risks, 6. Rating risks, 7. Controlling risks, 8. Entering the coordinates and RPNs of occupations for each location in ArcGIS, and 9. Drawing safety contour maps using ArcGIS 10.2. The mean and standard deviation of the data were reported using SPSS Statistics V 22.0. Results: At the site of this study, 62.97% of the units had moderate risks, and the rest had low risks (37.03%). The highest RPNs were for light machines and asphalt rollers with the values of 42.91 and 41.3, respectively. In contrast, the lowest RPNs were obtained for the laboratory and the water supply plant. Conclusions: Most of the site units had moderate risks, so it is expected that the risk of the units would be minimized by implementing the recommendations.","PeriodicalId":140710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/JOHE.8.3.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article Info Background:The number of occupational safety incidents has been a major concern in terms of human, economic, and legal considerations. Risk assessment is a logical method for the assessment of risks, which specifies risks and their potential implications for individuals, materials, equipment, and the environment. This study aims to identify both risks and risk assessment methods at a highway construction site using the FMEA method and by drawing safety contour maps, making use of ArcGIS 10.2. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in 9 general steps, including 1. Reviewing demographic data, 2. Identifying human risks, 3. Identifying risk causes, 4. Identifying risk effects, 5. Determining the severity and occurrence of risks, 6. Rating risks, 7. Controlling risks, 8. Entering the coordinates and RPNs of occupations for each location in ArcGIS, and 9. Drawing safety contour maps using ArcGIS 10.2. The mean and standard deviation of the data were reported using SPSS Statistics V 22.0. Results: At the site of this study, 62.97% of the units had moderate risks, and the rest had low risks (37.03%). The highest RPNs were for light machines and asphalt rollers with the values of 42.91 and 41.3, respectively. In contrast, the lowest RPNs were obtained for the laboratory and the water supply plant. Conclusions: Most of the site units had moderate risks, so it is expected that the risk of the units would be minimized by implementing the recommendations.
某公路施工现场事故点风险评估识别及安全等高线地图绘制(伊朗东南部,2019)
文章信息背景:职业安全事故的数量在人力、经济和法律方面一直是一个主要问题。风险评估是一种评估风险的逻辑方法,它规定了风险及其对个人、材料、设备和环境的潜在影响。本研究利用ArcGIS 10.2软件,采用FMEA方法,绘制安全等高线图,对某公路施工现场进行风险识别和风险评估方法。材料与方法:本研究共分为9个一般步骤,其中1。回顾人口统计数据;2 .识别人类风险;识别风险原因;识别风险影响;确定风险的严重性和发生;评级风险,7分。8.控制风险;9.在ArcGIS中输入每个位置的职业坐标和rpn;利用ArcGIS 10.2绘制安全等高线图。数据的均值和标准差采用SPSS Statistics V 22.0报告。结果:在本研究现场,62.97%的单位为中度风险,其余单位为低风险(37.03%)。轻型机械和沥青压路机的RPNs最高,分别为42.91和41.3。相比之下,实验室和供水厂的rpn最低。结论:大多数现场单位具有中等风险,因此预计通过实施建议可以将这些单位的风险降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信