Virtual RDE: Ensuring RDE conformity of hybridized powertrains in the early stage of the development process

M. Grill, Mahir-Tim Keskin, M. Bargende
{"title":"Virtual RDE: Ensuring RDE conformity of hybridized powertrains in the early stage of the development process","authors":"M. Grill, Mahir-Tim Keskin, M. Bargende","doi":"10.51202/9783181023730-i-343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the introduction of \"Real Driving Emissions\" (RDE) powertrain simulation has become indispensable to identify critical operating conditions for the exhaust aftertreatment system at an early stage in the development process and to analyze possible corrective actions. Therefore a rudimentary virtual RDE calibration is also necessary in the early concept phase. For doing so, it makes a lot of sense to use 1D flow simulation to model effects such as boost pressure built-up, high/low pressure EGR travel times or thermal inertia. There are two challenges regarding 1D simulation of RDE:  Combustion system development is usually done at single cylinder engines. It is necessary to integrate the results of the single cylinder engine in an effective way into a virtual full engine for RDE investigations and first virtual calibration  Moreover, it is typically necessary to investigate a vast number of RDE driving patterns, taking up much more computational time than it was the case previously with a single type-approval driving cycle. Consequently, \"Fast Running Models\" (FRM) that reduce the computational effort needed for flow simulation have been used to counteract this increase. However, it is inevitable that such an approach reduces the accuracy of the boundary conditions at intake valve closing (IVC), e.g. EGR rate, temperature and pressure, and crucially, the predictive power of quasi-dimensional burn rate, emission or knock models is very sensitive to these parameters. Such an approach thus yields results of questionable reliability, with the risk of overlooking critical conditions that have to be addressed later on at much higher costs. Existing data-based approaches avoid these challenges, but fail to depict relevant physical processes in the flow path predictively (boost pressure built-up etc.), making it hardly possible to assess technologies such as variable valve trains. Therefore Robert Bosch GmbH and FKFS developed a new simulation approach. The new tool presented in this paper thus combines a physics-based model for the gas exchange (intake and exhaust system) with a data-based model for the high pressure-part, using mean effective pressure and emission values derived from the test bench or detailed 1D flow simulation. This solves the aforementioned dilemma and provides at the same time an easy way to use test bench data for RDE simulations and powertrain analysis. The implementation of such an approach will be presented in this paper, along with some exemplary results showing how the new tool can be used to generate accurate and reliable results for RDE investigations at minimal computational cost. VDI-Berichte Nr. 2373, 2020 344 https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181023730-I-343 Generiert durch IP '54.244.78.42', am 12.11.2021, 10:42:26. Das Erstellen und Weitergeben von Kopien dieses PDFs ist nicht zulässig. RDE Challenge and Existing SimulationTools From 2017 on new passenger cars in the EU have to fulfil exhaust gas emission limits also under RDE conditions. While the emission limits will tighten from current Euro 6d-TEMP to Euro 6d in 2020 and Euro 7 beyond the RDE regulation includes many drive requests that go beyond the current pre-defined driving cycles. E.g. on the one hand vehicle speeds up to 160 km/h and severe accelerations on inclining roads can cause high raw emissions that have to be converted reliably by exhaust gas aftertreatment (EAT). On the other hand low ambient temperatures (down to -7°C), long single stop durations (up to 5 minutes) and downhill drives can lead to an underrun of the lower operational temperature limits of the EAT components. In the near future the latter issue might be even strengthened by two striven efficiencyenhancing measures – hybridization with longer ICE standstill periods and reduction of fuel demanding cold start heating strategies. A series of the RDE requests as well as the emission calculation itself are related to extensive drive sections or even the full RDE drive. As a consequence the substitution of RDE drives by a small number of representative powertrain operation sequences is only possible to a very limited extent. The consideration of RDE performance within powertrain and EAT concept evaluation causes thereby a high testing effort which might even be complicated by missing hardware during early concept phase. 0D/1D powertrain simulation including the prediction of the thermal behaviour of ICE and EAT as well as EAT conversion rates could help to virtualize RDE tests in order to save time and costs of powertrain development. Additionally simulation can be used for synthetic RDE driving profile generation to create “worst-case” drives, either by combining a variety of cut up measured real driving sequences or by utilizing stochastic driving parameter distributions derived from them. Fundamental condition for harnessing the potentials of virtual RDE tests is a simulation tool that constitutes an optimal compromise between predictability, flexibility and simulation time. Assessing existing simulation approaches shows that all of them have severe drawbacks regarding this demand profile (see Fig. 1): 1. Detailed 1D flow simulation model coupled with quasi-dimensional models Physical modeling has proven itself to be a valuable tool in the development of engine technologies: especially 1D-CFD allows the modeling of the whole combustion engine with great flexibility and moderate effort. Air system dynamics, EGR-mixing and the gas exchange can be simulated accurately. Combustion models are available in a broad variety from measured burn rates over simple Vibe approximations up to phenomenological approaches that allow the prediction of the rate of heat release ([1]-[3]). The application ranges from very earVDI-Berichte Nr. 2373, 2020 345 https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181023730-I-343 Generiert durch IP '54.244.78.42', am 12.11.2021, 10:42:26. Das Erstellen und Weitergeben von Kopien dieses PDFs ist nicht zulässig. ly stages in the development where the engine hardware is not necessarily defined or available until the support of function development and software calibration in the final development stages. Virtual hardware components like turbochargers can be matched to the respective requirements or EGR control strategies can be evaluated. All in all it represents a very powerful tool, albeit with a crucial drawback with regard to RDE boundary conditions: computational times (real time factor 50...200, [4]), although rather low compared to 3D-CFD simulations, are still quite high – too high for the high amount of different operating conditions that has to be tested for RDE development. To a limited degree, this can be mitigated by using smart features like master/slave modes for the cylinder objects in full engine models, allowing to reduce the computational effort for the high pressure part distinctly (e. g. almost 75% in a four-cylinder engine). However, as the main part of the computational time is consumed by the flow simulation, the overall reduction is insufficient for RDE demands. 2. Fast-running 1D flow simulation model coupled with quasi-dimensional models This approach addresses exactly the already mentioned, high computational effort for 1D CFD flow simulation. The basic idea is to lump various flow volumes together, reducing thus the number of required calculations per time step while enabling a larger time step size at the same time. A considerable reduction in simulation time can be reached in this way, coming close to real time capability depending on the level of simplification (a factor of two compared to real time can be considered as a typical value), which is definitively enough to qualify for the \"fast\" tag. However, this approach inevitably changes the model's ability to predict pressure waves in the flow part – actually one of the most important benefits of 1D simulation compared to a pure 0D approach – leading to significant changes in the boundary conditions at IVC for the high pressure part. By nature quasidimensional models are very sensitive to these starting conditions (not unlike the real engine), so they should only be used with flow models that can deliver accurate boundary conditions for the combustion. 3. Data-based models/mean value models Data-based approaches are the tools of choice when it is required to quantify characterize existing systems accurately. Here, former map-based interpolations are increasingly replaced by statistical models that are able to describe the desired result value in dependence of more than just one to three input parameters, which are typical for maps. This can either be necessary to describe results depending on the degrees of freedom of operation that modern engines provide or to represent the deviations from stationary operation an engine faces while operated under highly transient conditions. Besides the proven fulfillment of acVDI-Berichte Nr. 2373, 2020 346 https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181023730-I-343 Generiert durch IP '54.244.78.42', am 12.11.2021, 10:42:26. Das Erstellen und Weitergeben von Kopien dieses PDFs ist nicht zulässig. curacy demands, trained data models can be evaluated with nearly no computational effort. Here the limitation is the extrapolation capability – data based models can only provide trustful information where training data was available. In particular this means that changes in the intake or exhaust system compared to the original configuration cannot be taken into account in the simulation model, making it highly inflexible and unsuitable for tasks like function development and calibration. Fig. 1: Positioning of different simulation set-ups along the three basic requirements for RDE simulations (DET: detailed 1D flow simulation model coupled with quasidimensional models; FRF: Fast-running 1D flow simulation model coupled with quasidimensional models, DAT: data-based models/mean value models) Basic Idea for New Tool To get a fast, accurate and flexible simulati","PeriodicalId":244804,"journal":{"name":"Dritev – Drivetrain for Vehicles 2020","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dritev – Drivetrain for Vehicles 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181023730-i-343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the introduction of "Real Driving Emissions" (RDE) powertrain simulation has become indispensable to identify critical operating conditions for the exhaust aftertreatment system at an early stage in the development process and to analyze possible corrective actions. Therefore a rudimentary virtual RDE calibration is also necessary in the early concept phase. For doing so, it makes a lot of sense to use 1D flow simulation to model effects such as boost pressure built-up, high/low pressure EGR travel times or thermal inertia. There are two challenges regarding 1D simulation of RDE:  Combustion system development is usually done at single cylinder engines. It is necessary to integrate the results of the single cylinder engine in an effective way into a virtual full engine for RDE investigations and first virtual calibration  Moreover, it is typically necessary to investigate a vast number of RDE driving patterns, taking up much more computational time than it was the case previously with a single type-approval driving cycle. Consequently, "Fast Running Models" (FRM) that reduce the computational effort needed for flow simulation have been used to counteract this increase. However, it is inevitable that such an approach reduces the accuracy of the boundary conditions at intake valve closing (IVC), e.g. EGR rate, temperature and pressure, and crucially, the predictive power of quasi-dimensional burn rate, emission or knock models is very sensitive to these parameters. Such an approach thus yields results of questionable reliability, with the risk of overlooking critical conditions that have to be addressed later on at much higher costs. Existing data-based approaches avoid these challenges, but fail to depict relevant physical processes in the flow path predictively (boost pressure built-up etc.), making it hardly possible to assess technologies such as variable valve trains. Therefore Robert Bosch GmbH and FKFS developed a new simulation approach. The new tool presented in this paper thus combines a physics-based model for the gas exchange (intake and exhaust system) with a data-based model for the high pressure-part, using mean effective pressure and emission values derived from the test bench or detailed 1D flow simulation. This solves the aforementioned dilemma and provides at the same time an easy way to use test bench data for RDE simulations and powertrain analysis. The implementation of such an approach will be presented in this paper, along with some exemplary results showing how the new tool can be used to generate accurate and reliable results for RDE investigations at minimal computational cost. VDI-Berichte Nr. 2373, 2020 344 https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181023730-I-343 Generiert durch IP '54.244.78.42', am 12.11.2021, 10:42:26. Das Erstellen und Weitergeben von Kopien dieses PDFs ist nicht zulässig. RDE Challenge and Existing SimulationTools From 2017 on new passenger cars in the EU have to fulfil exhaust gas emission limits also under RDE conditions. While the emission limits will tighten from current Euro 6d-TEMP to Euro 6d in 2020 and Euro 7 beyond the RDE regulation includes many drive requests that go beyond the current pre-defined driving cycles. E.g. on the one hand vehicle speeds up to 160 km/h and severe accelerations on inclining roads can cause high raw emissions that have to be converted reliably by exhaust gas aftertreatment (EAT). On the other hand low ambient temperatures (down to -7°C), long single stop durations (up to 5 minutes) and downhill drives can lead to an underrun of the lower operational temperature limits of the EAT components. In the near future the latter issue might be even strengthened by two striven efficiencyenhancing measures – hybridization with longer ICE standstill periods and reduction of fuel demanding cold start heating strategies. A series of the RDE requests as well as the emission calculation itself are related to extensive drive sections or even the full RDE drive. As a consequence the substitution of RDE drives by a small number of representative powertrain operation sequences is only possible to a very limited extent. The consideration of RDE performance within powertrain and EAT concept evaluation causes thereby a high testing effort which might even be complicated by missing hardware during early concept phase. 0D/1D powertrain simulation including the prediction of the thermal behaviour of ICE and EAT as well as EAT conversion rates could help to virtualize RDE tests in order to save time and costs of powertrain development. Additionally simulation can be used for synthetic RDE driving profile generation to create “worst-case” drives, either by combining a variety of cut up measured real driving sequences or by utilizing stochastic driving parameter distributions derived from them. Fundamental condition for harnessing the potentials of virtual RDE tests is a simulation tool that constitutes an optimal compromise between predictability, flexibility and simulation time. Assessing existing simulation approaches shows that all of them have severe drawbacks regarding this demand profile (see Fig. 1): 1. Detailed 1D flow simulation model coupled with quasi-dimensional models Physical modeling has proven itself to be a valuable tool in the development of engine technologies: especially 1D-CFD allows the modeling of the whole combustion engine with great flexibility and moderate effort. Air system dynamics, EGR-mixing and the gas exchange can be simulated accurately. Combustion models are available in a broad variety from measured burn rates over simple Vibe approximations up to phenomenological approaches that allow the prediction of the rate of heat release ([1]-[3]). The application ranges from very earVDI-Berichte Nr. 2373, 2020 345 https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181023730-I-343 Generiert durch IP '54.244.78.42', am 12.11.2021, 10:42:26. Das Erstellen und Weitergeben von Kopien dieses PDFs ist nicht zulässig. ly stages in the development where the engine hardware is not necessarily defined or available until the support of function development and software calibration in the final development stages. Virtual hardware components like turbochargers can be matched to the respective requirements or EGR control strategies can be evaluated. All in all it represents a very powerful tool, albeit with a crucial drawback with regard to RDE boundary conditions: computational times (real time factor 50...200, [4]), although rather low compared to 3D-CFD simulations, are still quite high – too high for the high amount of different operating conditions that has to be tested for RDE development. To a limited degree, this can be mitigated by using smart features like master/slave modes for the cylinder objects in full engine models, allowing to reduce the computational effort for the high pressure part distinctly (e. g. almost 75% in a four-cylinder engine). However, as the main part of the computational time is consumed by the flow simulation, the overall reduction is insufficient for RDE demands. 2. Fast-running 1D flow simulation model coupled with quasi-dimensional models This approach addresses exactly the already mentioned, high computational effort for 1D CFD flow simulation. The basic idea is to lump various flow volumes together, reducing thus the number of required calculations per time step while enabling a larger time step size at the same time. A considerable reduction in simulation time can be reached in this way, coming close to real time capability depending on the level of simplification (a factor of two compared to real time can be considered as a typical value), which is definitively enough to qualify for the "fast" tag. However, this approach inevitably changes the model's ability to predict pressure waves in the flow part – actually one of the most important benefits of 1D simulation compared to a pure 0D approach – leading to significant changes in the boundary conditions at IVC for the high pressure part. By nature quasidimensional models are very sensitive to these starting conditions (not unlike the real engine), so they should only be used with flow models that can deliver accurate boundary conditions for the combustion. 3. Data-based models/mean value models Data-based approaches are the tools of choice when it is required to quantify characterize existing systems accurately. Here, former map-based interpolations are increasingly replaced by statistical models that are able to describe the desired result value in dependence of more than just one to three input parameters, which are typical for maps. This can either be necessary to describe results depending on the degrees of freedom of operation that modern engines provide or to represent the deviations from stationary operation an engine faces while operated under highly transient conditions. Besides the proven fulfillment of acVDI-Berichte Nr. 2373, 2020 346 https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181023730-I-343 Generiert durch IP '54.244.78.42', am 12.11.2021, 10:42:26. Das Erstellen und Weitergeben von Kopien dieses PDFs ist nicht zulässig. curacy demands, trained data models can be evaluated with nearly no computational effort. Here the limitation is the extrapolation capability – data based models can only provide trustful information where training data was available. In particular this means that changes in the intake or exhaust system compared to the original configuration cannot be taken into account in the simulation model, making it highly inflexible and unsuitable for tasks like function development and calibration. Fig. 1: Positioning of different simulation set-ups along the three basic requirements for RDE simulations (DET: detailed 1D flow simulation model coupled with quasidimensional models; FRF: Fast-running 1D flow simulation model coupled with quasidimensional models, DAT: data-based models/mean value models) Basic Idea for New Tool To get a fast, accurate and flexible simulati
虚拟RDE:确保混合动力系统在开发过程的早期阶段符合RDE要求
利用虚拟RDE测试潜力的基本条件是一种模拟工具,它在可预测性、灵活性和模拟时间之间实现了最佳折衷。对现有模拟方法的评估表明,所有这些方法都有严重的缺陷(参见图1):1。物理建模已被证明是发动机技术发展的宝贵工具,特别是一维cfd可以灵活而省力地对整个内燃机进行建模。空气系统动力学,egr混合和气体交换可以准确地模拟。燃烧模型的种类繁多,从简单的Vibe近似测量的燃烧速率到允许预测热释放速率的现象学方法([1]-[3])。应用范围从非常earVDI-Berichte号2373,2020 345 https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181023730-I-343 Generiert durch IP '54.244.78.42', am 12.11.2021, 10:42:26。Das Erstellen和Weitergeben von Kopien dieses pdf第一晚zulässig。在最后的开发阶段,在功能开发和软件校准支持之前,发动机硬件没有必要定义或可用。像涡轮增压器这样的虚拟硬件组件可以匹配各自的要求,或者可以评估EGR控制策略。总而言之,它代表了一个非常强大的工具,尽管在RDE边界条件方面有一个关键的缺点:计算时间(实时因子50…200,[4]),虽然与3D-CFD模拟相比相当低,但仍然相当高——对于RDE开发必须测试的大量不同操作条件来说太高了。在一定程度上,这可以通过在全发动机模型中使用主/从模式等智能功能来缓解,从而明显减少高压部分的计算工作量(例如,在四缸发动机中几乎减少75%)。然而,由于大部分计算时间被流动模拟所消耗,总体上的减少不足以满足RDE的需求。2. 这种方法正好解决了前面提到的一维CFD流动模拟计算量大的问题。其基本思想是将各种流量合并在一起,从而减少每个时间步长所需的计算次数,同时实现更大的时间步长。通过这种方式可以大大减少模拟时间,接近实时能力,这取决于简化程度(与实时相比的两个因素可以被视为典型值),这绝对足以符合“快速”标签的要求。然而,这种方法不可避免地改变了模型预测流动部分压力波的能力,这实际上是1D模拟与纯0D方法相比最重要的好处之一,导致高压部分IVC的边界条件发生重大变化。从本质上讲,准尺寸模型对这些启动条件非常敏感(与真实的发动机没有什么不同),因此它们只能与能够提供准确的燃烧边界条件的流动模型一起使用。3.基于数据的模型/平均值模型当需要准确地量化现有系统的特征时,基于数据的方法是首选的工具。在这里,以前基于地图的插值越来越多地被统计模型所取代,这些模型能够描述期望的结果值,依赖于不止一到三个输入参数,这是地图的典型特征。这对于描述现代发动机提供的依赖于运行自由度的结果或表示发动机在高度瞬态条件下运行时所面临的与静止运行的偏差是必要的。此外,acVDI-Berichte编号2373,2020 346 https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181023730-I-343 Generiert durch IP '54.244.78.42', am 12.11.2021, 10:42:26。Das Erstellen和Weitergeben von Kopien dieses pdf第一晚zulässig。准确性要求,训练过的数据模型几乎不需要计算就可以进行评估。这里的限制是外推能力——基于数据的模型只能在训练数据可用的地方提供可信的信息。特别是,这意味着与原始配置相比,进气或排气系统的变化不能在仿真模型中考虑在内,使其高度不灵活,不适合功能开发和校准等任务。无花果。 1:根据RDE模拟的三个基本要求定位不同的模拟装置(DET:详细的一维流动模拟模型与准维模型耦合;FRF:快速运行的一维流动模拟模型,加上准维模型;DAT:基于数据的模型/平均值模型)新工具的基本思想获得快速、准确和灵活的模拟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信