{"title":"Wave-induced drift and mixing","authors":"N. Rascle, F. Ardhuin","doi":"10.1109/OCEANSE.2005.1513147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past 10 years, several investigations have revealed that waves dramatically enhance the turbulent mixing near the surface (e.g. Agrawal et al., 1992). Besides, waves are known to have a non-zero mean motion in the direction of propagation: the Stokes drift. In a rotating frame, waves also induce a stress to the right of the direction of propagation: the Hasselmann force or \"Stokes-Coriolis\" effect. This effect is believed to compensate the Stokes drift by driving the mean flow in the opposite direction, and recent studies have proposed that it significantly modifies the profile of the Eulerian current near the surface (Lewis and Belcher, 2004). To embrace all these effects, a model of the ocean mixed layer is proposed. The motion is separated into a quasi-Eulerian mean flow and the wave-induced Stokes drift. Sigma coordinates are used to follow the surface motion (Mellor, 2003). This yields equations for the mean flow that are compatible to those of ocean-circulation models, with the wave part acting as a supplementary forcing. A 2.5 level turbulence closure scheme is used, in which dissipation of waves enhances turbulent kinetic energy near the surface. The different effects are investigated and the model is validated with measured profiles of turbulent kinetic energy (Terray et al., 1996), shear of Eulerian currents (Santala and Terray, 1992) and Lagrangian surface drifts. The model is generally consistent with all these observation, and suggests that surface drift observations, of the order of 3% of the wind speed, must be related to a strong surface shear that mainly comes from the shear of the Stokes drift. Essentially, a strong surface mixing is incompatible with large surface shears of the quasi-Eulerian velocity. Still, the model mean water velocities are only about 60% of observed drift velocities. The model also suggests a dependence of surface mixing and drift on the state of development of the waves that can be represented by a wave age parameter. It raises the question of the adequacy of parameterisations based on the wind only, as usual in ocean circulation models. We argue for a coupled wave-circulation model, particularly for fetch limited conditions often met in coastal areas, and estimate the likely impact on upwelling-type circulations.","PeriodicalId":120840,"journal":{"name":"Europe Oceans 2005","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europe Oceans 2005","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSE.2005.1513147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the past 10 years, several investigations have revealed that waves dramatically enhance the turbulent mixing near the surface (e.g. Agrawal et al., 1992). Besides, waves are known to have a non-zero mean motion in the direction of propagation: the Stokes drift. In a rotating frame, waves also induce a stress to the right of the direction of propagation: the Hasselmann force or "Stokes-Coriolis" effect. This effect is believed to compensate the Stokes drift by driving the mean flow in the opposite direction, and recent studies have proposed that it significantly modifies the profile of the Eulerian current near the surface (Lewis and Belcher, 2004). To embrace all these effects, a model of the ocean mixed layer is proposed. The motion is separated into a quasi-Eulerian mean flow and the wave-induced Stokes drift. Sigma coordinates are used to follow the surface motion (Mellor, 2003). This yields equations for the mean flow that are compatible to those of ocean-circulation models, with the wave part acting as a supplementary forcing. A 2.5 level turbulence closure scheme is used, in which dissipation of waves enhances turbulent kinetic energy near the surface. The different effects are investigated and the model is validated with measured profiles of turbulent kinetic energy (Terray et al., 1996), shear of Eulerian currents (Santala and Terray, 1992) and Lagrangian surface drifts. The model is generally consistent with all these observation, and suggests that surface drift observations, of the order of 3% of the wind speed, must be related to a strong surface shear that mainly comes from the shear of the Stokes drift. Essentially, a strong surface mixing is incompatible with large surface shears of the quasi-Eulerian velocity. Still, the model mean water velocities are only about 60% of observed drift velocities. The model also suggests a dependence of surface mixing and drift on the state of development of the waves that can be represented by a wave age parameter. It raises the question of the adequacy of parameterisations based on the wind only, as usual in ocean circulation models. We argue for a coupled wave-circulation model, particularly for fetch limited conditions often met in coastal areas, and estimate the likely impact on upwelling-type circulations.
在过去的10年里,一些研究表明,波浪极大地增强了地表附近的湍流混合(如Agrawal等人,1992)。此外,已知波在传播方向上具有非零的平均运动:斯托克斯漂移。在旋转的框架中,波也会在传播方向的右侧产生一个应力:哈塞曼力或“斯托克斯-科里奥利”效应。这种效应被认为通过推动平均流向相反方向来补偿斯托克斯漂移,最近的研究提出,它显著地改变了地表附近欧拉流的剖面(Lewis和Belcher, 2004)。为了包含所有这些影响,提出了一个海洋混合层模型。运动分为准欧拉平均流和波致斯托克斯漂移。Sigma坐标用于跟踪表面运动(Mellor, 2003)。这就得到了与海洋环流模式相容的平均流量方程,其中波浪部分起着补充作用力的作用。采用2.5级湍流闭合方案,波的耗散增强了表面附近的湍流动能。研究了不同的影响,并用湍流动能(Terray et al., 1996)、欧拉流剪切(Santala and Terray, 1992)和拉格朗日表面漂移的实测剖面验证了模型。该模型与上述观测结果基本一致,表明地表漂移观测值(约为风速的3%)一定与强烈的地表切变有关,这种切变主要来自于Stokes漂移的切变。本质上,强表面混合与大的准欧拉速度的表面剪切是不相容的。尽管如此,该模型的平均水流速度仅为观测到的漂流速度的60%左右。该模型还表明,表面混合和漂移与波浪的发展状态有关,波浪的发展状态可以用波浪年龄参数表示。它提出了仅仅基于风的参数化是否足够的问题,就像在海洋环流模式中通常的那样。我们主张一个耦合的波浪-环流模式,特别是在沿海地区经常遇到的有限条件下,并估计对上升流型环流的可能影响。