Stressed and Unstressed Syllable Alternation in Educated Edo (Nigerian) English

J. Akindele
{"title":"Stressed and Unstressed Syllable Alternation in Educated Edo (Nigerian) English","authors":"J. Akindele","doi":"10.17323/2411-7390-2017-3-4-52-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard British English (SBE) rhythm is characterised by stressed and unstressed syllable alternation. Phonological investigations from non-native English such as Nigerian English (NE) have claimed that NE differs remarkably from SBE, especially in the area of rhythm. Existing phonological studies on Educated Edo English (EEE) – a sub-variety of NE – have been on word and variable stress while studies on stressed and unstressed syllable alternation have been rare. This study, therefore, investigated the extent to which Educated Edo English Speakers (EEES) stressed and unstressed syllable alternation conforms to SBE rhythm. Prince and Liberman’s (1977) metrical theory, which explains the alternation of strong and weak constituents in SBE rhythm units, served as a theoretical framework. A purposive sampling technique was used to select 150 (75 males and 75 females) EEES while 2 SBE speakers served as Native Baselines (NB). Speech Filing System (SFS) version 1.41 was used to record the production of a validated instrument of 40 rhythm units, with stressed and unstressed syllable alternation. The recordings were transcribed and subjected to a perceptual analysis (frequency and percentages). Out of 6000 expected instances of stressed and unstressed syllable alternation, the participants had 694 (11.6%), while inappropriate use was higher, with 5,306 (88.4%). The performance of EEES males showed 5.7% and the females 5.9%. The grids of EEES showed proliferation of Strong/Strong (S/S) juxtaposition of stressed and unstressed syllables in rhythm units, compared to the NB alternation of Weak/Strong (W/S) or Strong/Weak (S/W). Results confirmed that EEES alternation of stressed and unstressed syllables in rhythm units differ ‘markedly’ from those of the SBE form. \n  \nThis article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.","PeriodicalId":339853,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Anthropology eJournal","volume":"61 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Anthropology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2017-3-4-52-59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Standard British English (SBE) rhythm is characterised by stressed and unstressed syllable alternation. Phonological investigations from non-native English such as Nigerian English (NE) have claimed that NE differs remarkably from SBE, especially in the area of rhythm. Existing phonological studies on Educated Edo English (EEE) – a sub-variety of NE – have been on word and variable stress while studies on stressed and unstressed syllable alternation have been rare. This study, therefore, investigated the extent to which Educated Edo English Speakers (EEES) stressed and unstressed syllable alternation conforms to SBE rhythm. Prince and Liberman’s (1977) metrical theory, which explains the alternation of strong and weak constituents in SBE rhythm units, served as a theoretical framework. A purposive sampling technique was used to select 150 (75 males and 75 females) EEES while 2 SBE speakers served as Native Baselines (NB). Speech Filing System (SFS) version 1.41 was used to record the production of a validated instrument of 40 rhythm units, with stressed and unstressed syllable alternation. The recordings were transcribed and subjected to a perceptual analysis (frequency and percentages). Out of 6000 expected instances of stressed and unstressed syllable alternation, the participants had 694 (11.6%), while inappropriate use was higher, with 5,306 (88.4%). The performance of EEES males showed 5.7% and the females 5.9%. The grids of EEES showed proliferation of Strong/Strong (S/S) juxtaposition of stressed and unstressed syllables in rhythm units, compared to the NB alternation of Weak/Strong (W/S) or Strong/Weak (S/W). Results confirmed that EEES alternation of stressed and unstressed syllables in rhythm units differ ‘markedly’ from those of the SBE form.   This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
受教育的埃多(尼日利亚)英语中重音和非重读音节的变化
标准英式英语(SBE)节奏的特点是重读音节和非重读音节交替。来自非母语英语(如尼日利亚英语)的音韵学研究表明,尼日利亚英语与SBE有很大的不同,尤其是在节奏方面。教育江户英语是东北语的一个分支,现有的音韵学研究主要集中在单词重音和变重音上,而关于重音和非重读音节交替的研究很少。因此,本研究调查了江户教育英语使用者(EEES)重读音节和非重读音节的变化在多大程度上符合SBE节奏。Prince和Liberman(1977)的格律理论作为理论框架,解释了SBE节奏单元中强弱成分的交替。采用有目的抽样方法,选取150名EEES(男75名,女75名),2名SBE speaker作为Native baseline (NB)。使用语音文件系统(SFS) 1.41版本记录了40个节奏单元的验证乐器的产生,其中有重读音节和非重读音节交替。录音被转录并进行感知分析(频率和百分比)。在6000个预期的重读音节和非重读音节交替中,参与者有694个(11.6%),而不恰当的使用则更高,有5306个(88.4%)。EEES男性的表现为5.7%,女性为5.9%。与弱/强(W/S)或强/弱(S/W)的NB交替相比,EEES的网格显示出重音和非重音音节在节奏单位上的强/强(S/S)并置的扩散。结果证实,EEES在节奏单元中重读音节和非重读音节的变化与SBE形式“明显”不同。本文基于知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信