Evolving e-government benchmarking to better cover technology development and emerging societal needs

K. Andreasson, J. Millard, M. Snaprud
{"title":"Evolving e-government benchmarking to better cover technology development and emerging societal needs","authors":"K. Andreasson, J. Millard, M. Snaprud","doi":"10.1145/2463728.2463811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many international e-government benchmarks seek to measure progress towards various versions of a digital society, and in this endeavor include a component of e-government. But because comparable international e-government data are scarce, most reports rely on the United Nations E-Government Development Index, specifically its Online Service Index as a benchmark. However, this assessment only captures national level initiatives at a broad level and does not link evaluation to outcomes and impacts, i.e. e-government performance relative to investment.\n This paper briefly reviews the current UN framework and assesses how it can evolve to meet new demands, such as calls to better connect investments to policy goals, and evolving user behavior. It also places this in the context of new technology trends, like mobile and social media which have not yet been fully embraced by e-government but which are likely to become increasingly important. Similarly, important trends in benchmarking and in benchmarking tools are surveyed.\n For example, is it possible to measure outcomes in a cost effective manner? What might be the role of non-UN data and of web metrics and social media analytics? How could relevant data and other information be better presented to countries and decision-makers in order to strengthen the goal of using the UN survey to support learning and improvement? In this context, the paper outlines the next feasible steps which the UN and similar benchmarks might adopt, including how the framework might be applied to local level assessments.","PeriodicalId":135802,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","volume":"834 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2463728.2463811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Many international e-government benchmarks seek to measure progress towards various versions of a digital society, and in this endeavor include a component of e-government. But because comparable international e-government data are scarce, most reports rely on the United Nations E-Government Development Index, specifically its Online Service Index as a benchmark. However, this assessment only captures national level initiatives at a broad level and does not link evaluation to outcomes and impacts, i.e. e-government performance relative to investment. This paper briefly reviews the current UN framework and assesses how it can evolve to meet new demands, such as calls to better connect investments to policy goals, and evolving user behavior. It also places this in the context of new technology trends, like mobile and social media which have not yet been fully embraced by e-government but which are likely to become increasingly important. Similarly, important trends in benchmarking and in benchmarking tools are surveyed. For example, is it possible to measure outcomes in a cost effective manner? What might be the role of non-UN data and of web metrics and social media analytics? How could relevant data and other information be better presented to countries and decision-makers in order to strengthen the goal of using the UN survey to support learning and improvement? In this context, the paper outlines the next feasible steps which the UN and similar benchmarks might adopt, including how the framework might be applied to local level assessments.
不断发展电子政府基准,以更好地涵盖科技发展和新出现的社会需求
许多国际电子政务基准试图衡量迈向不同版本的数字社会的进展,并在这一努力中包括电子政务的一个组成部分。但由于可比较的国际电子政务数据很少,大多数报告都依赖联合国电子政务发展指数,特别是其在线服务指数作为基准。然而,这一评估只涵盖了国家层面的广泛举措,而没有将评估与结果和影响联系起来,即与投资相关的电子政务绩效。本文简要回顾了当前的联合国框架,并评估了它如何发展以满足新的需求,例如呼吁更好地将投资与政策目标联系起来,以及不断发展的用户行为。它还把这一点放在新技术趋势的背景下,比如移动和社交媒体,它们还没有完全被电子政务所接受,但可能会变得越来越重要。同样,对基准测试和基准测试工具的重要趋势进行了调查。例如,是否可能以具有成本效益的方式衡量结果?非联合国数据、网络指标和社交媒体分析可能发挥什么作用?如何才能更好地向各国和决策者提供相关数据和其他信息,以加强利用联合国调查支持学习和改进的目标?在此背景下,该文件概述了联合国和类似基准可能采取的下一步可行步骤,包括如何将框架应用于地方一级的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信