Does the evidence support collaboration between psychiatry and traditional healers? Findings from three South African studies : review article

B. Robertson
{"title":"Does the evidence support collaboration between psychiatry and traditional healers? Findings from three South African studies : review article","authors":"B. Robertson","doi":"10.4314/AJPSY.V9I2.30210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is estimated that 70% of South Africans consult traditional healers, who include diviners, herbalists, faith healers and traditional birth \nattendants. Calls from the new democratic South African government for medical practitioners to collaborate with traditional healers \nescalated during the nineties, and the draft Traditional Health Practitioners Bill of South Africa was unanimously approved by parliament \nin September 2004. The author felt that there is a significant lack of information about the contribution of traditional healers in South \nAfrica to mental health, and over recent years conducted three studies designed to fill some of the gaps. The combined data of the \nstudies suggests that, while traditional healers provide a valued mental health service to certain types of clients, they resemble faithbased \npractitioners and counsellors more than medical practitioners. The author concludes that collaboration should be promoted, but \nfurther knowledge and debate is needed about the best way for mental health practitioners to collaborate with traditional healers, and \non what basis it should be founded.","PeriodicalId":131071,"journal":{"name":"South African psychiatry review","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African psychiatry review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJPSY.V9I2.30210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

It is estimated that 70% of South Africans consult traditional healers, who include diviners, herbalists, faith healers and traditional birth attendants. Calls from the new democratic South African government for medical practitioners to collaborate with traditional healers escalated during the nineties, and the draft Traditional Health Practitioners Bill of South Africa was unanimously approved by parliament in September 2004. The author felt that there is a significant lack of information about the contribution of traditional healers in South Africa to mental health, and over recent years conducted three studies designed to fill some of the gaps. The combined data of the studies suggests that, while traditional healers provide a valued mental health service to certain types of clients, they resemble faithbased practitioners and counsellors more than medical practitioners. The author concludes that collaboration should be promoted, but further knowledge and debate is needed about the best way for mental health practitioners to collaborate with traditional healers, and on what basis it should be founded.
证据是否支持精神病学和传统治疗师之间的合作?来自三项南非研究的发现:综述文章
据估计,70%的南非人咨询传统治疗师,包括占卜者、草药医生、信仰治疗师和传统助产士。20世纪90年代,新的民主南非政府呼吁医疗从业者与传统治疗师合作,南非传统医疗从业者法案草案于2004年9月获得议会一致通过。提交人认为,关于南非传统治疗师对精神健康的贡献的信息严重缺乏,近年来进行了三项研究,旨在填补一些空白。这些研究的综合数据表明,虽然传统治疗师为某些类型的客户提供了有价值的心理健康服务,但他们更像基于信仰的从业者和咨询师,而不是医疗从业者。作者的结论是,应该促进合作,但是需要进一步了解和讨论精神卫生从业人员与传统治疗师合作的最佳方式,以及这种合作应该建立在什么基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信