Detection of Fraudulent Transactions in Credit Card using Machine Learning Algorithms

Praveen Kumar Sadineni
{"title":"Detection of Fraudulent Transactions in Credit Card using Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"Praveen Kumar Sadineni","doi":"10.1109/I-SMAC49090.2020.9243545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today we are living in a digital world where most of the activities performed are online. Fraud transactions are ever growing since the growth of ecommerce applications. Millions of transactions are happening around every second everyday giving us the benefit of enjoying financial services through credit and debit cards. Fraud transactions are allowing illegal users to misuse the money of genuine users causing them financial loss. Accessibility of credit card transactions data, techniques used by the frauds, identifying scams in the bulk data which is getting produced very quickly, imbalanced data are some of the major challenges involved in detecting fraudulent credit card transactions. Hence, we need powerful techniques to identify fraudulent transactions. The current paper deals with various machine learning techniques such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Trees, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression and Random Forest to detect fraudulent transactions. Performance analysis of these techniques is done using Accuracy, Precision and False alarm rate metrics. Dataset used to carry out the experiment is taken from Kaggle data repository. The experiment shows that Radom Forest could achieve an accuracy of 99.21%, Decision Tree 98.47%. Logistic Regression 95.55%, SVM 95.16% and ANN 99.92%.","PeriodicalId":432766,"journal":{"name":"2020 Fourth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Fourth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SMAC49090.2020.9243545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Today we are living in a digital world where most of the activities performed are online. Fraud transactions are ever growing since the growth of ecommerce applications. Millions of transactions are happening around every second everyday giving us the benefit of enjoying financial services through credit and debit cards. Fraud transactions are allowing illegal users to misuse the money of genuine users causing them financial loss. Accessibility of credit card transactions data, techniques used by the frauds, identifying scams in the bulk data which is getting produced very quickly, imbalanced data are some of the major challenges involved in detecting fraudulent credit card transactions. Hence, we need powerful techniques to identify fraudulent transactions. The current paper deals with various machine learning techniques such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Trees, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression and Random Forest to detect fraudulent transactions. Performance analysis of these techniques is done using Accuracy, Precision and False alarm rate metrics. Dataset used to carry out the experiment is taken from Kaggle data repository. The experiment shows that Radom Forest could achieve an accuracy of 99.21%, Decision Tree 98.47%. Logistic Regression 95.55%, SVM 95.16% and ANN 99.92%.
利用机器学习算法检测信用卡欺诈交易
今天,我们生活在一个数字世界,大多数活动都是在网上进行的。随着电子商务应用的发展,欺诈交易越来越多。每时每刻都有数以百万计的交易发生,这让我们可以通过信用卡和借记卡享受金融服务。欺诈交易允许非法用户滥用真正用户的钱,给他们造成经济损失。信用卡交易数据的可访问性、欺诈者使用的技术、在快速生成的大量数据中识别骗局、不平衡数据是检测欺诈性信用卡交易所涉及的一些主要挑战。因此,我们需要强大的技术来识别欺诈性交易。本文涉及各种机器学习技术,如人工神经网络(ANN),决策树,支持向量机(SVM),逻辑回归和随机森林来检测欺诈交易。这些技术的性能分析是使用准确度、精度和虚警率指标来完成的。用于实验的数据集取自Kaggle数据库。实验表明,随机森林的准确率为99.21%,决策树的准确率为98.47%。Logistic回归95.55%,SVM 95.16%, ANN 99.92%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信