Evaluation of a Query-Obfuscation Mechanism for the Privacy Protection of User Profiles

José Estrada-Jiménez, A. Rodríguez, Javier Parra-Arnau, J. Forné
{"title":"Evaluation of a Query-Obfuscation Mechanism for the Privacy Protection of User Profiles","authors":"José Estrada-Jiménez, A. Rodríguez, Javier Parra-Arnau, J. Forné","doi":"10.5296/npa.v6i2.5395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traces related to our identity are left every day while we browse the Internet. Being the user’s information a very valued asset for most of the companies, user activities on Internet are permanently monitored, and the information obtained from this process is used by big advertising companies. Accurate user profiles are built based on web searches, tags, tweets and even clicks issued by users. Collecting and processing this huge amount of personal data represents a serious risk for the user’s privacy but most of people are not aware of such risk. We describe in this paper a way to measure the effectiveness of a query obfuscation method. Since privacy level of user profiles is only estimated theoretically in some previous work, we firstly create a privacy risk measuring tool in a Firefox add-on which we named PrivMeter. Besides warning the user about his privacy levels, this tool is especially useful to evaluate the obfuscation mechanism offered by another very well-known add-on called TrackMeNot. We find that, for identification attacks, TrackMeNot importantly improved the user’s privacy. However, against more sophisticated attacks, such as classification attacks, the obfuscation mechanism was not successful enough.","PeriodicalId":190994,"journal":{"name":"Netw. Protoc. Algorithms","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netw. Protoc. Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/npa.v6i2.5395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Traces related to our identity are left every day while we browse the Internet. Being the user’s information a very valued asset for most of the companies, user activities on Internet are permanently monitored, and the information obtained from this process is used by big advertising companies. Accurate user profiles are built based on web searches, tags, tweets and even clicks issued by users. Collecting and processing this huge amount of personal data represents a serious risk for the user’s privacy but most of people are not aware of such risk. We describe in this paper a way to measure the effectiveness of a query obfuscation method. Since privacy level of user profiles is only estimated theoretically in some previous work, we firstly create a privacy risk measuring tool in a Firefox add-on which we named PrivMeter. Besides warning the user about his privacy levels, this tool is especially useful to evaluate the obfuscation mechanism offered by another very well-known add-on called TrackMeNot. We find that, for identification attacks, TrackMeNot importantly improved the user’s privacy. However, against more sophisticated attacks, such as classification attacks, the obfuscation mechanism was not successful enough.
用户配置文件隐私保护的查询混淆机制评估
当我们每天浏览互联网时,都会留下与我们身份相关的痕迹。用户的信息是大多数公司非常宝贵的资产,用户在互联网上的活动被永久监控,从这个过程中获得的信息被大型广告公司使用。准确的用户档案是基于网络搜索、标签、推文甚至用户发出的点击来建立的。收集和处理如此大量的个人数据对用户的隐私构成了严重的风险,但大多数人并没有意识到这种风险。本文描述了一种测量查询混淆方法有效性的方法。由于用户档案的隐私级别在之前的一些工作中只是理论上估计的,我们首先在Firefox附加组件中创建了一个隐私风险测量工具,我们将其命名为PrivMeter。除了警告用户他的隐私级别之外,这个工具对于评估另一个非常著名的附加组件TrackMeNot提供的混淆机制特别有用。我们发现,对于身份识别攻击,TrackMeNot显著提高了用户的隐私。然而,对于更复杂的攻击,例如分类攻击,混淆机制不够成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信