A Comparative Study of RSA and ELGAMAL Cryptosystems

Paul K. Arhin Jnr, M. Asante, Linda Otoo
{"title":"A Comparative Study of RSA and ELGAMAL Cryptosystems","authors":"Paul K. Arhin Jnr, M. Asante, Linda Otoo","doi":"10.47941/ijce.1291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In this research, a comparative analysis of the RSA and ELGAMAL algorithms is presented using their encryption and decryption speed with different key sizes. ElGamal and RSA are two popular public-key cryptographic algorithms that depend on the mathematical difficulty of computing discrete logarithms in finite fields and factoring large integers, respectively. \nMethodology: In this study, the speed at which messages of various sizes can be encrypted and decrypted using various key sizes is used to gauge how well these algorithms work. \nFindings: RSA usually outperforms ElGamal in terms of encryption and decryption speed, according to the results. However, as the key sizes grow, the performance gap between the two algorithms narrows. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: These findings can aid in selecting the appropriate algorithm and key size for different applications that require secure communication and data encryption.","PeriodicalId":198033,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computing and Engineering","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computing and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijce.1291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In this research, a comparative analysis of the RSA and ELGAMAL algorithms is presented using their encryption and decryption speed with different key sizes. ElGamal and RSA are two popular public-key cryptographic algorithms that depend on the mathematical difficulty of computing discrete logarithms in finite fields and factoring large integers, respectively. Methodology: In this study, the speed at which messages of various sizes can be encrypted and decrypted using various key sizes is used to gauge how well these algorithms work. Findings: RSA usually outperforms ElGamal in terms of encryption and decryption speed, according to the results. However, as the key sizes grow, the performance gap between the two algorithms narrows. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: These findings can aid in selecting the appropriate algorithm and key size for different applications that require secure communication and data encryption.
RSA和ELGAMAL密码系统的比较研究
目的:在本研究中,比较分析了RSA和ELGAMAL算法在不同密钥大小下的加密和解密速度。ElGamal和RSA是两种流行的公钥加密算法,它们分别依赖于在有限域中计算离散对数和分解大整数的数学难度。方法:在本研究中,使用不同密钥大小对不同大小的消息进行加密和解密的速度被用来衡量这些算法的工作效果。结果显示,RSA在加密和解密速度方面通常优于ElGamal。然而,随着密钥大小的增加,两种算法之间的性能差距会缩小。对理论、政策和实践的独特贡献:这些发现有助于为需要安全通信和数据加密的不同应用程序选择合适的算法和密钥大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信