PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENGGUNA JASA TUKANG GIGI TERHADAP DUGAAN MALPRAKTIK

Dicky Nur Oktaviano Rizafaza, Y. A. Mangesti
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENGGUNA JASA TUKANG GIGI TERHADAP DUGAAN MALPRAKTIK","authors":"Dicky Nur Oktaviano Rizafaza, Y. A. Mangesti","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i3.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This legal research aims to determine the regulation of the practice of dental artisans in health services as well as to determine the legal protection of dental artisan service users in the practice of dental artisans. This research was conducted using normative legal research methods. The research approach is a legal approach (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). Based on this research, it was found that the regulation regarding dental practice refers to the Regulation of the Minister of Health no. 39 of 2014 concerning the Guidance, Supervision, Licensing and Employment of Dentists issued based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 40/PUU-X/2012 which is a Judicial Review decision. This rule does not provide legal protection for dental artisans who experience malpractice. Violations committed by dental artisans in carrying out their work cause victims to suffer losses. The legal implication of the absence of complete positive legal regulations and legal certainty from the government is an opportunity for dental artisans to practice or act beyond their authority, which results in the emergence of allegations of malpractice, which incur losses for consumers who perform dental care for the dental artisan. Legal protection should be provided through a new law on the practice of dental artisans which contains the authority of dental artisans so that there is a limit to the authority of dental artisans who are different from dentists. For dental artisans who practice as if they were dentists, they have violated Article 78 Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practices with criminal sanctions.","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This legal research aims to determine the regulation of the practice of dental artisans in health services as well as to determine the legal protection of dental artisan service users in the practice of dental artisans. This research was conducted using normative legal research methods. The research approach is a legal approach (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). Based on this research, it was found that the regulation regarding dental practice refers to the Regulation of the Minister of Health no. 39 of 2014 concerning the Guidance, Supervision, Licensing and Employment of Dentists issued based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 40/PUU-X/2012 which is a Judicial Review decision. This rule does not provide legal protection for dental artisans who experience malpractice. Violations committed by dental artisans in carrying out their work cause victims to suffer losses. The legal implication of the absence of complete positive legal regulations and legal certainty from the government is an opportunity for dental artisans to practice or act beyond their authority, which results in the emergence of allegations of malpractice, which incur losses for consumers who perform dental care for the dental artisan. Legal protection should be provided through a new law on the practice of dental artisans which contains the authority of dental artisans so that there is a limit to the authority of dental artisans who are different from dentists. For dental artisans who practice as if they were dentists, they have violated Article 78 Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practices with criminal sanctions.
牙科服务人员防止涉嫌渎职
这项法律研究的目的是确定对保健服务中牙科技工执业的监管,以及确定对牙科技工执业的牙科技工服务使用者的法律保护。本研究采用规范的法律研究方法进行。研究方法有法律方法(成文法方法)和概念方法(概念方法)。根据这一研究,发现有关牙科执业的条例指的是卫生部第369号条例。根据宪法法院第40/PUU-X/2012号决定(一项司法审查决定),2014年第39号关于牙医的指导、监督、许可和就业的法律。这条规则不提供法律保护牙科技工谁经历了医疗事故。牙科工匠在工作中所犯的违法行为使受害者遭受损失。缺乏完整的积极的法律法规和政府的法律确定性的法律含义是牙科工匠实践或超越其权力的机会,这导致了渎职指控的出现,这给为牙科工匠进行牙科护理的消费者带来了损失。应通过一项关于牙科技工执业的新法律提供法律保护,其中包含牙科技工的权威,以便限制与牙医不同的牙科技工的权威。对于以牙医身份执业的牙科工匠,他们违反了2004年关于医疗行为的第78号第29条,将受到刑事制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信