Variation in the shell elements of Chrysemys picta bellii (Gray 1831)

Joseph A. Corsini
{"title":"Variation in the shell elements of Chrysemys picta bellii (Gray 1831)","authors":"Joseph A. Corsini","doi":"10.18435/vamp29390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Variation in the Shell Elements of Chrysemys picta bellii (Gray 1831) \nAssignment of fossil turtle shell elements to a specific taxon is often difficult because the range of variation within the population is usually not well characterized. In addition, it is sometimes not clear whether the fossil forms actually differ from their extant counterparts because often the range of shell element variation in modern species has not been determined. The emydid turtles are no exception, with confusion often arising in the identification of isolated fossil elements and sometimes intact shells representing Emys, Pseudemys, Malaclemys, and Graptemys, as well as the deirochelyids Chrysemys,  Clemmys, Deirochelys, and Trachemys. In order to begin providing a database with modern counterparts of the deirochelyid turtles, I have photographed and illustrated seven extant Chrysemys picta bellii shells, six of which were collected at a single pond in Nebraska and one from Ladd Marsh in Union County, Oregon . Photographs and detailed illustrations indicate a broad range in the shapes of many characters.  Side by side comparisons of some key elements show that there is significant variation in several important characters (nuchal shape/sulci, entoplastron shape/sulci, and pygal shape/sulci). I also conducted a limited morphometric analysis of several sulcus/suture distance ratios, showing substantial variation between individuals in some cases. Covariance and correlation analysis of this variation suggests that allometry is not involved in most cases. In summary, this work provides a visual and morphometric dataset for aid in identifying and assigning shell elements of fossil emydid turtles.","PeriodicalId":256887,"journal":{"name":"Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology","volume":"17 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18435/vamp29390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variation in the Shell Elements of Chrysemys picta bellii (Gray 1831) Assignment of fossil turtle shell elements to a specific taxon is often difficult because the range of variation within the population is usually not well characterized. In addition, it is sometimes not clear whether the fossil forms actually differ from their extant counterparts because often the range of shell element variation in modern species has not been determined. The emydid turtles are no exception, with confusion often arising in the identification of isolated fossil elements and sometimes intact shells representing Emys, Pseudemys, Malaclemys, and Graptemys, as well as the deirochelyids Chrysemys,  Clemmys, Deirochelys, and Trachemys. In order to begin providing a database with modern counterparts of the deirochelyid turtles, I have photographed and illustrated seven extant Chrysemys picta bellii shells, six of which were collected at a single pond in Nebraska and one from Ladd Marsh in Union County, Oregon . Photographs and detailed illustrations indicate a broad range in the shapes of many characters.  Side by side comparisons of some key elements show that there is significant variation in several important characters (nuchal shape/sulci, entoplastron shape/sulci, and pygal shape/sulci). I also conducted a limited morphometric analysis of several sulcus/suture distance ratios, showing substantial variation between individuals in some cases. Covariance and correlation analysis of this variation suggests that allometry is not involved in most cases. In summary, this work provides a visual and morphometric dataset for aid in identifying and assigning shell elements of fossil emydid turtles.
金菊(Chrysemys picta bellii)壳元素的变异(Gray 1831)
由于种群内的变异范围通常不能很好地表征,因此将化石龟壳元素分配到一个特定的分类群往往是困难的。此外,有时也不清楚化石形式是否真的与现存的同类不同,因为现代物种的壳元素变异范围往往还没有确定。赤蠵龟也不例外,在鉴定孤立的化石元素时经常出现混淆,有时完整的贝壳代表着赤蠵龟、伪龟、Malaclemys和Graptemys,以及deirochelyids Chrysemys、clemys、Deirochelys和Trachemys。为了建立一个与现代龟类相对应的数据库,我拍摄了7个现存的龟壳,其中6个来自内布拉斯加州的一个池塘,另一个来自俄勒冈州联合县的拉德沼泽。照片和详细的插图表明,许多人物的形状范围很广。一些关键要素的对比显示,在几个重要特征(颈形状/沟、内乳突形状/沟和核形状/沟)上存在显著差异。我还对几个沟/缝线距离比率进行了有限的形态计量学分析,在某些情况下显示个体之间存在很大差异。这种变异的协方差和相关分析表明,在大多数情况下不涉及异速生长。总之,这项工作提供了一个视觉和形态测量数据集,有助于识别和分配化石甲鱼的壳元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信