Descartes’s Holenmerism: From metaphysics to phenomenology

M. Vuletic
{"title":"Descartes’s Holenmerism: From metaphysics to phenomenology","authors":"M. Vuletic","doi":"10.2298/theo2103053v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Descartes talks about the presence of immaterial soul in material body in\n multiple places in his writings and letters. Interpreters do not agree\n whether he had in mind substantial holenmeric presence of the soul or mere\n operational presence of the powers of the soul. I discuss both views in this\n paper, and argue that neither is plausible. The former turns out to be\n poorly motivated in the context of Descartes?s other metaphysical\n commitments and insufficiently textually supported. The latter is\n incompatible with Descartes?s understanding of the union of mind and body. I\n then offer reasons for the claim that Descartes, when talking about the\n presence of soul in body, puts forth a phenomenological rather than a\n metaphysical thesis.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"44 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2103053v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Descartes talks about the presence of immaterial soul in material body in multiple places in his writings and letters. Interpreters do not agree whether he had in mind substantial holenmeric presence of the soul or mere operational presence of the powers of the soul. I discuss both views in this paper, and argue that neither is plausible. The former turns out to be poorly motivated in the context of Descartes?s other metaphysical commitments and insufficiently textually supported. The latter is incompatible with Descartes?s understanding of the union of mind and body. I then offer reasons for the claim that Descartes, when talking about the presence of soul in body, puts forth a phenomenological rather than a metaphysical thesis.
笛卡儿的霍伦默主义:从形而上学到现象学
笛卡尔在他的著作和信件中多次谈到物质身体中非物质灵魂的存在。诠释者并不认同他是指灵魂实质性的整体存在还是仅仅是灵魂力量的操作存在。我在本文中讨论了这两种观点,并认为这两种观点都不可信。在笛卡尔的背景下前者的动机很差?其他形而上学的承诺和文本支持不足。后者与笛卡尔不相容?我们对身心结合的理解。然后我为笛卡尔的观点提供了理由,当谈到灵魂在身体中的存在时,他提出了一个现象学的论点,而不是形而上学的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信