Exploring Resilience in Undergraduate and Early Career Paramedics

Katie Mann, S. Delport, R. Stanton, D. Every
{"title":"Exploring Resilience in Undergraduate and Early Career Paramedics","authors":"Katie Mann, S. Delport, R. Stanton, D. Every","doi":"10.33151/ajp.18.894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Australian paramedics are frequently exposed to traumatic incidents as part of their role, and subsequently are at increased risk of mental health issues and negative impacts on psychological wellbeing. Evidence suggests student and early career paramedics are also at risk of trauma exposure during clinical placements. Increased levels of resilience are known to be protective against the risks of trauma exposure, and both age and experience may impact resilience. Self-efficacy is also known to influence resilience, however there is limited knowledge regarding the personal factors related to increased resilience in undergraduate and early career paramedic science students. This study aims to examine if resilience differs between age or experience groups, and if controlling for self-efficacy influences these differences. Methods An anonymous online survey was administered to current student paramedics and graduates from a regional Australian university. In addition to demographic characteristics, respondents completed the Brief Resilience Scale and the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Analysis of variance examined differences in resilience score based on age and clinical placement experience groups. Follow up analysis of covariance was conducted to control for self-efficacy scores. Results Analysis showed resilience scores differed between age groups (F(4,54)=3.26 p=0.02. Those 26 to 30 years of age reported significantly higher resilience compared to those 18 to 25 years of age. When controlling for self-efficacy, significant differences were found between clinical placement experience groups F(4,51)=2.72, p=0.04). Those completing 200 to 360 hours had significantly lower scores compared to those with less than 200 hours, 360 to 600 hours, or more than 600 hours. Conclusion We show that self-efficacy moderates resilience in undergraduate paramedic students. Examining the impact of self-efficacy training on resilience may be an important next step in curriculum development.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.18.894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction Australian paramedics are frequently exposed to traumatic incidents as part of their role, and subsequently are at increased risk of mental health issues and negative impacts on psychological wellbeing. Evidence suggests student and early career paramedics are also at risk of trauma exposure during clinical placements. Increased levels of resilience are known to be protective against the risks of trauma exposure, and both age and experience may impact resilience. Self-efficacy is also known to influence resilience, however there is limited knowledge regarding the personal factors related to increased resilience in undergraduate and early career paramedic science students. This study aims to examine if resilience differs between age or experience groups, and if controlling for self-efficacy influences these differences. Methods An anonymous online survey was administered to current student paramedics and graduates from a regional Australian university. In addition to demographic characteristics, respondents completed the Brief Resilience Scale and the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Analysis of variance examined differences in resilience score based on age and clinical placement experience groups. Follow up analysis of covariance was conducted to control for self-efficacy scores. Results Analysis showed resilience scores differed between age groups (F(4,54)=3.26 p=0.02. Those 26 to 30 years of age reported significantly higher resilience compared to those 18 to 25 years of age. When controlling for self-efficacy, significant differences were found between clinical placement experience groups F(4,51)=2.72, p=0.04). Those completing 200 to 360 hours had significantly lower scores compared to those with less than 200 hours, 360 to 600 hours, or more than 600 hours. Conclusion We show that self-efficacy moderates resilience in undergraduate paramedic students. Examining the impact of self-efficacy training on resilience may be an important next step in curriculum development.
探索本科和早期职业护理人员的心理弹性
澳大利亚护理人员在工作中经常遇到创伤性事件,因此心理健康问题的风险增加,对心理健康产生负面影响。有证据表明,学生和早期职业护理人员在临床实习期间也面临创伤暴露的风险。众所周知,增强的复原力水平可以防止创伤暴露的风险,年龄和经历都可能影响复原力。自我效能感也被认为会影响心理弹性,然而,关于本科和早期职业护理科学学生心理弹性增加的个人因素的知识有限。本研究旨在检验不同年龄或经验群体的心理弹性是否存在差异,以及自我效能感的控制是否会影响这些差异。方法采用匿名在线调查方法,对澳大利亚某地区大学在校生护理人员和毕业生进行调查。除了人口统计学特征外,受访者还完成了简要弹性量表和一般自我效能量表。方差分析检验了基于年龄和临床实习经验组的弹性评分差异。采用协方差分析对自我效能评分进行控制。结果各组心理弹性得分差异有统计学意义(F(4,54)=3.26, p=0.02)。与18至25岁的人相比,26至30岁的人的恢复能力明显更高。在控制自我效能感的情况下,临床实习经历组之间存在显著差异(F(4,51)=2.72, p=0.04)。与学习时间不足200小时、360至600小时或超过600小时的学生相比,学习时间在200至360小时之间的学生得分明显较低。结论自我效能感对护理本科学生的心理弹性有调节作用。研究自我效能训练对弹性的影响可能是课程开发的重要下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信