{"title":"Making Law and Recording It: Part I","authors":"J. Rosenblatt","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192842923.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyzes Selden’s contribution to the struggle to define the reach of ecclesiastical jurisdiction in the mid-1640s, as Presbyterians in the Westminster Assembly of Divines fought to have the power to exclude the “ignorant” and “scandalous” from communion. For Selden, the issue of excommunication turned—as it had in his handling of the topic of an ecclesiastical right to tithes—on the question of whether the clergy’s authority was God-given or man-made. The final section of the chapter suggests that Milton’s position on excommunication can only be indirectly inferred from his writings—in particular from his poem “On the New Forcers of Conscience,” which explicitly attacks the Assembly on plurality and the grouping of English churches in classes. Selden acknowledged that the expulsion of Adam and Eve from paradise might be construed as an “excommunication,” a cursing or anathemata. But Milton, who would become the great English poet of exile, failed to take the imaginative leap that would connect exile with excommunication.","PeriodicalId":149944,"journal":{"name":"John Selden","volume":"43 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"John Selden","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192842923.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter analyzes Selden’s contribution to the struggle to define the reach of ecclesiastical jurisdiction in the mid-1640s, as Presbyterians in the Westminster Assembly of Divines fought to have the power to exclude the “ignorant” and “scandalous” from communion. For Selden, the issue of excommunication turned—as it had in his handling of the topic of an ecclesiastical right to tithes—on the question of whether the clergy’s authority was God-given or man-made. The final section of the chapter suggests that Milton’s position on excommunication can only be indirectly inferred from his writings—in particular from his poem “On the New Forcers of Conscience,” which explicitly attacks the Assembly on plurality and the grouping of English churches in classes. Selden acknowledged that the expulsion of Adam and Eve from paradise might be construed as an “excommunication,” a cursing or anathemata. But Milton, who would become the great English poet of exile, failed to take the imaginative leap that would connect exile with excommunication.
本章分析塞尔登在17世纪40年代中期为界定教会管辖权范围的斗争中所作的贡献,当时威斯敏斯特议会(Westminster Assembly of Divines)的长老会教徒为拥有将“无知”和“丑闻”排除在圣餐之外的权力而斗争。对于塞尔登来说,逐出教会的问题——就像他在处理教会的什一税问题时一样——转向了神职人员的权威是上帝赋予的还是人为的问题。这一章的最后一节暗示,弥尔顿对逐出教会的立场只能从他的作品中间接推断出来,尤其是从他的诗《论良知的新力量》中,这首诗明确地攻击了议会的多元化和英国教会在班级中的分组。塞尔登承认,亚当和夏娃被驱逐出天堂可能会被解释为“被逐出教会”,是一种诅咒或诅咒。但是弥尔顿,这位后来伟大的英国流亡诗人,却没有将流放与逐出教会联系起来。