The Effect of Facebook Writing Group on Ethiopian Secondary School Students’ Writing Performance and Quality of Paragraphs

Tesfaye Habtemariam Gezahegn, Kassech Beyene
{"title":"The Effect of Facebook Writing Group on Ethiopian Secondary School Students’ Writing Performance and Quality of Paragraphs","authors":"Tesfaye Habtemariam Gezahegn, Kassech Beyene","doi":"10.59122/13454c9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching with widely accessed social media network tools like Facebook can positively contribute to students’ writing performance and quality of writing. However, teachers usually disregard Facebook because they doubt if it can be used as a platform for education. Therefore, this nested experimental design study investigated the effect of a Facebook writing group on students’ paragraph writing performance and the quality of paragraph writing. In order to achieve these, the researchers used randomly selected grade 11 students who were then randomly divided into two groups: experimental group and control group. The experimental group was taught paragraph writing in their Facebook writing group, whereas the control group was taught paragraph writing in a face-to-face (conventional classroom) situation. The researchers used pre-test and post-test to understand the effects of Facebook on students writing performance. An Independent sample T-test of the pre-test was used to check the equivalence between the experimental and control groups at the pre-intervention stage. Since the inferential statistical values for the pre-test mean of the control and the experimental groups were (t (.430), df=22, p=.671) at 0.05 level of significance, the groups were considered similar. The researchers used the same statistical test on the post-test to examine the impact of the treatment (the intervention). The study finding revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the scores of the groups in favor of the experimental group as the inferential statistical values for the post-test mean difference between the groups were (t (3.442), df=22, p=.0.002) at 0.05 level of significance. The researchers attributed this considerable result to the effectiveness of using Facebook for paragraph writing. However, the qualitative analysis of 14 paragraphs of the Facebook writing group showed that the quality of the paragraphs was not to the standard. As a result, teachers should equally consider the quality of students’ writing in addition to the improvement in their performances when using Facebook writing groups for teaching writing. Coursebook writers should also include writing tasks involving technological tools like Facebook at least as extension activities to the classroom writing with adequate exercises on punctuation, spelling, grammar, capitalization, and organization.","PeriodicalId":247662,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Business and Social Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Business and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59122/13454c9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teaching with widely accessed social media network tools like Facebook can positively contribute to students’ writing performance and quality of writing. However, teachers usually disregard Facebook because they doubt if it can be used as a platform for education. Therefore, this nested experimental design study investigated the effect of a Facebook writing group on students’ paragraph writing performance and the quality of paragraph writing. In order to achieve these, the researchers used randomly selected grade 11 students who were then randomly divided into two groups: experimental group and control group. The experimental group was taught paragraph writing in their Facebook writing group, whereas the control group was taught paragraph writing in a face-to-face (conventional classroom) situation. The researchers used pre-test and post-test to understand the effects of Facebook on students writing performance. An Independent sample T-test of the pre-test was used to check the equivalence between the experimental and control groups at the pre-intervention stage. Since the inferential statistical values for the pre-test mean of the control and the experimental groups were (t (.430), df=22, p=.671) at 0.05 level of significance, the groups were considered similar. The researchers used the same statistical test on the post-test to examine the impact of the treatment (the intervention). The study finding revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the scores of the groups in favor of the experimental group as the inferential statistical values for the post-test mean difference between the groups were (t (3.442), df=22, p=.0.002) at 0.05 level of significance. The researchers attributed this considerable result to the effectiveness of using Facebook for paragraph writing. However, the qualitative analysis of 14 paragraphs of the Facebook writing group showed that the quality of the paragraphs was not to the standard. As a result, teachers should equally consider the quality of students’ writing in addition to the improvement in their performances when using Facebook writing groups for teaching writing. Coursebook writers should also include writing tasks involving technological tools like Facebook at least as extension activities to the classroom writing with adequate exercises on punctuation, spelling, grammar, capitalization, and organization.
Facebook写作小组对埃塞俄比亚中学生写作表现和段落质量的影响
使用Facebook等广泛使用的社交媒体网络工具进行教学,对学生的写作成绩和写作质量有积极的促进作用。然而,教师们通常无视Facebook,因为他们怀疑它是否可以作为一个教育平台。因此,本套式实验设计研究考察了Facebook写作小组对学生段落写作表现和段落写作质量的影响。为了实现这些目标,研究人员随机选择了11年级的学生,然后将他们随机分为两组:实验组和对照组。实验组在他们的Facebook写作小组中学习段落写作,而对照组在面对面(传统课堂)的情况下学习段落写作。研究人员通过前测和后测来了解Facebook对学生写作表现的影响。采用预检验的独立样本t检验,检验实验组与对照组在干预前阶段的等价性。对照组与试验组检验前均值的推理统计值为(t (.430), df=22, p=.671),在0.05显著水平上,认为两组相似。研究人员在测试后使用了相同的统计测试来检查治疗(干预)的影响。研究结果显示,实验组得分较高的组间得分差异有统计学意义,组间测后均值差异的推论统计值为(t (3.442), df=22, p=.0.002),在0.05显著水平上。研究人员将这一显著结果归因于使用Facebook撰写段落的有效性。然而,对14段Facebook写作小组的定性分析表明,段落的质量不达标。因此,教师在使用Facebook写作小组进行写作教学时,除了提高学生的写作成绩外,还应该同等地考虑学生的写作质量。教材编写者还应该包括使用Facebook等技术工具的写作任务,至少作为课堂写作的延伸活动,包括标点、拼写、语法、大写和组织方面的充分练习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信