Who should I add as a "friend"?: a study of friend recommendations using proximity and homophily

MSM '13 Pub Date : 2013-05-01 DOI:10.1145/2463656.2463663
Alvin Chin, Bin Xu, Hao Wang
{"title":"Who should I add as a \"friend\"?: a study of friend recommendations using proximity and homophily","authors":"Alvin Chin, Bin Xu, Hao Wang","doi":"10.1145/2463656.2463663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We receive many recommendations of friends in online social networks such as Facebook and LinkedIn. These friend recommendations are based usually on common friends or similar profile such as having the same interest or coming from the same company, a trait known as homophily. However, many times people do not know why they should add this friend. Should I add this friend because we met from a conference and if so, what conference? Existing friend recommendation systems cannot answer this question easily. In this paper, we create a friend recommendation system using proximity and homophily, that we conduct in the workplace and conference. Besides common friends and common interests (homophily features), we also include encounters and meetings (proximity features) and messages sent and question and answer posts (social interaction features) as reasons for adding this person as a friend. We conduct a user study to examine whether our friend recommendation is better than common friends. Results show that on average, our algorithm recommends more friends to participants that they add and more recommendations are ranked as good, compared with the common friend algorithm. In addition, people add friends due to having encountered them before in real life. The results can be used to help design context-aware recommendations in physical environments and in online social networks.","PeriodicalId":136302,"journal":{"name":"MSM '13","volume":"57 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MSM '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2463656.2463663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

We receive many recommendations of friends in online social networks such as Facebook and LinkedIn. These friend recommendations are based usually on common friends or similar profile such as having the same interest or coming from the same company, a trait known as homophily. However, many times people do not know why they should add this friend. Should I add this friend because we met from a conference and if so, what conference? Existing friend recommendation systems cannot answer this question easily. In this paper, we create a friend recommendation system using proximity and homophily, that we conduct in the workplace and conference. Besides common friends and common interests (homophily features), we also include encounters and meetings (proximity features) and messages sent and question and answer posts (social interaction features) as reasons for adding this person as a friend. We conduct a user study to examine whether our friend recommendation is better than common friends. Results show that on average, our algorithm recommends more friends to participants that they add and more recommendations are ranked as good, compared with the common friend algorithm. In addition, people add friends due to having encountered them before in real life. The results can be used to help design context-aware recommendations in physical environments and in online social networks.
我应该加谁为“好友”?一项利用接近性和同质性进行朋友推荐的研究
我们在Facebook和LinkedIn等在线社交网络上收到很多朋友的推荐。这些朋友推荐通常是基于共同的朋友或相似的资料,比如有相同的兴趣或来自同一家公司,这种特征被称为同质性。然而,很多时候人们不知道为什么他们应该添加这个朋友。我应该加上这个朋友吗,因为我们是在一个会议上认识的,如果是,是什么会议?现有的好友推荐系统无法轻易回答这个问题。在本文中,我们利用接近性和同质性创建了一个朋友推荐系统,并在工作场所和会议中进行了应用。除了共同的朋友和共同的兴趣(同质性特征),我们还将偶遇和会议(接近性特征)以及发送的消息和问答帖子(社交互动特征)作为添加此人为好友的原因。我们进行了一项用户研究,以检验我们的朋友推荐是否比普通朋友更好。结果表明,与普通好友算法相比,平均而言,我们的算法向参与者推荐了更多他们添加的好友,并且更多的推荐被评为优秀。此外,人们添加朋友是因为在现实生活中遇到过他们。研究结果可用于帮助设计物理环境和在线社交网络中的上下文感知推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信