Are Christian Schools Really Christian? Perceptions of Final Year Pre-service Teachers in Australia

Beverly J. Christian, P. Beamish
{"title":"Are Christian Schools Really Christian? Perceptions of Final Year Pre-service Teachers in Australia","authors":"Beverly J. Christian, P. Beamish","doi":"10.55254/1835-1492.1394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Final year pre-service teachers at a private provider of Christian higher education were surveyed to discover their perceptions of the special character of a wide spectrum of Australian Christian faith-based schools. They each completed an eight week placement, spread over two sessions, in a Christian school. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through open-ended written responses and a questionnaire. The results indicated that a special Christian character was visible to the preservice teachers, with evidence that Christian worldview alignments in the areas of school culture, relationships, service and discipleship in Christian schools is easier to identify than in the learning and teaching aspects of schools’ operations. Introduction, aim and purpose Stephen Covey (1989, p. 28) reminds us that, ‘We see the world not as it is, but as we are...’ This study sought to investigate the visibility of the special Christian character of schools from the perspective of final year pre-service teachers who are about to enter the workforce. In particular, the study looked at the alignment of the practices of the school with a Christian worldview and uses the phrase ‘Christian worldview alignment’ to describe aspects of a school’s operation that reflect beliefs rising out of a Christian worldview and hence give it a special character that reflects Christian characteristics. The study aimed to identify those areas in the sampled schools where Christian Worldview was overtly visible, and those areas where it was less noticeable to pre-service teachers. In doing so, this investigation is relevant to key stakeholders in Christian education; firstly to Christian teachers and administrators as it identifies how special character through a Christian worldview alignment is perceived from the perspective of preservice teachers who may bring a fresh set of eyes and new perspective; secondly, to providers of Christian higher education as they develop frameworks to discuss and explain the concept of Christian worldview alignment and its implications for teachers, and thirdly; to pre-service teachers as they prepare for employment in Christian schools. Background and context The number of students in independent schools in Australia has grown from 4.1% of total enrolments in Australian schools in 1970 to a market share of 20.3% in 2016, with 85% of independent schools having religious affiliation (Independent Schools Council in Australia, 2017). This growth has been accompanied by robust discussion pertaining to the philosophy, purpose and practice of Christian education (Cairney, Cowling & Jensen, 2011; Edlin, 2014; Ellis & Ireland, 2006; Fennema, 2006; Goodlet and Collier, 2014; Knight, 2016; Murison, 2018; Roy, 2008). These conversations are crucial given the increasingly diverse belief systems from which students are attracted as more parents seek a valuesbased and academically strong education, rather than a specifically ‘Christian’ education for their children (Beamish & Morey, 2014, p.32). Even in those schools that draw from a predominantly Christian base, ongoing examination of how a Christian worldview is enacted within a school remains important in order for schools to fulfil their mission, preserve their special character and the operational distinctiveness of Christian education. TEACHR TEACH Journal 12-2.indd 23 26/3/19 10:08 pm 24 | TEACH | v12 n2 v12 n2 | TEACH | 25 Research & Scholarship Worldview and Christian education Worldview can be defined as the assumptions that guide our understanding of the big questions in life. These big questions (in everyday language) include: Where did I come from? Why am I here? What is wrong with the world? Is there a solution? (Fisher, 2010; Olthuis, 1985; Sire, 2015). The answers to these and related questions provide a worldview structure through which we understand the world and our purpose for existence (Fisher, 2010; Goheen & Bartholomew, 2008; Henderson, Henderson & Thompson, 2006; Nash, 2013; Naugle, 2002; Sire, 2004). Christian educators agree that Christian education needs to have underlying beliefs and philosophical assumptions that are Christian (Cairney, et al., 2011; Dowson, 2014; Edlin, 2014; Knight, 2016; Roy, 2008). In fact, most Christian schools and school systems have been set up to foster a Christian worldview. These schools, and the associated expense of operating them, can only be justified if they are faithful to the philosophical foundation upon which they were established (Knight, 2016). The formation of the Christian worldview is a priority because Christian education seeks to help ‘students to live life before God as God designed it to be’ (Fennema, 2006, p.30). A worldview construct becomes the framework through which students view the world and gives them a way to structure, interpret and implement the various components of their life in a way that gives their life meaning. Developing a robust Christian worldview equips students with an important tool to negotiate and make sense of life using a Christian lens and is central to the purpose of Christian education. Despite this belief, Murison (2018, p. 90) posits that Christian worldview alignment in schools “has been undertaken as a largely intellectual and theoretical task”. This can be attributed, at least in part, to the understanding that an individual’s worldview exists partially in the sub-conscious rather than the conscious (Olthuis, 1985; Sire, 2004). As Walsh and Middleton (1984) posit, worldview needs to become visible if it is to provide a paradigm to guide and fashion the thoughts and actions of its adherents. Without this visibility, there may be a disconnect between the actuality of belief and the reality of life (Thompson, 2004). This calls for Christian teachers to be overt in living their worldview, and poses a challenge because an institutional worldview enactment relies on individuals whose personal worldviews may be at various stages of development. While it is anticipated that teachers in Christian schools will adopt and model a Christian worldview, Rasmussen and Rasmussen (2006, p.3) have identified seven distinct teaching levels that range from ‘non-use’ of Christian worldview through ‘superficial’ and ‘routine’ to ‘dynamic integration’ of Christian worldview. These labels reflect the anomalies found in Christian classrooms and suggest that Christian scholarship needs to further investigate how faith shapes pedagogical practice, an idea supported by Smith and Smith (2011). Alignment of school practices with a Christian worldview models the way that Christian principles are actioned and integrates faith, learning and life. This process is important and should underlie all the educational activity in a Christian school. It is a mixture of corporate and individual influence that is the result of intentional activity that aims to holistically develop students. Christian education A review of relevant literature reveals that schools’ alignment with Christian worldview, that is this aspect of their Christian special character, is often evidenced in the areas of: school culture, relationships, belief enactment, and transformation. School culture includes the daily program of the school and the impact of the physical environment (Roy, 2008). The relationships within the school are important and Christian worldview alignment is often exemplified by relationships within the school community (Francis, Casson, & McKenna, 2018; Scouller, 2012). Based in the belief that a triune God is a God of community (Cairney et al., 2011), Christian schools operate as communities of faith and learning where committed teachers foster safe and authentic relationships as part of their ethos. Wilhoit and Rozema (2005, p. 248) make a strong case for teachers whose words and actions transform the school “into a loving, just, compassionate, and worshipping community that invites openness and dialogue”. This results in an environment where “committed partnerships, mutually supportive relationships and a relationally supportive environment are reflected in every aspect of the school” (Burggraaf, 2014, p. 79). The special character of the school is also influenced by the beliefs adhered to within the school. This involves more than intellectually subscribing to the theological beliefs on which the school philosophy is based. Rather, school special character focuses on how those beliefs are evidenced in every aspect of school life (Edlin, 2006, Jackson, 2009). It goes beyond knowing what one believes, or transmitting these beliefs to students in religious education classes. While Wilhoit and Rozema’s (2005) position on the relational role of Christian teachers is salient, one must also assert the foundational premise that the curriculum should also be aligned with a Christian worldview, so ” “for Christian teachers to be overt in living their worldview ... poses a challenge because an institutional worldview enactment relies on individuals whose ... worldviews may be at various stages of development. TEACH Journal 12-2.indd 24 26/3/19 10:08 pm 24 | TEACH | v12 n2 v12 n2 | TEACH | 25 Research & Scholarship that the school’s learning and teaching programs support Christian faith and biblical beliefs rather than contradicting them (Anderson, 2013; Edlin, 2014; Thompson, 2004). Even more challenging for Christian teachers is the act of aligning pedagogical practice with Christian frameworks, so both what is taught and how it is taught aligns with a Christian worldview, an area where reality often falls short of expectations (Cairney et al., 2011; Edlin, 2014; Scouller, 2012; Smith & Smith, 2014). Murison (2018) offers a cautionary note on this issue, positing that attempts to integrate faith and learning may actually result in dualism unless teachers are teaching from a strong faith basis. The final area where Christian worldview alignment is often evident is in the transforming process at work in the lives of ","PeriodicalId":171026,"journal":{"name":"TEACH Journal of Christian Education","volume":"62 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEACH Journal of Christian Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55254/1835-1492.1394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Final year pre-service teachers at a private provider of Christian higher education were surveyed to discover their perceptions of the special character of a wide spectrum of Australian Christian faith-based schools. They each completed an eight week placement, spread over two sessions, in a Christian school. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through open-ended written responses and a questionnaire. The results indicated that a special Christian character was visible to the preservice teachers, with evidence that Christian worldview alignments in the areas of school culture, relationships, service and discipleship in Christian schools is easier to identify than in the learning and teaching aspects of schools’ operations. Introduction, aim and purpose Stephen Covey (1989, p. 28) reminds us that, ‘We see the world not as it is, but as we are...’ This study sought to investigate the visibility of the special Christian character of schools from the perspective of final year pre-service teachers who are about to enter the workforce. In particular, the study looked at the alignment of the practices of the school with a Christian worldview and uses the phrase ‘Christian worldview alignment’ to describe aspects of a school’s operation that reflect beliefs rising out of a Christian worldview and hence give it a special character that reflects Christian characteristics. The study aimed to identify those areas in the sampled schools where Christian Worldview was overtly visible, and those areas where it was less noticeable to pre-service teachers. In doing so, this investigation is relevant to key stakeholders in Christian education; firstly to Christian teachers and administrators as it identifies how special character through a Christian worldview alignment is perceived from the perspective of preservice teachers who may bring a fresh set of eyes and new perspective; secondly, to providers of Christian higher education as they develop frameworks to discuss and explain the concept of Christian worldview alignment and its implications for teachers, and thirdly; to pre-service teachers as they prepare for employment in Christian schools. Background and context The number of students in independent schools in Australia has grown from 4.1% of total enrolments in Australian schools in 1970 to a market share of 20.3% in 2016, with 85% of independent schools having religious affiliation (Independent Schools Council in Australia, 2017). This growth has been accompanied by robust discussion pertaining to the philosophy, purpose and practice of Christian education (Cairney, Cowling & Jensen, 2011; Edlin, 2014; Ellis & Ireland, 2006; Fennema, 2006; Goodlet and Collier, 2014; Knight, 2016; Murison, 2018; Roy, 2008). These conversations are crucial given the increasingly diverse belief systems from which students are attracted as more parents seek a valuesbased and academically strong education, rather than a specifically ‘Christian’ education for their children (Beamish & Morey, 2014, p.32). Even in those schools that draw from a predominantly Christian base, ongoing examination of how a Christian worldview is enacted within a school remains important in order for schools to fulfil their mission, preserve their special character and the operational distinctiveness of Christian education. TEACHR TEACH Journal 12-2.indd 23 26/3/19 10:08 pm 24 | TEACH | v12 n2 v12 n2 | TEACH | 25 Research & Scholarship Worldview and Christian education Worldview can be defined as the assumptions that guide our understanding of the big questions in life. These big questions (in everyday language) include: Where did I come from? Why am I here? What is wrong with the world? Is there a solution? (Fisher, 2010; Olthuis, 1985; Sire, 2015). The answers to these and related questions provide a worldview structure through which we understand the world and our purpose for existence (Fisher, 2010; Goheen & Bartholomew, 2008; Henderson, Henderson & Thompson, 2006; Nash, 2013; Naugle, 2002; Sire, 2004). Christian educators agree that Christian education needs to have underlying beliefs and philosophical assumptions that are Christian (Cairney, et al., 2011; Dowson, 2014; Edlin, 2014; Knight, 2016; Roy, 2008). In fact, most Christian schools and school systems have been set up to foster a Christian worldview. These schools, and the associated expense of operating them, can only be justified if they are faithful to the philosophical foundation upon which they were established (Knight, 2016). The formation of the Christian worldview is a priority because Christian education seeks to help ‘students to live life before God as God designed it to be’ (Fennema, 2006, p.30). A worldview construct becomes the framework through which students view the world and gives them a way to structure, interpret and implement the various components of their life in a way that gives their life meaning. Developing a robust Christian worldview equips students with an important tool to negotiate and make sense of life using a Christian lens and is central to the purpose of Christian education. Despite this belief, Murison (2018, p. 90) posits that Christian worldview alignment in schools “has been undertaken as a largely intellectual and theoretical task”. This can be attributed, at least in part, to the understanding that an individual’s worldview exists partially in the sub-conscious rather than the conscious (Olthuis, 1985; Sire, 2004). As Walsh and Middleton (1984) posit, worldview needs to become visible if it is to provide a paradigm to guide and fashion the thoughts and actions of its adherents. Without this visibility, there may be a disconnect between the actuality of belief and the reality of life (Thompson, 2004). This calls for Christian teachers to be overt in living their worldview, and poses a challenge because an institutional worldview enactment relies on individuals whose personal worldviews may be at various stages of development. While it is anticipated that teachers in Christian schools will adopt and model a Christian worldview, Rasmussen and Rasmussen (2006, p.3) have identified seven distinct teaching levels that range from ‘non-use’ of Christian worldview through ‘superficial’ and ‘routine’ to ‘dynamic integration’ of Christian worldview. These labels reflect the anomalies found in Christian classrooms and suggest that Christian scholarship needs to further investigate how faith shapes pedagogical practice, an idea supported by Smith and Smith (2011). Alignment of school practices with a Christian worldview models the way that Christian principles are actioned and integrates faith, learning and life. This process is important and should underlie all the educational activity in a Christian school. It is a mixture of corporate and individual influence that is the result of intentional activity that aims to holistically develop students. Christian education A review of relevant literature reveals that schools’ alignment with Christian worldview, that is this aspect of their Christian special character, is often evidenced in the areas of: school culture, relationships, belief enactment, and transformation. School culture includes the daily program of the school and the impact of the physical environment (Roy, 2008). The relationships within the school are important and Christian worldview alignment is often exemplified by relationships within the school community (Francis, Casson, & McKenna, 2018; Scouller, 2012). Based in the belief that a triune God is a God of community (Cairney et al., 2011), Christian schools operate as communities of faith and learning where committed teachers foster safe and authentic relationships as part of their ethos. Wilhoit and Rozema (2005, p. 248) make a strong case for teachers whose words and actions transform the school “into a loving, just, compassionate, and worshipping community that invites openness and dialogue”. This results in an environment where “committed partnerships, mutually supportive relationships and a relationally supportive environment are reflected in every aspect of the school” (Burggraaf, 2014, p. 79). The special character of the school is also influenced by the beliefs adhered to within the school. This involves more than intellectually subscribing to the theological beliefs on which the school philosophy is based. Rather, school special character focuses on how those beliefs are evidenced in every aspect of school life (Edlin, 2006, Jackson, 2009). It goes beyond knowing what one believes, or transmitting these beliefs to students in religious education classes. While Wilhoit and Rozema’s (2005) position on the relational role of Christian teachers is salient, one must also assert the foundational premise that the curriculum should also be aligned with a Christian worldview, so ” “for Christian teachers to be overt in living their worldview ... poses a challenge because an institutional worldview enactment relies on individuals whose ... worldviews may be at various stages of development. TEACH Journal 12-2.indd 24 26/3/19 10:08 pm 24 | TEACH | v12 n2 v12 n2 | TEACH | 25 Research & Scholarship that the school’s learning and teaching programs support Christian faith and biblical beliefs rather than contradicting them (Anderson, 2013; Edlin, 2014; Thompson, 2004). Even more challenging for Christian teachers is the act of aligning pedagogical practice with Christian frameworks, so both what is taught and how it is taught aligns with a Christian worldview, an area where reality often falls short of expectations (Cairney et al., 2011; Edlin, 2014; Scouller, 2012; Smith & Smith, 2014). Murison (2018) offers a cautionary note on this issue, positing that attempts to integrate faith and learning may actually result in dualism unless teachers are teaching from a strong faith basis. The final area where Christian worldview alignment is often evident is in the transforming process at work in the lives of
基督教学校真的是基督教学校吗?对澳大利亚最后一年职前教师的看法
建立一个健全的基督教世界观,为学生提供了一个重要的工具,使他们能够用基督教的视角来谈判和理解生活,这是基督教教育的核心目的。尽管有这种信念,Murison(2018,第90页)认为,基督教世界观在学校中的一致性“主要是作为一项智力和理论任务进行的”。这可以归因于,至少部分地,理解一个人的世界观部分存在于潜意识中,而不是意识中(Olthuis, 1985;陛下,2004)。正如沃尔什和米德尔顿(1984)所假定的那样,如果世界观要提供一个范式来指导和塑造其追随者的思想和行动,就需要变得可见。如果没有这种可见性,信仰的现实性和生活的现实性之间可能会出现脱节(Thompson, 2004)。这要求基督教教师在生活中公开他们的世界观,并提出了一个挑战,因为一个制度性的世界观制定依赖于个人的个人世界观可能处于不同的发展阶段。虽然预计基督教学校的教师将采用并模仿基督教世界观,但Rasmussen和Rasmussen(2006,第3页)已经确定了七个不同的教学水平,从“不使用”基督教世界观,到“肤浅”和“常规”,再到基督教世界观的“动态整合”。这些标签反映了在基督教课堂中发现的异常现象,并表明基督教学术需要进一步研究信仰如何影响教学实践,这是Smith和Smith(2011)支持的一个想法。学校实践与基督教世界观的结合是基督教原则的典范,它将信仰、学习和生活结合在一起。这个过程很重要,应该是基督教学校所有教育活动的基础。它是公司和个人影响的混合,是旨在全面发展学生的有意活动的结果。对相关文献的回顾表明,学校与基督教世界观的一致,即其基督教特色的这一方面,经常在以下方面得到证明:学校文化、关系、信仰制定和转变。学校文化包括学校的日常活动和物理环境的影响(Roy, 2008)。学校内部的关系很重要,基督教世界观的一致性通常体现在学校社区内部的关系中(Francis, Casson, & McKenna, 2018;Scouller, 2012)。基于三位一体的上帝是社区之神的信念(Cairney et al., 2011),基督教学校作为信仰和学习的社区运作,忠诚的教师培养安全和真实的关系,作为他们精神的一部分。Wilhoit和Rozema(2005,第248页)强有力地证明,教师的言行能将学校“转变为一个充满爱心、公正、富有同情心和崇拜的社区,鼓励开放和对话”。这就形成了一个“承诺的伙伴关系、相互支持的关系和相互支持的环境反映在学校的各个方面”的环境(Burggraaf, 2014, p. 79)。学校的特殊性也受到学校内部坚持的信仰的影响。这不仅仅是在智力上认同学派哲学所基于的神学信仰。相反,学校特色侧重于这些信念如何在学校生活的各个方面得到证明(Edlin, 2006, Jackson, 2009)。它不仅仅是了解一个人的信仰,或者在宗教教育课上向学生传授这些信仰。虽然Wilhoit和Rozema(2005)关于基督教教师的关系角色的立场是突出的,但我们也必须坚持一个基本前提,即课程也应该与基督教世界观保持一致,因此“对于基督教教师来说,他们的世界观是公开的……这是一个挑战,因为一个制度性世界观的制定依赖于个人,他们……世界观可能处于不同的发展阶段。TEACH Journal 12-2。25研究与奖学金:学校的学习和教学项目支持基督教信仰和圣经信仰,而不是与之相矛盾(安德森,2013;行编辑,2014;汤普森,2004)。对于基督教教师来说,更具挑战性的是将教学实践与基督教框架结合起来,因此所教的内容和教学方式都与基督教的世界观保持一致,这是一个现实往往达不到预期的领域(Cairney等人,2011;行编辑,2014;Scouller, 2012;Smith & Smith, 2014)。Murison(2018)在这个问题上提出了一个警告,他假设,除非教师基于强大的信仰基础进行教学,否则将信仰与学习结合起来的尝试实际上可能会导致二元论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信