Detecting and Visualizing the Dispute Structure of the Replying Comments in the Internet Forum Sites

Yun-Jung Lee, J. Shim, Hwan-Gue Cho, G. Woo
{"title":"Detecting and Visualizing the Dispute Structure of the Replying Comments in the Internet Forum Sites","authors":"Yun-Jung Lee, J. Shim, Hwan-Gue Cho, G. Woo","doi":"10.1109/CYBERC.2010.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparing with the existing web pages, one of the popular features of blogs and the web discussion boards is the capability of the interactive communication among users. In online communities such as web logs or Internet discussion boards, users can read articles, as well as write some comments to the articles to express his/her opinion. These kinds of replying comments become an important means of communication between the author who writes the article and the readers of it. Sometimes, we can find new information that does not appear in the contents of the article by reading comments posted to the article. Also, we can figure out various opinions in comments by reading controversial comments. Popular articles, however, frequently get up to thousands of comments, which is too much to be read in a reasonable time. Especially, to find dispute relations in the comments, we have no alternative but to read all the comments. Although there have been several studies to extract an opinion or a controversy from comments or social networks, most of them tend to be dependent on the language used or the typing errors of the contents. In this reason, we propose a method for extracting the dispute relations from comments and visualizing them including the involved commenters. Since comments written by disputing commenters tend to appear in turns, we consider only the order of commenters to detect pairs of commenters in disputing. So, our method is not affected by the language used nor typos in comments. Also, the dispute relations are visualized by an undirected graph, and it is helpful to grasp the degree of controversy intuitively. According to the experimental results, our method is able to detect dispute couples of commenters about 79% on average. Also, we could find unusual commenters such as spammers or bursty commenters as well as a structure of controversy in comments.","PeriodicalId":315132,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBERC.2010.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Comparing with the existing web pages, one of the popular features of blogs and the web discussion boards is the capability of the interactive communication among users. In online communities such as web logs or Internet discussion boards, users can read articles, as well as write some comments to the articles to express his/her opinion. These kinds of replying comments become an important means of communication between the author who writes the article and the readers of it. Sometimes, we can find new information that does not appear in the contents of the article by reading comments posted to the article. Also, we can figure out various opinions in comments by reading controversial comments. Popular articles, however, frequently get up to thousands of comments, which is too much to be read in a reasonable time. Especially, to find dispute relations in the comments, we have no alternative but to read all the comments. Although there have been several studies to extract an opinion or a controversy from comments or social networks, most of them tend to be dependent on the language used or the typing errors of the contents. In this reason, we propose a method for extracting the dispute relations from comments and visualizing them including the involved commenters. Since comments written by disputing commenters tend to appear in turns, we consider only the order of commenters to detect pairs of commenters in disputing. So, our method is not affected by the language used nor typos in comments. Also, the dispute relations are visualized by an undirected graph, and it is helpful to grasp the degree of controversy intuitively. According to the experimental results, our method is able to detect dispute couples of commenters about 79% on average. Also, we could find unusual commenters such as spammers or bursty commenters as well as a structure of controversy in comments.
互联网论坛网站回帖争议结构的检测与可视化
与现有的网页相比,博客和网络讨论板最受欢迎的特点之一是用户之间的互动交流能力。在网络日志或网络讨论板等网络社区中,用户可以阅读文章,也可以给文章写一些评论来表达自己的观点。这种回复评论成为作者和读者之间沟通的重要手段。有时,我们可以通过阅读文章的评论来发现文章内容中没有出现的新信息。此外,我们可以通过阅读有争议的评论来了解评论中的各种观点。然而,受欢迎的文章经常会有成千上万的评论,这对于在合理的时间内阅读太多了。特别是,要在评论中找到争议关系,我们别无选择,只能阅读所有的评论。虽然已经有一些研究从评论或社交网络中提取观点或争议,但大多数研究往往依赖于使用的语言或内容的打字错误。因此,我们提出了一种从评论中提取争议关系并将其可视化的方法,包括所涉及的评论。由于有争议的评论者所写的评论往往是轮流出现的,我们只考虑评论者的顺序来检测有争议的评论者对。因此,我们的方法不受所用语言和注释中的错别字的影响。此外,纠纷关系用无向图进行可视化,有助于直观地把握纠纷的程度。根据实验结果,我们的方法平均能够检测到评论者的争议夫妇约79%。此外,我们可以发现不寻常的评论,如垃圾邮件发送者或突发评论以及评论中的争议结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信